llvm dev - Aug 2014 - [LLVMdev] Building LLVM as a shared library on MinGw (Makefiles)

The shared library works fine here. I only made one modification to the
'tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile', because otherwise, two shared libraries
would
be created.

I've commented out the line 'SHARED_ALIAS := 1' from the Makefile.

Here is the command line i used to build LLVM/Clang:
../../configure --build=i686-w64-mingw32 --disable-assertions
--enable-keep-symbols --enable-optimized --enable-shared
--enable-targets=x86,x86_64

I used Mingw-w64 4.9.1 i686 posix + Clang r213454.

Sorry for my English.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140801/7e0e1f74/attachment.html>

Hmm, that's intersting. I guess the difference might be that you're
targetting 32bit and I'm targetting 64bit. Does it still work if you
replace
"s/^.* T _\([^.][^.]*\)$$/\1/p"
by
"s/^.* T \([^.][^.]*\)$$/\1/p"
in
tools/llvm-shlib (and similarly on the next line). If so I'll submit
this as a patch, if not I'll see how we can distinguish the two cases.

On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Ivan Garramona
<heavenandhell171 at gmail.com> wrote:
> The shared library works fine here. I only made one modification to the
> 'tools/llvm-shlib/Makefile', because otherwise, two shared
libraries would
> be created.
>
> I've commented out the line 'SHARED_ALIAS := 1' from the
Makefile.
>
> Here is the command line i used to build LLVM/Clang:
> ../../configure --build=i686-w64-mingw32 --disable-assertions
> --enable-keep-symbols --enable-optimized --enable-shared
> --enable-targets=x86,x86_64
>
> I used Mingw-w64 4.9.1 i686 posix + Clang r213454.
>
> Sorry for my English.

2014-08-01 16:51 GMT-03:00 Keno Fischer <kfischer at college.harvard.edu>:
> Hmm, that's intersting. I guess the difference might be that you're
> targetting 32bit and I'm targetting 64bit. Does it still work if you
> replace
> "s/^.* T _\([^.][^.]*\)$$/\1/p"
> by
> "s/^.* T \([^.][^.]*\)$$/\1/p"
> in
> tools/llvm-shlib (and similarly on the next line). If so I'll submit
> this as a patch, if not I'll see how we can distinguish the two cases.
>
It does work.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140801/a4f8459e/attachment.html>