kbuild test robot
2019-Feb-05 19:37 UTC
[vhost:linux-next 3/23] include/linux/swiotlb.h:105:20: error: static declaration of 'is_swiotlb_active' follows non-static declaration
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next head: 104f89a60ef5ec77d6f559eac4676844b3480740 commit: 155fcd8511de5f99c27a726e9153b87cce528b6e [3/23] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function config: i386-tinyconfig (attached as .config) compiler: gcc-8 (Debian 8.2.0-14) 8.2.0 reproduce: git checkout 155fcd8511de5f99c27a726e9153b87cce528b6e # save the attached .config to linux build tree make ARCH=i386 All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from arch/x86/include/asm/swiotlb.h:5, from arch/x86/include/asm/dma-mapping.h:13, from include/linux/dma-mapping.h:261, from include/linux/skbuff.h:34, from include/net/net_namespace.h:36, from include/linux/inet.h:46, from include/linux/sunrpc/msg_prot.h:204, from include/linux/sunrpc/auth.h:16, from include/linux/nfs_fs.h:31, from init/do_mounts.c:22: include/linux/swiotlb.h:100:22: error: static declaration of 'swiotlb_max_mapping_size' follows non-static declaration static inline size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/swiotlb.h:65:8: note: previous declaration of 'swiotlb_max_mapping_size' was here size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>> include/linux/swiotlb.h:105:20: error: static declaration of 'is_swiotlb_active' follows non-static declarationstatic inline bool is_swiotlb_active(void) ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/swiotlb.h:66:6: note: previous declaration of 'is_swiotlb_active' was here bool is_swiotlb_active(void); ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/is_swiotlb_active +105 include/linux/swiotlb.h 76 77 bool swiotlb_map(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t *phys, dma_addr_t *dma_addr, 78 size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs); 79 void __init swiotlb_exit(void); 80 unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void); 81 #else 82 #define swiotlb_force SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE 83 static inline bool is_swiotlb_buffer(phys_addr_t paddr) 84 { 85 return false; 86 } 87 static inline bool swiotlb_map(struct device *dev, phys_addr_t *phys, 88 dma_addr_t *dma_addr, size_t size, enum dma_data_direction dir, 89 unsigned long attrs) 90 { 91 return false; 92 } 93 static inline void swiotlb_exit(void) 94 { 95 } 96 static inline unsigned int swiotlb_max_segment(void) 97 { 98 return 0; 99 } > 100 static inline size_t swiotlb_max_mapping_size(struct device *dev) 101 { 102 return SIZE_MAX; 103 } 104 > 105 static inline bool is_swiotlb_active(void) 106 { 107 return false; 108 } 109 #endif /* CONFIG_SWIOTLB */ 110 --- 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: .config.gz Type: application/gzip Size: 6514 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/virtualization/attachments/20190206/64c5e027/attachment-0001.bin>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH v7 2/5] swiotlb: Add is_swiotlb_active() function
- [vhost:linux-next 2/23] include/linux/swiotlb.h:99:22: error: static declaration of 'swiotlb_max_mapping_size' follows non-static declaration
- [PATCH v7 0/5] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB
- [PATCH 4/4] swiotlb: unexport is_swiotlb_active
- [PATCH 0/5 v6] Fix virtio-blk issue with SWIOTLB