Hi, I'm finally going to do the R600->AMDGPU rename this Friday. This is something I originally proposed last July [1], but had to put off in order to avoid creating really bad merge headaches for some users. The only change from my original proposal is that I'll just keep the existing r600 and amdgcn triples rather than adding a new one for amdgpu. If anyone has any strong objections to me doing this on Friday, please let me know. Thanks, Tom [1] htttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-July/075151.html
Hi Tom, I imagine you're going to wait until 3.6.2 final is out, to make it easier for emergency backports. Otherwise, looks good to me. cheers, --renato On 8 June 2015 at 22:41, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote:> Hi, > > I'm finally going to do the R600->AMDGPU rename this Friday. This is something > I originally proposed last July [1], but had to put off in order to avoid > creating really bad merge headaches for some users. The only change from > my original proposal is that I'll just keep the existing r600 and amdgcn > triples rather than adding a new one for amdgpu. If anyone has any > strong objections to me doing this on Friday, please let me know. > > Thanks, > Tom > > [1] htttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-July/075151.html > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 12:13:16AM +0200, Renato Golin wrote:> Hi Tom, > > I imagine you're going to wait until 3.6.2 final is out, to make it > easier for emergency backports. >Not quite, I'm going to do it just before the deadline to propose new patches for 3.6.2. It's unlikely I will need to backport anything after that, and if I do, it may be a pain, but it won't be impossible. -Tom> Otherwise, looks good to me. > > cheers, > --renato > > On 8 June 2015 at 22:41, Tom Stellard <tom at stellard.net> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm finally going to do the R600->AMDGPU rename this Friday. This is something > > I originally proposed last July [1], but had to put off in order to avoid > > creating really bad merge headaches for some users. The only change from > > my original proposal is that I'll just keep the existing r600 and amdgcn > > triples rather than adding a new one for amdgpu. If anyone has any > > strong objections to me doing this on Friday, please let me know. > > > > Thanks, > > Tom > > > > [1] htttp://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmdev/2014-July/075151.html > > > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [AMDGPU] non-hsa intrinsic with hsa target
- [LLVMdev] PROPOSAL: Rename Target R600 -> AMDGPU
- [AMDGPU] non-hsa intrinsic with hsa target
- [OpenCL][AMDGPU] Using AMDGPU generated kernel code for OpenCL
- [LLVMdev] [llvm-commits] RFC: Merge branches/R600 into TOT for 3.2 release