Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2015-Nov-22 14:32 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -rc2 has been tagged
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:09 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 22 November 2015 at 03:59, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > Should I expect the "-openmp" to work for this RC? > > Only if it worked before on the target you're building to in 3.7.0. >Ok, I'll check if I can get it to work on 3.7.0.> > > I got a link error (only > > in phase 3?). Maybe the fact that it happened in phase 3 suggests some > > hardware malfunction of mine? Or are there tests executed on phase 3 that > > aren't attempted on earlier phases? > > Is this related to the OpenMP? Or a link error in Clang? > >AFAICT it's an OpenMP link error (that I got when running "test-release.sh" with -openmp). -- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151122/60241dd9/attachment.html>
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2015-Nov-22 14:40 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -rc2 has been tagged
On 22 November 2015 at 14:32, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote:> AFAICT it's an OpenMP link error (that I got when running "test-release.sh" > with -openmp).Right. In that case, don't worry too much. The default release doesn't come with OpenMP, so unless you *want* and know it *works*, you don't need it. cheers, --renato
Brian Cain via llvm-dev
2015-Nov-22 21:58 UTC
[llvm-dev] [cfe-dev] [3.7.1 Release] -rc2 has been tagged
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> On 22 November 2015 at 14:32, Brian Cain <brian.cain at gmail.com> wrote: > > AFAICT it's an OpenMP link error (that I got when running > "test-release.sh" > > with -openmp). > > Right. In that case, don't worry too much. > > The default release doesn't come with OpenMP, so unless you *want* and > know it *works*, you don't need it. > >Well, I preferred that my build would include openmp but didn't know whether it worked, so was just checking. So without openmp, I get nonzero "unexpected failures". It's fewer failures than I saw on RC1 though. $ clang --version clang version 3.8.0 (http://llvm.org/git/clang.git 6b6df26f3b3b96552353a593bdc93333cf9ea6c3) (http://llvm.org/git/llvm.git 43928f790962f5f6d796416ae8c90b95efeaf01a) Target: armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /opt/clang-latest/bin ... Expected Passes : 22688 Expected Failures : 141 Unsupported Tests : 422 Unexpected Passes : 13 Unexpected Failures: 31 ... ******************** Failing Tests (31): libc++abi :: catch_array_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_array_02.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_class_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_class_02.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_class_03.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_class_04.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_const_pointer_nullptr.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_function_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_function_02.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_in_noexcept.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_member_data_pointer_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_member_function_pointer_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_member_pointer_nullptr.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_multi_level_pointer.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_pointer_nullptr.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_pointer_reference.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_ptr.pass.cpp libc++abi :: catch_ptr_02.pass.cpp libc++abi :: inherited_exception.pass.cpp libc++abi :: test_aux_runtime.pass.cpp libc++abi :: test_aux_runtime_op_array_new.pass.cpp libc++abi :: test_guard.pass.cpp libc++abi :: test_vector1.pass.cpp libc++abi :: test_vector2.pass.cpp libc++abi :: uncaught_exceptions.pass.cpp libc++abi :: unwind_01.pass.cpp libc++abi :: unwind_02.pass.cpp libc++abi :: unwind_03.pass.cpp libc++abi :: unwind_04.pass.cpp libc++abi :: unwind_05.pass.cpp libc++abi :: unwind_06.pass.cpp -- -Brian -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151122/ef01ef62/attachment.html>