Rai, Deepali via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-16 08:44 UTC
[llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple loop
I have modified the example test case for UB error, still it didn’t unroll
void foo(int x) {
int p, i = 1;
int mat[9][9][9];
for (p = (x+1) ; p < (x+3) ;p++)
mat[x][p-1][i] = mat[x][p-1][i] + 5;
}
Regard,
Deepali
From: Kevin Choi [mailto:code.kchoi at gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 1:20 PM
To: Rai, Deepali
Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple loop
void foo(int x) {
int p, i = 1;
int mat[6][6][6];
for (p = x+3 ; p<= x+6 ;p++)
mat[x][p][i] = mat[x][p][i] + 5;
}
When x=0, max(p)=6, which is outside of allocated 3d array, which is UB.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Rai, Deepali via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at
lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to unroll the below loop, but couldn’t as SCEV returns TripCount as
0.
void foo(int x) {
int p, i = 1;
int mat[6][6][6];
for (p = x+3 ; p<= x+6 ;p++)
mat[x][p][i] = mat[x][p][i] + 5;
}
For a quick reference I have added the generated IR compiled with clang using
–O3.
Please let me know if this is an known issue in SCEV or I am missing something
here ?
; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone uwtable
define void @_Z3fooi(i32 %x) local_unnamed_addr #0 {
entry:
%mat = alloca [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]], align 16
%0 = bitcast [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]]* %mat to i8*
call void @llvm.lifetime.start(i64 864, i8* %0) #2
%add = add nsw i32 %x, 3
%add1 = add nsw i32 %x, 6
%idxprom3 = sext i32 %x to i64
%1 = sext i32 %add to i64
%2 = sext i32 %add1 to i64
br label %for.body
for.body: ; preds = %for.body, %entry
%indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ], [ %1, %entry ]
%arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]], [6 x [6 x [6 x
i32]]]* %mat, i64 0, i64 %idxprom3, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 1
%3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5, align 4, !tbaa !1
%add6 = add nsw i32 %3, 5
store i32 %add6, i32* %arrayidx5, align 4, !tbaa !1
%indvars.iv.next = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1
%cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv, %2
br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end
for.end: ; preds = %for.body
call void @llvm.lifetime.end(i64 864, i8* nonnull %0) #2
ret void
}
Thanks,
Deepali
_______________________________________________
LLVM Developers mailing list
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org<mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160916/bce97898/attachment.html>
Philip Pfaffe via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-16 11:45 UTC
[llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple loop
There is no way to express the trip count in a closed expression. E.g., if I call foo(MAX_INT - 2), the loop condition will evaluate to false immediately. Best, Philip 2016-09-16 10:44 GMT+02:00 Rai, Deepali via llvm-dev < llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>:> I have modified the example test case for UB error, still it didn’t unroll > > > > void foo(int x) { > > int p, i = 1; > > int mat[9][9][9]; > > for (p = (x+1) ; p < (x+3) ;p++) > > mat[x][p-1][i] = mat[x][p-1][i] + 5; > > } > > > > Regard, > > Deepali > > > > *From:* Kevin Choi [mailto:code.kchoi at gmail.com] > *Sent:* Friday, September 16, 2016 1:20 PM > *To:* Rai, Deepali > *Cc:* llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > *Subject:* Re: [llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple > loop > > > > void foo(int x) { > > int p, i = 1; > > int mat[6][6][6]; > > for (p = x+3 ; p<= x+6 ;p++) > > mat[x][p][i] = mat[x][p][i] + 5; > > } > > > > When x=0, max(p)=6, which is outside of allocated 3d array, which is UB. > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Rai, Deepali via llvm-dev < > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to unroll the below loop, but couldn’t as SCEV returns > TripCount as 0. > > > > void foo(int x) { > > int p, i = 1; > > int mat[6][6][6]; > > for (p = x+3 ; p<= x+6 ;p++) > > mat[x][p][i] = mat[x][p][i] + 5; > > } > > > > For a quick reference I have added the generated IR compiled with clang > using –O3. > > Please let me know if this is an known issue in SCEV or I am missing > something here ? > > > > ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone uwtable > > define void @_Z3fooi(i32 %x) local_unnamed_addr #0 { > > entry: > > %mat = alloca [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]], align 16 > > %0 = bitcast [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]]* %mat to i8* > > call void @llvm.lifetime.start(i64 864, i8* %0) #2 > > %add = add nsw i32 %x, 3 > > %add1 = add nsw i32 %x, 6 > > %idxprom3 = sext i32 %x to i64 > > %1 = sext i32 %add to i64 > > %2 = sext i32 %add1 to i64 > > br label %for.body > > > > for.body: ; preds = %for.body, > %entry > > %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ], [ %1, %entry ] > > %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]], [6 x [6 x [6 > x i32]]]* %mat, i64 0, i64 %idxprom3, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 1 > > %3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5, align 4, !tbaa !1 > > %add6 = add nsw i32 %3, 5 > > store i32 %add6, i32* %arrayidx5, align 4, !tbaa !1 > > %indvars.iv.next = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 > > %cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv, %2 > > br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end > > > > for.end: ; preds = %for.body > > call void @llvm.lifetime.end(i64 864, i8* nonnull %0) #2 > > ret void > > } > > > > Thanks, > > Deepali > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160916/1562f49b/attachment.html>
Mehdi Amini via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-16 20:02 UTC
[llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple loop
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 4:45 AM, Philip Pfaffe via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > There is no way to express the trip count in a closed expression. > > E.g., if I call foo(MAX_INT - 2), the loop condition will evaluate to false immediately.Are you implying that because of wrapping? Signed integer wrapping is UB. — Mehdi> > Best, > Philip > > 2016-09-16 10:44 GMT+02:00 Rai, Deepali via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>>: > I have modified the example test case for UB error, still it didn’t unroll > > > > void foo(int x) { > > int p, i = 1; > > int mat[9][9][9]; > > for (p = (x+1) ; p < (x+3) ;p++) > > mat[x][p-1][i] = mat[x][p-1][i] + 5; > > } > > > > Regard, > > Deepali > > > > From: Kevin Choi [mailto:code.kchoi at gmail.com <mailto:code.kchoi at gmail.com>] > Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 1:20 PM > To: Rai, Deepali > Cc: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > Subject: Re: [llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple loop > > > > void foo(int x) { > > int p, i = 1; > > int mat[6][6][6]; > > for (p = x+3 ; p<= x+6 ;p++) > > mat[x][p][i] = mat[x][p][i] + 5; > > } > > > > When x=0, max(p)=6, which is outside of allocated 3d array, which is UB. > > > > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 12:31 AM, Rai, Deepali via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I am trying to unroll the below loop, but couldn’t as SCEV returns TripCount as 0. > > > > void foo(int x) { > > int p, i = 1; > > int mat[6][6][6]; > > for (p = x+3 ; p<= x+6 ;p++) > > mat[x][p][i] = mat[x][p][i] + 5; > > } > > > > For a quick reference I have added the generated IR compiled with clang using –O3. > > Please let me know if this is an known issue in SCEV or I am missing something here ? > > > > ; Function Attrs: nounwind readnone uwtable > > define void @_Z3fooi(i32 %x) local_unnamed_addr #0 { > > entry: > > %mat = alloca [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]], align 16 > > %0 = bitcast [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]]* %mat to i8* > > call void @llvm.lifetime.start(i64 864, i8* %0) #2 > > %add = add nsw i32 %x, 3 > > %add1 = add nsw i32 %x, 6 > > %idxprom3 = sext i32 %x to i64 > > %1 = sext i32 %add to i64 > > %2 = sext i32 %add1 to i64 > > br label %for.body > > > > for.body: ; preds = %for.body, %entry > > %indvars.iv = phi i64 [ %indvars.iv.next, %for.body ], [ %1, %entry ] > > %arrayidx5 = getelementptr inbounds [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]], [6 x [6 x [6 x i32]]]* %mat, i64 0, i64 %idxprom3, i64 %indvars.iv, i64 1 > > %3 = load i32, i32* %arrayidx5, align 4, !tbaa !1 > > %add6 = add nsw i32 %3, 5 > > store i32 %add6, i32* %arrayidx5, align 4, !tbaa !1 > > %indvars.iv.next = add nsw i64 %indvars.iv, 1 > > %cmp = icmp slt i64 %indvars.iv, %2 > > br i1 %cmp, label %for.body, label %for.end > > > > for.end: ; preds = %for.body > > call void @llvm.lifetime.end(i64 864, i8* nonnull %0) #2 > > ret void > > } > > > > Thanks, > > Deepali > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> > > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev <http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev> > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org > http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/llvm-dev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160916/5a40c9ec/attachment.html>
Sanjoy Das via llvm-dev
2016-Sep-16 20:27 UTC
[llvm-dev] SCEV cannot compute the trip count of Simple loop
Hi Deepali, SCEV reports the backedge taken count as "((-1 * (sext i32 (3 + %x) to i64))<nsw> + ((sext i32 (3 + %x) to i64) smax (sext i32 (6 + %x) to i64)))", so symbolically it does have an answer. Ideally SCEV should be able to exploit <nsw> on (3 + %x) and (6 + %x) to fold the expression above to "3", but due to some systemic issues SCEV can't exploit <nsw> as aggressively as we should. Without exploiting <nsw> the trip count is 2^32, which does not fit in an 32 bit unsigned integer. This is why getSmallConstantTripCount returns 0. Does this answer your question? -- Sanjoy