Marc Haber
2005-Jun-18 14:24 UTC
Bug#110429: Re: Bug#110429 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#110429: gnome-bin.postinst checks for group by reading /etc/group)
tags #110429 moreinfo thanks On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:59:56AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:> There is a patch in the BTS that won''t make adduser fail if a system > group is to be created and this group already exists as a system group.This patch has since then been applied. Can this bug be closed? If no answer is received, I plan to close this bug by the end of July 2005. Greetings Marc -- Marc.Haber@syscovery.com syscovery network services GmbH Dipl.-Inform. Weinheimer Straße 68 Geschäftsführer D-68309 Mannheim Tel: +49 [0] 621 71768 57 http://www.syscovery.com/
Debian Bug Tracking System
2005-Jun-18 14:48 UTC
[Adduser-devel] Processed: Re: Re: Bug#110429 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#110429: gnome-bin.postinst checks for group by reading /etc/group)
Processing commands for control@bugs.debian.org:> tags #110429 moreinfoBug#110429: addgroup does an exit(1) and break install scripts There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo> thanksStopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Thorild Selen), 110429@bugs.debian.org (Thorild Selen
2005-Jun-29 22:11 UTC
[Adduser-devel] Bug#110429: Re: Bug#110429 acknowledged by developer (Re: Bug#110429: gnome-bin.postinst checks for group by reading /etc/group)
Marc Haber writes: > tags #110429 moreinfo > thanks >=20 > On Wed, Mar 24, 2004 at 08:59:56AM +0100, Marc Haber wrote: > > There is a patch in the BTS that won''t make adduser fail if a system > > group is to be created and this group already exists as a system group. >=20 > This patch has since then been applied. Can this bug be closed=3F Sorry for the late reply, This all seems reasonable. (It would be great if there was a better way to distinguish system groups from user groups than looking at the numeric GID, since in an old heterogenous environment there may well be system groups allocated at rather arbitrary GIDs. However, I can''t come up with a good and portable solution to that, and there probably isn''t any...) > If no answer is received, I plan to close this bug by the end of July > 2005. Go ahead and close it, it looks fixed enough to me. Thorild Sel=E9n Datorf=F6reningen Update / Update Computer Club, Uppsala, SE