Craig Rodrigues via llvm-dev
2015-Oct-09 22:33 UTC
[llvm-dev] Python version for scripts in LLVM?
Hi,
Is there a rule or guideline about what Python versions
must be supported for scripts in the LLVM tree?
I am working on some patches to some scripts in LLVM
to use features in Python 2.7, so that these scripts
can run under Python 2.7 and Python 3.x
Is that OK?
For example, here is a patch to use print as a function,
so that the scripts can work in Python 2.7 and Python 3.x
--
Craig
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151009/dbb54b3a/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
Index: DSAclean.py
==================================================================---
DSAclean.py (revision 249819)
+++ DSAclean.py (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
#! /usr/bin/python
+from __future__ import print_function
+
#changelog:
#10/13/2005b: replaced the # in tmp(.#*)* with alphanumeric and _, this will
then remove
#nodes such as %tmp.1.i and %tmp._i.3
@@ -11,7 +13,7 @@
import re
import sys
if( len(sys.argv) < 3 ):
- print 'usage is: ./DSAclean <dot_file_to_be_cleaned>
<out_put_file>'
+ print('usage is: ./DSAclean <dot_file_to_be_cleaned>
<out_put_file>')
sys.exit(1)
#get a file object
input = open(sys.argv[1], 'r')
Index: DSAextract.py
==================================================================---
DSAextract.py (revision 249819)
+++ DSAextract.py (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
#! /usr/bin/python
+from __future__ import print_function
+
#this is a script to extract given named nodes from a dot file, with
#the associated edges. An edge is kept iff for edge x -> y
# x and y are both nodes specified to be kept.
@@ -31,8 +33,8 @@
if len(sys.argv) < 3:
- print 'usage is ./DSAextract <dot_file_to_modify> \
- <output_file> [list of nodes to extract]'
+ print('usage is ./DSAextract <dot_file_to_modify> \
+ <output_file> [list of nodes to extract]')
#open the input file
input = open(sys.argv[1], 'r')
@@ -71,11 +73,11 @@
#test code
-#print '\n'
+#print('\n')
-print node_name_set
+print(node_name_set)
-#print node_set
+#print(node_set)
#open the output file
Index: bisect
==================================================================--- bisect
(revision 249819)
+++ bisect (working copy)
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
#!/usr/bin/env python
+from __future__ import print_function
import os
import sys
import argparse
@@ -25,7 +26,7 @@
count = start + (end - start)/2
print("Visiting Count: %d with (Start, End) = (%d,%d)" % (count,
start, end))
cmd = [x % {'count':count} for x in args.command]
- print cmd
+ print(cmd)
result = subprocess.call(cmd)
if result == 0:
print(" PASSES! Setting start to count")
Index: create_ladder_graph.py
==================================================================---
create_ladder_graph.py (revision 249819)
+++ create_ladder_graph.py (working copy)
@@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
really behaving linearly.
"""
+from __future__ import print_function
import argparse
def main():
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description=__doc__)
@@ -17,27 +18,27 @@
help="Number of ladder rungs. Must be a multiple of
2")
args = parser.parse_args()
if (args.rungs % 2) != 0:
- print "Rungs must be a multiple of 2"
+ print("Rungs must be a multiple of 2")
return
- print "int ladder(int *foo, int *bar, int x) {"
+ print("int ladder(int *foo, int *bar, int x) {")
rung1 = xrange(0, args.rungs, 2)
rung2 = xrange(1, args.rungs, 2)
for i in rung1:
- print "rung1%d:" % i
- print "*foo = x++;"
+ print("rung1%d:" % i)
+ print("*foo = x++;")
if i != rung1[-1]:
- print "if (*bar) goto rung1%d;" % (i+2)
- print "else goto rung2%d;" % (i+1)
+ print("if (*bar) goto rung1%d;" % (i+2))
+ print("else goto rung2%d;" % (i+1))
else:
- print "goto rung2%d;" % (i+1)
+ print("goto rung2%d;" % (i+1))
for i in rung2:
- print "rung2%d:" % i
- print "*foo = x++;"
+ print("rung2%d:" % i)
+ print("*foo = x++;")
if i != rung2[-1]:
- print "goto rung2%d;" % (i+2)
+ print("goto rung2%d;" % (i+2))
else:
- print "return *foo;"
- print "}"
+ print("return *foo;")
+ print("}")
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Index: lint/common_lint.py
==================================================================---
lint/common_lint.py (revision 249819)
+++ lint/common_lint.py (working copy)
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
#
# Common lint functions applicable to multiple types of files.
+from __future__ import print_function
import re
def VerifyLineLength(filename, lines, max_length):
@@ -89,7 +90,7 @@
for filename in filenames:
file = open(filename, 'r')
if not file:
- print 'Cound not open %s' % filename
+ print('Cound not open %s' % filename)
continue
lines = file.readlines()
lint.extend(linter.RunOnFile(filename, lines))
Index: lint/cpp_lint.py
==================================================================---
lint/cpp_lint.py (revision 249819)
+++ lint/cpp_lint.py (working copy)
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
# TODO: add unittests for the verifier functions:
# http://docs.python.org/library/unittest.html .
+from __future__ import print_function
import common_lint
import re
import sys
@@ -86,7 +87,7 @@
def CppLintMain(filenames):
all_lint = common_lint.RunLintOverAllFiles(CppLint(), filenames)
for lint in all_lint:
- print '%s:%d:%s' % (lint[0], lint[1], lint[2])
+ print('%s:%d:%s' % (lint[0], lint[1], lint[2]))
return 0
Index: shuffle_fuzz.py
==================================================================---
shuffle_fuzz.py (revision 249819)
+++ shuffle_fuzz.py (working copy)
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
a bug.
"""
+from __future__ import print_function
import argparse
import itertools
import random
@@ -109,13 +110,13 @@
if args.verbose:
# Print out the shuffle sequence in a compact form.
- print >>sys.stderr, ('Testing shuffle sequence "%s"
(v%d%s):' %
- (args.seed, width, element_type))
+ print ('Testing shuffle sequence "%s" (v%d%s):' %
+ (args.seed, width, element_type), file=sys.stderr)
for i, shuffles in enumerate(shuffle_tree):
- print >>sys.stderr, ' tree level %d:' % (i,)
+ print(' tree level %d:' % (i,), file=sys.stderr)
for j, s in enumerate(shuffles):
- print >>sys.stderr, ' shuffle %d: %s' % (j, s)
- print >>sys.stderr, ''
+ print(' shuffle %d: %s' % (j, s), file=sys.stderr)
+ print('', file=sys.stderr)
# Symbolically evaluate the shuffle tree.
inputs = [[int(j % element_modulus)
@@ -128,7 +129,7 @@
for j in s]
for i, s in enumerate(shuffles)]
if len(results) != 1:
- print >>sys.stderr, 'ERROR: Bad results: %s' % (results,)
+ print('ERROR: Bad results: %s' % (results,), file=sys.stderr)
sys.exit(1)
result = results[0]
Index: update_llc_test_checks.py
==================================================================---
update_llc_test_checks.py (revision 249819)
+++ update_llc_test_checks.py (working copy)
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
FileCheck patterns. It can either update all of the tests in the file or
a single test function.
"""
-
+from __future__ import print_function
import argparse
import itertools
import string
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
for test in args.tests:
if args.verbose:
- print >>sys.stderr, 'Scanning for RUN lines in test file:
%s' % (test,)
+ print('Scanning for RUN lines in test file: %s' % (test,),
file=sys.stderr)
with open(test) as f:
test_lines = [l.rstrip() for l in f]
@@ -83,19 +83,19 @@
run_lines = [m.group(1)
for m in [run_line_re.match(l) for l in test_lines] if m]
if args.verbose:
- print >>sys.stderr, 'Found %d RUN lines:' %
(len(run_lines),)
+ print('Found %d RUN lines:' % (len(run_lines),), file=sys.stderr)
for l in run_lines:
- print >>sys.stderr, ' RUN: ' + l
+ print(' RUN: ' + l, file=sys.stderr)
checks = []
for l in run_lines:
(llc_cmd, filecheck_cmd) = tuple([cmd.strip() for cmd in
l.split('|', 1)])
if not llc_cmd.startswith('llc '):
- print >>sys.stderr, 'WARNING: Skipping non-llc RUN line:
' + l
+ print('WARNING: Skipping non-llc RUN line: ' + l,
file=sys.stderr)
continue
if not filecheck_cmd.startswith('FileCheck '):
- print >>sys.stderr, 'WARNING: Skipping non-FileChecked RUN
line: ' + l
+ print('WARNING: Skipping non-FileChecked RUN line: ' + l,
file=sys.stderr)
continue
llc_cmd_args = llc_cmd[len('llc'):].strip()
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@
asm.update({prefix: dict()})
for prefixes, llc_args in checks:
if args.verbose:
- print >>sys.stderr, 'Extracted LLC cmd: llc ' + llc_args
- print >>sys.stderr, 'Extracted FileCheck prefixes: ' +
str(prefixes)
+ print('Extracted LLC cmd: llc ' + llc_args, file=sys.stderr)
+ print('Extracted FileCheck prefixes: ' + str(prefixes),
file=sys.stderr)
raw_asm = llc(args, llc_args, test)
# Build up a dictionary of all the function bodies.
for m in asm_function_re.finditer(raw_asm):
@@ -129,14 +129,14 @@
# We only use the last line of the asm for stress tests.
f_asm = '\n'.join(f_asm.splitlines()[-1:])
if args.verbose:
- print >>sys.stderr, 'Processing asm for function: ' + f
+ print('Processing asm for function: ' + f, file=sys.stderr)
for l in f_asm.splitlines():
- print >>sys.stderr, ' ' + l
+ print(' ' + l, file=sys.stderr)
for prefix in prefixes:
if f in asm[prefix] and asm[prefix][f] != f_asm:
if prefix == prefixes[-1]:
- print >>sys.stderr, ('WARNING: Found conflicting asm
under the '
- 'same prefix!')
+ print('WARNING: Found conflicting asm under the '
+ 'same prefix!', file=sys.stderr)
else:
asm[prefix][f] = None
continue
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
is_in_function_start = False
prefix_set = set([prefix for prefixes, _ in checks for prefix in prefixes])
if args.verbose:
- print >>sys.stderr, 'Rewriting FileCheck prefixes: %s' %
(prefix_set,)
+ print('Rewriting FileCheck prefixes: %s' % (prefix_set,),
file=sys.stderr)
fixed_lines = []
for l in test_lines:
if is_in_function_start:
Index: wciia.py
==================================================================--- wciia.py
(revision 249819)
+++ wciia.py (working copy)
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
"""
+from __future__ import print_function
import os
code_owners = {}
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@
if 'filesfolders' in owner:
filesfolders = owner['filesfolders']
else:
-# print "F: field missing, using D: field"
+# print("F: field missing, using D: field")
owner['filesfolders'] = owner['description']
process_files_and_folders(owner)
code_owners[owner['name']] = owner
@@ -77,7 +78,7 @@
owner = code_owners[name]
if 'paths' in owner:
for path in owner['paths']:
-# print "searching (" + path + ")"
+# print("searching (" + path + ")")
# try exact match
if fpath == path:
return name
@@ -97,7 +98,7 @@
import sys
if len(sys.argv) < 2:
- print "usage " + sys.argv[0] + " file_or_folder"
+ print("usage " + sys.argv[0] + " file_or_folder")
exit(-1)
# the path we are checking
@@ -105,13 +106,13 @@
# check if this is real path
if not os.path.exists(path):
- print "path (" + path + ") does not exist"
+ print("path (" + path + ") does not exist")
exit(-1)
owners_name = find_owners(path)
# be grammatically correct
-print "The owner(s) of the (" + path + ") is(are) : " +
str(owners_name)
+print("The owner(s) of the (" + path + ") is(are) : " +
str(owners_name))
exit(0)
@@ -119,7 +120,7 @@
# not yet used
root = "."
for dir,subdirList,fileList in os.walk( root , topdown=False ) :
- print "dir :" , dir
+ print("dir :" , dir)
for fname in fileList :
- print "-" , fname
- print
+ print("-" , fname)
+ print()
Vasileios Kalintiris via llvm-dev
2015-Oct-09 22:44 UTC
[llvm-dev] Python version for scripts in LLVM?
Both cmake & configure test for Python >= 2.7. Given the amount of python code in the various scripts inside the LLVM projects, I wouldn't expect Python 3.x to work for everything without changes. - Vasileios ________________________________ From: llvm-dev [llvm-dev-bounces at lists.llvm.org] on behalf of Craig Rodrigues via llvm-dev [llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org] Sent: 09 October 2015 23:33 To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org Subject: [llvm-dev] Python version for scripts in LLVM? Hi, Is there a rule or guideline about what Python versions must be supported for scripts in the LLVM tree? I am working on some patches to some scripts in LLVM to use features in Python 2.7, so that these scripts can run under Python 2.7 and Python 3.x Is that OK? For example, here is a patch to use print as a function, so that the scripts can work in Python 2.7 and Python 3.x -- Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151009/aac6c2db/attachment.html>
Craig Rodrigues via llvm-dev
2015-Oct-10 00:12 UTC
[llvm-dev] Python version for scripts in LLVM?
On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Vasileios Kalintiris < Vasileios.Kalintiris at imgtec.com> wrote:> Both cmake & configure test for Python >= 2.7. Given the amount of python > code in the various scripts inside the LLVM projects, I wouldn't expect > Python 3.x to work for everything without changes. > >I just saw that Python 2.7 is listed as a dependency: http://lldb.llvm.org/build.html So that is reasonable. -- Craig -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20151009/9edbb99a/attachment.html>
Renato Golin via llvm-dev
2015-Oct-10 11:20 UTC
[llvm-dev] Python version for scripts in LLVM?
On 9 October 2015 at 23:44, Vasileios Kalintiris via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:> Both cmake & configure test for Python >= 2.7. Given the amount of python > code in the various scripts inside the LLVM projects, I wouldn't expect > Python 3.x to work for everything without changes.I use Arch, which defaults to Python 3, and I got no warnings from CMake, only errors in lit.py. But that was about 6 months ago, when I changed my default cmake line to force the python version. --renato
Seemingly Similar Threads
- What is the correct way to cross-compile LLVM and run the (in-tree) tests on a target board?
- [LLVMdev] Handling of KILL instructions.
- [libunwind][Mips] Problem using gas to assemble UnwindRegistersSave.S
- [RFC] Strategies for Bootstrapping Compiler-RT builtins
- Python version for scripts in LLVM?