reassign 768005 src:xen 4.11.1-1 thanks Hi, I was browsing the bash-completion package bug list before filing a bug to remove the obsolete 'xm' file, and then I ran into this one. Reassigning to Debian Xen team, since I that makes more sense. We totally missed this on our (release) radar. And indeed, we're shipping the upstream completion file now. Adi, I see how you're improving it, and I like it. So, we should probably ship this instead, but at the same time, the right (tm) place to move this is upstream. We're activetly trying to get rid of "adjusted copies of upstream stuff" in the packaging. Would you mind making an upstream patch out of this? I can help with that if needed. Then it gets proper review, and upstream can maintain it when commands are added/changed etc. Thanks, Hans
Debian Bug Tracking System
2019-Feb-10 17:09 UTC
[Pkg-xen-devel] Processed: Re: xl / xen bash completion
Processing commands for control at bugs.debian.org:> reassign 768005 src:xen 4.11.1-1Bug #768005 [bash-completion] Please support xl xen management command Bug reassigned from package 'bash-completion' to 'src:xen'. No longer marked as found in versions bash-completion/1:2.1-4. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #768005 to the same values previously set Bug #768005 [src:xen] Please support xl xen management command Marked as found in versions xen/4.11.1-1.> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 768005: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=768005 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner at bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi!> Reassigning to Debian Xen team, since I that makes more sense. We > totally missed this on our (release) radar. > > And indeed, we're shipping the upstream completion file now. Adi, I see > how you're improving it, and I like it.I'm happy you like it...> So, we should probably ship this instead, but at the same time, the > right (tm) place to move this is upstream. We're activetly trying to get > rid of "adjusted copies of upstream stuff" in the packaging.I think it would be great if you could ship that for Buster because I don't think upstream will merge it within the next month... ;-)> Would you mind making an upstream patch out of this? I can help with > that if needed. Then it gets proper review, and upstream can maintain it > when commands are added/changed etc.Find the patch attached; it is based on upstream's repository[1]. Feel free to submit it upstream (no need to credit me; this is just copied together from xm and upstream's command list). best regards, Adi [1] https://xenbits.xen.org/git-http/xen.git -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: xl_bash_completion.diff Type: text/x-diff Size: 8083 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20190211/a1889c72/attachment-0001.diff> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://alioth-lists.debian.net/pipermail/pkg-xen-devel/attachments/20190211/a1889c72/attachment-0001.sig>
Possibly Parallel Threads
- xl / xen bash completion
- [PATCH] Add vncviewer xm compatibility options the 'xl create' command
- [PATCH 0 of 2 v2] Add vncviewer xm compatibility options
- [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] xm: Don''t spawn vncviewer twice.
- [PATCH v2] libxl: prevent xl from running if xend is running.