Enna1 via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-10 10:39 UTC
[llvm-dev] Question about the example of link time optimization
Hi all! I played around with the LLVM LTO example(https://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html#example-of-link-time-optimization), but got some questions. As the document says, the function foo4 should be removed. However, under my test, function foo4 is not removed. I have tried both gnu ld with LLVMgold.so and lld, neither of them removes function foo4. I compile and run the example as instructed: % clang -flto -c a.c -o a.o # <-- a.o is LLVM bitcode file % clang -c main.c -o main.o # <-- main.o is native object file % clang -flto a.o main.o -o main # <-- standard link command with -flto % readelf -sW ./main | awk '$4 == "FUNC"' 1: 0000000000000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND printf at GLIBC_2.2.5 (2) 2: 0000000000000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND __libc_start_main at GLIBC_2.2.5 (2) 27: 0000000000400440 0 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 13 deregister_tm_clones 28: 0000000000400470 0 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 13 register_tm_clones 29: 00000000004004b0 0 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 13 __do_global_dtors_aux 32: 00000000004004e0 0 FUNC LOCAL DEFAULT 13 frame_dummy 43: 00000000004005c0 2 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 13 __libc_csu_fini 46: 00000000004005c4 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 14 _fini 47: 0000000000000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND printf@@GLIBC_2.2.5 48: 0000000000400510 23 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 13 foo4 49: 0000000000000000 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT UND __libc_start_main@@GLIBC_2.2.5 54: 0000000000400550 101 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 13 __libc_csu_init 56: 0000000000400430 2 FUNC GLOBAL HIDDEN 13 _dl_relocate_static_pie 57: 0000000000400400 43 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 13 _start 59: 0000000000400530 26 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 13 main 60: 00000000004004f0 25 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 13 foo1 62: 00000000004003c8 0 FUNC GLOBAL DEFAULT 11 _init Is there something that I'm doing wrong? Here is the source code of a.c and main.c: --- a.h --- extern int foo1(void); extern void foo2(void); extern void foo4(void); --- a.c --- #include "a.h" static signed int i = 0; void foo2(void) { i = -1; } static int foo3() { foo4(); return 10; } int foo1(void) { int data = 0; if (i < 0) data = foo3(); data = data + 42; return data; } --- main.c --- #include <stdio.h> #include "a.h" void foo4(void) { printf("Hi\n"); } int main() { return foo1(); } Thanks! Xu Mingjie
Florian Hahn via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-11 17:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] Question about the example of link time optimization
> On Oct 10, 2020, at 11:39, Enna1 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi all! > > I played around with the LLVM LTO > example(https://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html#example-of-link-time-optimization), > but got some questions. > > As the document says, the function foo4 should be removed. However, > under my test, function foo4 is not removed. > I have tried both gnu ld with LLVMgold.so and lld, neither of them > removes function foo4. > > I compile and run the example as instructed: > % clang -flto -c a.c -o a.o # <-- a.o is LLVM bitcode file > % clang -c main.c -o main.o # <-- main.o is native object fileI think you also need to build main.c with -flto. Cheers, Florian
Fangrui Song via llvm-dev
2020-Oct-11 21:15 UTC
[llvm-dev] Question about the example of link time optimization
On 2020-10-11, Florian Hahn via llvm-dev wrote:> > >> On Oct 10, 2020, at 11:39, Enna1 via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi all! >> >> I played around with the LLVM LTO >> example(https://llvm.org/docs/LinkTimeOptimization.html#example-of-link-time-optimization), >> but got some questions. >> >> As the document says, the function foo4 should be removed. However, >> under my test, function foo4 is not removed. >> I have tried both gnu ld with LLVMgold.so and lld, neither of them >> removes function foo4. >> >> I compile and run the example as instructed: >> % clang -flto -c a.c -o a.o # <-- a.o is LLVM bitcode file >> % clang -c main.c -o main.o # <-- main.o is native object file > > >I think you also need to build main.c with -flto. > >Cheers, >FlorianMore details: main.o is a regular object file. The symbols referenced (foo4) need to be exported by LTO: the 'VisibileToRegularObj' property of foo4 is true because foo4's isUsedInRegularObj is true.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- Depends/Imports/Suggest/Enhence
- [LLVMdev] Failure while calling a function in GDB session
- Running imaptest revision 209:939fa886391a built against dovecot revision 9116:9ae55b68cf61 on AIX 5.3 core dumps
- How to debug if LTO generate wrong code?
- [LLVMdev] llvmc doesn't work for compilation nor linking