Ejjeh, Adel via llvm-dev
2020-Apr-28 19:57 UTC
[llvm-dev] Function attributes for memory side-effects
Hi All I am writing a pass which requires checking dependences, and am having trouble dealing with function calls. Specifically, I want to be able to know when a called function does not have any side effects (e.g. math library functions like sqrt), and was wondering if there are attributes that specify this behavior (I know there is the ‘noread’ attribute but wasn’t sure if there’s something similar for writes)? Also, how can I tell clang to generate those attributes at the function declaration? Any information would be helpful. Thanks -Adel Ejjeh -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200428/883946b2/attachment.html>
Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev
2020-Apr-29 21:12 UTC
[llvm-dev] Function attributes for memory side-effects
On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:58 PM Ejjeh, Adel via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Specifically, I want to be able to know when a called function does not > have any side effects (e.g. math library functions like sqrt) >Apologies for the pedantry, but I believe sqrt may set errno, so it actually can have side effects. :( See -fno-math-errno and the documentation around it.> , and was wondering if there are attributes that specify this behavior (I > know there is the ‘noread’ attribute but wasn’t sure if there’s something > similar for writes)? Also, how can I tell clang to generate those > attributes at the function declaration? Any information would be helpful. >Yep, I believe the IR attributes are `readonly` and `readnone`. Readonly implies no side effects (no writes), and readnone implies no memory dependencies at all. The return value is a pure function of the arguments. Two calls with the same arguments can be folded together. There are a couple of passes (Attributor, FunctionAttrs, I'm not up-to-date) that will infer these attributes if they can see a precise definition of the function body. Learning anything interesting usually requires expanding the scope of analysis with LTO, so these passes can look across translation unit boundaries. HTH -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20200429/2cfb5e6e/attachment.html>
Johannes Doerfert via llvm-dev
2020-Apr-30 15:34 UTC
[llvm-dev] Function attributes for memory side-effects
On 4/29/20 4:12 PM, Reid Kleckner via llvm-dev wrote: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 12:58 PM Ejjeh, Adel via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> Specifically, I want to be able to know when a called function does not >> have any side effects (e.g. math library functions like sqrt) >> > > Apologies for the pedantry, but I believe sqrt may set errno, so it > actually can have side effects. :( See -fno-math-errno and the > documentation around it. > > >> , and was wondering if there are attributes that specify this behavior (I >> know there is the ‘noread’ attribute but wasn’t sure if there’s something >> similar for writes)? Also, how can I tell clang to generate those >> attributes at the function declaration? Any information would be helpful. >> > > Yep, I believe the IR attributes are `readonly` and `readnone`. Readonly > implies no side effects (no writes), and readnone implies no memory > dependencies at all. The return value is a pure function of the arguments. > Two calls with the same arguments can be folded together. > > There are a couple of passes (Attributor, FunctionAttrs, I'm not > up-to-date) that will infer these attributes if they can see a precise > definition of the function body. Learning anything interesting usually > requires expanding the scope of analysis with LTO, so these passes can look > across translation unit boundaries. Often true. In case of library functions we actually "know" the side effects and will add the appropriate attributes. As you said, fast math flags are needed for math library functions that may otherwise write errno. The full list of attributes we have so far is: access locations: `readnone`, `inaccessiblememonly`, `argmemonly`, and `inaccessiblemem_or_argmemonly` and access "kinds": `readonly` and `writeonly` Except for `readnone` you can combine a location attribute with a "kind" or have one of either alone. The Attributor does internally derive more "locations", basically any combination of: local memory constant memory internal global memory external global memory argument memory inaccessible memory malloced memory (returned by a function with the `noalias` return attribute) unknown memory I want to add some/all of these as attributes but didn't find the time yet. Cheers, Johannes > > HTH > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
Maybe Matching Threads
- Function attributes for memory side-effects
- LLVM pass to optimize redundant branch conditions
- Incorrect behavior in the LLVM dependence analyzer
- Bug in pass 'ipsccp' on function attribute 'argmemonly'?
- Accessing Function analyses in a Module pass with the new pass manager