thr3ads.net - openssh bugs - [Bug 2521] New: subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it [Jan 2016]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-05 22:09 UTC

[Bug 2521] New: subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

            Bug ID: 2521
           Summary: subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to
                    avoid exceeding it
           Product: Portable OpenSSH
           Version: 6.8p1
          Hardware: amd64
                OS: Linux
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P5
         Component: sshd
          Assignee: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
          Reporter: olo at fb.com

Created attachment 2778
  --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2778&action=edit
The patch to rekey limit computation, based on GitHub commit 2c48eb1

I'm refiling this report in Bugzilla as a follow-up to my GitHub pull
request https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/19 (which went
largely unnoticed).

The pull request changes the way in which the rekey limit is computed
based on cipher block size to address a problem with OpenSSH going over
the intended limit.

But first, a short background story:

In 2013, Red Hat has introduced a patch for OpenSSL that adds some
additional checks to its GCM implementation:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131111/1144834.html

These checks are based on recommendations from NIST SP 800-38D:

http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/nistpubs/800-38D/SP-800-38D.pdf

Among those, section 5.2.1.1 imposes a limit on plaintext length that
amounts to 64 GiB.

At Facebook, this was causing our scp transfers larger than 64 GiB to
die with a cipher_crypt: EVP_Cipher failed error.

The check implementing this limit has been recently rolled back by Red
Hat:

https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-0772.html

The reason for dropping it is stated in the package's ChangeLog:

Thu Mar 26 2015 Tom?? Mr?z tmraz at redhat.com 1.0.1e-30.8
drop the AES-GCM restriction of 2^32 operations because the IV is
always 96 bits (32 bit fixed field + 64 bit invocation field)
According to our own analysis, the change does not remove an operations
count restriction (specified in Sec 8.3 of NIST SP 800-38D and
dependent on usage of a non-recommended IV configuration), but total
plaintext length restriction (specified in Sec 5.2.1.1, which is
unconditional).

Regardless of validity of the removed check, it has exposed what I
believe to be a bug in OpenSSH in the way that rekey limits (based on
data, instead of time) are handled.

Currently, if the rekey limit is not explicitly configured, it's
computed algorithmically based on the cipher's block size:
https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/blob/3f4ea3c9ab1d32d43c9222c4351f58ca11144156/packet.c#L1003

For a 128-bit block cipher like AES-GCM, this amounts to a limit of
exactly 64GiB - the same as the recommended by NIST.

However, since the check for exceeding the rekey limit (max_blocks_*
fields in the session state) is only performed in clientloop and
serverloop after processing a buffered batch of packets, the amount of
data encrypted/decrypted will almost always go above the limit for a
few blocks (depending on how much of them were in the buffer) before
rekeying is triggered.

In our case at Facebook, this was causing AES-GCM to go above the 64
GiB limit shortly before triggering rekeying and abort with an error,
unless a sufficiently lower RekeyLimit is explicitly set (which itself
can only be set to values less than 4GiB because of u32int being used,
but that's a different story).

My proposed fix is to deduce the maximum theoretical amount of buffered
blocks from the computed max_blocks value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-05 22:32 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

--- Comment #1 from Aleksander Adamowski <olo at fb.com> ---
BTW, this seems to rebase cleanly against today's master branch head:

https://github.com/aadamowski/openssh-portable/commit/60245fa4daec43aba8bde860fa2afab983270cc5

It does compile and sshd starts up.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-06 07:02 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2778|application/octet-stream    |text/plain
          mime type|                            |
   Attachment #2778|0                           |1
           is patch|                            |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-06 07:03 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |djm at mindrot.org,
                   |                            |dtucker at zip.com.au

--- Comment #2 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
(In reply to Aleksander Adamowski from comment #0)> I'm refiling this report in Bugzilla as a follow-up to my GitHub
> pull request https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/pull/19
> (which went largely unnoticed).
Github is just a mirror - we don't do development there (as noted in
the README). 

Darren was taking a look at this recently.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-06 17:40 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

--- Comment #3 from Aleksander Adamowski <olo at fb.com> ---
Yeah, I've noticed commit e91346d (we don't use Github for
issues/pull-requests). That's why I came here, to Bugzilla.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-08 02:33 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2778|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
   Attachment #2779|                            |ok?(djm at mindrot.org)
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #4 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> ---
Created attachment 2779
  --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2779&action=edit
Account for actual contents of buffers when calculating rekeying

Patch #2778 solves the problem with the large rekeylimit ciphers but it
still potentially leaves the problems with the others, and using the
same approach on those will rekey significantly more than requested.

An alternative patch that checks the actual buffer usage which should
be more accurate.  Can you confirm that this also solves the problem
you have observed?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-08 02:37 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2780|                            |ok?(djm at mindrot.org)
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #5 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> ---
Created attachment 2780
  --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2780&action=edit
Allow rekeylimits >4G.

I also fixed RekeyLimit to allow limits >4G (should work up to 2**63,
limited by the return value of scan_scaled).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-08 02:40 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED
           Assignee|unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org |dtucker at zip.com.au

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-08 06:45 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2779|ok?(djm at mindrot.org)        |ok+
              Flags|                            |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-08 06:46 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2780|ok?(djm at mindrot.org)        |ok+
              Flags|                            |

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-29 03:48 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Attachment #2779|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |
   Attachment #2779|                            |ok-
              Flags|                            |

--- Comment #6 from Darren Tucker <dtucker at zip.com.au> ---
Comment on attachment 2779
  --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2779
Account for actual contents of buffers when calculating rekeying

Turns out this is not correct.  It (at least) fails with very small
values of rekeylimit due to constant rekeying and no forward progress.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Jan-29 06:06 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|dtucker at zip.com.au          |djm at mindrot.org

--- Comment #7 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
Created attachment 2783
  --> https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/attachment.cgi?id=2783&action=edit
refactor rekeying logic

This is a more substantial refactoring of the rekeying logic that moves
the tests close to where packets are sent and received.

If you are able to test this (with OpenSSH git head) with very large
transfers then it would be appreciated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Feb-01 21:01 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

--- Comment #8 from Aleksander Adamowski <olo at fb.com> ---
Hi djm,

TL;DR: Good news, I've retested your refactor patch (attachment 2783
applied on top of current OpenSSH git master head) on CentOS 6 with
downgraded OpenSSL (that enforces AES-GCM 64G limit) and the refactor
does address the problem correctly.

Here's a detailed report from my test:

On CentOS 6:

---- HEAD == commit 4c6cb83, BEFORE applying patch 2783: ----

$ sudo yum downgrade openssl-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.5.x86_64
openssl-devel-1.0.1e-30.el6_6.5.x86_64

$ cd openssh-portable

$ make clean

$ ./configure --prefix=/opt/openssh-work && make && echo OK

$ sudo make install

$ mkdir -p ~/.ssh-work && chmod 700 ~/.ssh-work

$ ssh-keygen -t rsa -f ~/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key

$ cat ~/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key.pub >>
~/.ssh/authorized_keys_openssh-work; chmod 600
~/.ssh/authorized_keys_openssh-work

$ sudo perl -pe
's{(AuthorizedKeysFile\s+.ssh/authorized_keys$)}{$1_openssh-work}' -i
/opt/openssh-work/etc/sshd_config

TERM 1:
$ sudo $PWD/sshd -p 22222 -D -d -e

TERM 2:
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=65534 | pv -prb | $PWD/ssh -o
BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=15 -o ServerAliveInterval=15 -o
TCPKeepAlive=yes -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -c aes256-gcm at openssh.com
-p 22222 -i ~/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key -v localhost 'cat >
/dev/null'
2>&1 | awk '{ print strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"), $0;
fflush(); }'



2016-02-01 12:14:51 OpenSSH_7.1p2, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Reading configuration data
/opt/openssh-work/etc/ssh_config
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Connecting to localhost [::1] port 22222.
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: fd 3 clearing O_NONBLOCK
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Connection established.
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: identity file
/home/olo/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key type 1
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: identity file
/home/olo/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key-cert type -1
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol
2.0
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.1
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote
software version OpenSSH_7.1
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: match: OpenSSH_7.1 pat OpenSSH* compat
0x04000000
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Authenticating to localhost:22222 as 'olo'
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: kex: algorithm:
curve25519-sha256 at libssh.org
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: kex: host key algorithm:
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: kex: server->client cipher:
aes256-gcm at openssh.com MAC: <implicit> compression: none
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: kex: client->server cipher:
aes256-gcm at openssh.com MAC: <implicit> compression: none
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Server host key: ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
SHA256:1t75itcZmuKxHOZDYnf2rFChaodNSPb03bqjWrddgAw
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Host '[localhost]:22222' is known and
matches the ECDSA host key.
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Found key in /home/olo/.ssh/known_hosts:31
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: rekey after 4294967296 blocks
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: rekey after 4294967296 blocks
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: SSH2_MSG_EXT_INFO received
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: kex_input_ext_info:
server-sig-algs=<rsa-sha2-256,rsa-sha2-512>
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Offering RSA public key: rsa w/o comment
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Offering RSA-CERT public key: rsa w/o
comment
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Offering RSA public key:
/home/olo/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg rsa-sha2-512 blen
279
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
2016-02-01 12:14:51 Authenticated to localhost ([::1]:22222).
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Requesting no-more-sessions at openssh.com
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Entering interactive session.
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: pledge: network
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: client_input_global_request: rtype
hostkeys-00 at openssh.com want_reply 0
2016-02-01 12:14:51 debug1: Sending command: cat > /dev/null
2016-02-01 12:14:51 Environment:
2016-02-01 12:14:51   USER=olo
2016-02-01 12:14:51   LOGNAME=olo
2016-02-01 12:14:51   HOME=/home/olo
2016-02-01 12:14:51  
PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/openssh-work/bin
2016-02-01 12:14:51   MAIL=/var/mail/olo
2016-02-01 12:14:51   SHELL=/bin/bash
2016-02-01 12:14:51   SSH_CLIENT=::1 54347 22222
2016-02-01 12:14:51   SSH_CONNECTION=::1 54347 ::1 22222
2016-02-01 12:17:46 ssh_packet_send: error in libcrypto                
                        <=>                                            
                               ]
63.9GiB [ 373MiB/s] [                                                  
                     <=>


---- HEAD == commit 4c6cb83, AFTER applying patch 2783: ----


$patch  -p1 < ../openssh-rekeylimit-patch_2783.patch

patching file clientloop.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1501 (offset 10 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1616 (offset 10 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1655 (offset 10 lines).
patching file kex.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 606 (offset 21 lines).
patching file kex.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 179 (offset 14 lines).
patching file opacket.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 125 (offset 1 line).
patching file packet.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 259 (offset 6 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1035 (offset 11 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1283 (offset 11 lines).
Hunk #4 succeeded at 1351 (offset 11 lines).
Hunk #5 succeeded at 1871 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #6 succeeded at 2362 (offset 20 lines).
patching file packet.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 86 (offset 14 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 146 (offset 14 lines).
patching file serverloop.c
Hunk #1 succeeded at 820 (offset 32 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 847 (offset 32 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 866 (offset 32 lines).

$ make && echo OK

$ sudo make install

$ sudo perl -pe
's{(AuthorizedKeysFile\s+.ssh/authorized_keys$)}{$1_openssh-work}' -i
/opt/openssh-work/etc/sshd_config


TERM 1:
$ sudo $PWD/sshd -p 22222 -D -d -e

TERM 2:
$ dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=65534 | pv -prb | $PWD/ssh -o
BatchMode=yes -o ConnectTimeout=15 -o ServerAliveInterval=15 -o
TCPKeepAlive=yes -o StrictHostKeyChecking=no -c aes256-gcm at openssh.com
-p 22222 -i ~/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key -v localhost 'cat >
/dev/null'
2>&1 | awk '{ print strftime("%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"), $0;
fflush(); }'

2016-02-01 12:34:00 OpenSSH_7.1p2, OpenSSL 1.0.1e-fips 11 Feb 2013
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Reading configuration data
/opt/openssh-work/etc/ssh_config
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Connecting to localhost [::1] port 22222.
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: fd 3 clearing O_NONBLOCK
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Connection established.
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: identity file
/home/olo/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key type 1
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: key_load_public: No such file or directory
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: identity file
/home/olo/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key-cert type -1
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol
2.0
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_7.1
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote
software version OpenSSH_7.1
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: match: OpenSSH_7.1 pat OpenSSH* compat
0x04000000
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Authenticating to localhost:22222 as 'olo'
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: kex: algorithm:
curve25519-sha256 at libssh.org
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: kex: host key algorithm:
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: kex: server->client cipher:
aes256-gcm at openssh.com MAC: <implicit> compression: none
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: kex: client->server cipher:
aes256-gcm at openssh.com MAC: <implicit> compression: none
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Server host key: ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
SHA256:1t75itcZmuKxHOZDYnf2rFChaodNSPb03bqjWrddgAw
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Host '[localhost]:22222' is known and
matches the ECDSA host key.
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Found key in /home/olo/.ssh/known_hosts:31
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: rekey after 4294967296 blocks
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: rekey after 4294967296 blocks
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: SSH2_MSG_EXT_INFO received
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: kex_input_ext_info:
server-sig-algs=<rsa-sha2-256,rsa-sha2-512>
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Next authentication method: publickey
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Offering RSA public key: rsa w/o comment
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Offering RSA-CERT public key: rsa w/o
comment
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Authentications that can continue:
publickey,password,keyboard-interactive
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Offering RSA public key:
/home/olo/.ssh-work/openssh-work.key
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Server accepts key: pkalg rsa-sha2-512 blen
279
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Authentication succeeded (publickey).
2016-02-01 12:34:00 Authenticated to localhost ([::1]:22222).
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: channel 0: new [client-session]
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Requesting no-more-sessions at openssh.com
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Entering interactive session.
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: pledge: network
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: client_input_global_request: rtype
hostkeys-00 at openssh.com want_reply 0
2016-02-01 12:34:00 debug1: Sending command: cat > /dev/null
2016-02-01 12:34:00 Environment:
2016-02-01 12:34:00   USER=olo
2016-02-01 12:34:00   LOGNAME=olo
2016-02-01 12:34:00   HOME=/home/olo
2016-02-01 12:34:00  
PATH=/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/openssh-work/bin
2016-02-01 12:34:00   MAIL=/var/mail/olo
2016-02-01 12:34:00   SHELL=/bin/bash
2016-02-01 12:34:00   SSH_CLIENT=::1 58502 22222
2016-02-01 12:34:00   SSH_CONNECTION=::1 58502 ::1 22222
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: enqueue packet: 94                         
                                                           <=>         
                                                                       
                                                                       
                           ]
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: kex: algorithm:
curve25519-sha256 at libssh.org
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: kex: host key algorithm:
ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: kex: server->client cipher:
aes256-gcm at openssh.com MAC: <implicit> compression: none
2016-02-01 12:37:01 debug1: kex: client->server cipher:
aes256-gcm at openssh.com MAC: <implicit> compression: none
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_ECDH_REPLY
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: rekeying in progress
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: Server host key: ecdsa-sha2-nistp256
SHA256:1t75itcZmuKxHOZDYnf2rFChaodNSPb03bqjWrddgAw
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: set_newkeys: rekeying, input 11977700 bytes
598858 blocks, output 68735982040 bytes 0 blocks
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: rekey after 4294967296 blocks
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: dequeue packet: 94
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: set_newkeys: rekeying, input 11977720 bytes
0 blocks, output 68735998444 bytes 1025 blocks
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: rekey after 4294967296 blocks
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received
65534+0 records in
65534+0 records out
68717379584 bytes (69 GB) copied, 181.469 s, 379 MB/s
  64GiB [ 361MiB/s] [                                                  
                                                     <=>               
                                                                       
                                                                       
                           ]
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: client_input_channel_req: channel 0 rtype
exit-status reply 0
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: channel 0: free: client-session, nchannels
1
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: fd 0 clearing O_NONBLOCK
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: fd 1 clearing O_NONBLOCK
2016-02-01 12:37:02 Transferred: sent 68801270052, received 11989156
bytes, in 181.4 seconds
2016-02-01 12:37:02 Bytes per second: sent 379342485.6, received
66103.4
2016-02-01 12:37:02 debug1: Exit status 0



Note that this time SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT is triggered on time, before going
over the limit and therefore the transfer succeeds (no
"ssh_packet_send: error in libcrypto" error).

The test above doesn't really go over the limit, transferring slightly
less than 64G, but I've repeated it with "dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M
count=70000" and it also goes through smoothly (the log looks the
same).

I've also tested with a small RekeyLimit to verify that ssh is able to
make progress (dd if=/dev/zero bs=1M count=8 | ... | $PWD/ssh -o
RekeyLimit=128K ...) and it is.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2016-Feb-08 11:00 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |RESOLVED
             Blocks|                            |2451
         Resolution|---                         |FIXED

--- Comment #9 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
Fix applied, this will be in OpenSSH 7.2

commit 19bcf2ea2d17413f2d9730dd2a19575ff86b9b6a
Author: djm at openbsd.org <djm at openbsd.org>
Date:   Mon Feb 8 10:57:07 2016 +0000

    upstream commit

    refactor activation of rekeying

    This makes automatic rekeying internal to the packet code
(previously
    the server and client loops needed to assist). In doing to it makes
    application of rekey limits more accurate by accounting for packets
    about to be sent as well as packets queued during rekeying events
    themselves.

    Based on a patch from dtucker@ which was in turn based on a patch
    Aleksander Adamowski in bz#2521; ok markus@

    Upstream-ID: a441227fd64f9739850ca97b4cf794202860fcd8


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2451
[Bug 2451] Bugs intended to be fixed in 7.2
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.

bugzilla-daemon at bugzilla.mindrot.org

2018-Apr-06 02:26 UTC

head link

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2521

Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |CLOSED

--- Comment #10 from Damien Miller <djm at mindrot.org> ---
Close all resolved bugs after release of OpenSSH 7.7.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

Maybe Matching Threads

Search for more apparently analagous threads

openssh bugs - Jan 2016 - [Bug 2521] New: subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] New: subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

[Bug 2521] subtract buffer size from computed rekey limit to avoid exceeding it

Maybe Matching Threads