Qiu Chaofan via llvm-dev
2019-Apr-16 15:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] What is stack pointer adjustment on scheduling?
Hi there, I'm planning to implement a prototype about scheduling across calls in LLVM as my school project. When I look into MachineScheduler.cpp, I found this piece of comments for `isSchedBoundary`: > MachineScheduler does not currently support scheduling across calls. > To handle calls, the DAG builder needs to be modified to create > register anti/output dependencies on the registers clobbered by the > call's regmask operand. In PreRA scheduling, the stack pointer > adjustment already prevents scheduling across calls. In PostRA > scheduling, we need the isCall to enforce the boundary, but there > would be no benefit to postRA scheduling across calls this late > anyway. What I'm not sure about is the 'stack pointer adjustment'. What is it? Is it the stack protector or some stuff about the calling convention? And how does it prevents scheduling across calls? Thanks, Chaofan
Tim Northover via llvm-dev
2019-Apr-16 18:08 UTC
[llvm-dev] What is stack pointer adjustment on scheduling?
Hi Chaofan, On Tue, 16 Apr 2019 at 16:27, Qiu Chaofan via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> What I'm not sure about is the 'stack pointer adjustment'. What is it?I'm not certain, but my best guess is that it's referring to the instructions most targets call "ADJCALLSTACKDOWN" and "ADJCALLSTACKUP". They are defined within each target, and surround any call sequence to tell the code allocating stack slots how much is needed for that call's parameters. They're marked as using and defining SP.> And how does it prevents scheduling across calls?Mechanically, it's through the call to TLI.isSchedulingBoundary, which disallows any instruction that modifies SP. The reasoning is explained a little more in the body of TargetInstrInfo::isSchedulingBoundary, and makes it sound like simply opening that up without thought wouldn't be a great idea. Cheers. Tim.