Hans van Kranenburg
2020-Jul-20 15:35 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Regression in Qemu 1:5.0-9 / 1:3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u6 for Xen/HVM
Hi all, tl;dr: When using HVM, stay at, or downgrade qemu to: - unstable: 1:5.0-8 - stable: 1:3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u5 In the previous week there has been debugging going on around a report of failing to start HVM guests with the qemu update in Debian unstable. Today it was discovered that the same issue had leaked to Debian stable in the last security update. The cause has been found now, and a regression update is in the works. Hans
Hans van Kranenburg
2020-Jul-20 16:38 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Regression in Qemu 1:5.0-6 / 1:3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u6 for Xen/HVM
Actually, On 7/20/20 5:35 PM, Hans van Kranenburg wrote:> Hi all, > > tl;dr: When using HVM, stay at, or downgrade qemu to: > - unstable: 1:5.0-8Sorry, I messed up the numbers. It was introduced in -6, which is in testing now. So, downgrade to 1:5.0-5 when using HVM in Debian testing and experiencing problems. https://snapshot.debian.org/package/qemu/> - stable: 1:3.1+dfsg-8+deb10u5 > > In the previous week there has been debugging going on around a report > of failing to start HVM guests with the qemu update in Debian unstable.Relevant debian bug: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=964793> Today it was discovered that the same issue had leaked to Debian stable > in the last security update. > > The cause has been found now, and a regression update is in the works.Package for unstable has been uploaded: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1161486/accepted-qemu-150-11-source-into-unstable/ https://salsa.debian.org/qemu-team/qemu/-/commit/ed2513350be80b068e37c2e03b6261ad77439ea0 Proposed fix for upstream: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-07/msg05886.html Stable security regression update will follow. Hans