Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-08 01:33 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 5:03 PM Heejin Ahn via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Hello David, > > I use x86_64 and it works on my machine. I also can't find this error on > LLVM buildbot page. I'd appreciate if you help me reproduce the problem. I > tested with debug/release/expensive-check builds and they all passed. Does > anyone else have this problem? > > Regards, > Heejin > > On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 10:11 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > >> I'm seeing the following fail on Linux x86-64, for the last couple weeks >> at least. This is from 'ninja check-all'. >> >> -David >> >> FAIL: lld :: wasm/function-index.test (1941 of 1955) >> ******************** TEST 'lld :: wasm/function-index.test' FAILED >> ******************** >> Script: >> -- >> : 'RUN: at line 1'; /build/x86_64/bin/llc -filetype=obj >> /src/lld/test/wasm/Inputs/ret32.ll -o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret32.o >> : 'RUN: at line 2'; /build/x86_64/bin/llc -filetype=obj >> /src/lld/test/wasm/Inputs/ret64.ll -o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret64.o >> : 'RUN: at line 3'; /build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld -r -o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.wasm >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret32.o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret64.o >> : 'RUN: at line 4'; /build/x86_64/bin/obj2yaml >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.wasm | >> /build/x86_64/bin/FileCheck /src/lld/test/wasm/function-index.test >> -- >> Exit Code: 139 >> >> Command Output (stderr): >> -- >> + : 'RUN: at line 1' >> + /build/x86_64/bin/llc -filetype=obj /src/lld/test/wasm/Inputs/ret32.ll >> -o /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret32.o >> + : 'RUN: at line 2' >> + /build/x86_64/bin/llc -filetype=obj /src/lld/test/wasm/Inputs/ret64.ll >> -o /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret64.o >> + : 'RUN: at line 3' >> + /build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld -r -o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.wasm >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret32.o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret64.o >> Stack dump: >> 0. Program arguments: /build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld -r -o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.wasm >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret32.o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret64.o >> #0 0x0000000000571d1a llvm::sys::PrintStackTrace(llvm::raw_ostream&) >> (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x571d1a) >> #1 0x000000000056f538 llvm::sys::RunSignalHandlers() >> (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x56f538) >> #2 0x000000000056f64c SignalHandler(int) >> (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x56f64c) >> #3 0x00007f7578656b00 __restore_rt (/lib64/libpthread.so.0+0x10b00) >> #4 0x00000000005b618b >> llvm::SpecificBumpPtrAllocator<std::unique_ptr<llvm::MemoryBuffer, >> std::default_delete<llvm::MemoryBuffer> > >::DestroyAll() >> (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x5b618b) >> #5 0x000000000091af30 lld::freeArena() >> (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x91af30) >> #6 0x00000000007b9e5c lld::wasm::link(llvm::ArrayRef<char const*>, bool, >> llvm::raw_ostream&) (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x7b9e5c) >> #7 0x00000000004a67cf main (/build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld+0x4a67cf) >> #8 0x00007f7576e656e5 __libc_start_main (/lib64/libc.so.6+0x206e5) >> #9 0x0000000000557729 _start >> /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.22/csu/../sysdeps/x86_64/start.S:121:0 >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.script: line >> 4: 368695 Segmentation fault /build/x86_64/bin/wasm-ld -r -o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.wasm >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret32.o >> /build/x86_64/tools/lld/test/wasm/Output/function-index.test.tmp.ret64.o >> >> -David >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org >> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >> > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190107/00c120b7/attachment.html>
David Greene via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-08 15:21 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes:> I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. > > David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky?It's every time for me, both on X86-64 and AArch64. I'll try running in a debugger to see what is going on. What else can I do to help track this down? -David
Rui Ueyama via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-08 17:13 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:21 AM David Greene <dag at cray.com> wrote:> Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > > > I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. > > > > David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? > > It's every time for me, both on X86-64 and AArch64. I'll try running in > a debugger to see what is going on. What else can I do to help track > this down?Maybe first I would try building again with a fresh build directory to see if it still persists. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190108/ebdd35eb/attachment.html>
Derek Schuff via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-08 17:14 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
Are you using static linking, -DBUILD_SHARED_LIBS, or -DLLVM_LINK_LLVM_DYLIB? On Tue, Jan 8, 2019 at 7:21 AM David Greene via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > > > I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. > > > > David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? > > It's every time for me, both on X86-64 and AArch64. I'll try running in > a debugger to see what is going on. What else can I do to help track > this down? > > -David > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20190108/b9a636a1/attachment.html>
David Greene via llvm-dev
2019-Jan-08 19:19 UTC
[llvm-dev] [LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
David Greene via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes:> Rui Ueyama <ruiu at google.com> writes: > >> I cannot reproduce this error, but this could be real. >> >> David, is this reproducible every time or is this flaky? > > It's every time for me, both on X86-64 and AArch64. I'll try running in > a debugger to see what is going on. What else can I do to help track > this down?Ok, I discovered something interesting. I see the failure when configuring like this: cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON \ -DLLVM_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS=WITH_ASSERTS ... I do *not* see the failure when configuring like this: cmake -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Debug -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=ON \ -DLLVM_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS=WITH_ASSERTS ... I set LLVM_ABI_BREAKING_CHECKS=FORCE_OFF for the Release build in CMakeCache.txt and it still failed. I then additionally set LLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=OFF for the Release build in CMakeCache.txt and it still failed. I then attempted to run the command in a debugger. It passed. It also passed on the command-line. So it appears something about the environment lit sets up causes problems, but only for Release builds. I tried adding a batch gdb command to the test but it passed. The test doesn't run long enough to allow attaching an external gdb. So short of hacking on wasm-ld, I'm at a bit of a roadblock. Ideas welcome. :) -David
Maybe Matching Threads
- LLVM-3.8.0 libcxx in-tree build fails with cmath error ::signbit has not been declared
- Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?
- LLVM-3.8.0 libcxx in-tree build fails with cmath error ::signbit has not been declared
- [LLD] [WASM] wasm/function-index.test failing
- Slow IR compilation/JIT, profiling points to LLVM?