I'm compiling compiler-rt via CMake+Ninja on x86_64+ArchLinux and one of the tests fails on ToT: MemorySanitizer :: chained_origin_with_signals.cc The text expects uninitialized warnings while the execution prints nothing, thus FileCheck fails. Anyone seeing this? cheers, --renato
+eugenis@ On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> I'm compiling compiler-rt via CMake+Ninja on x86_64+ArchLinux and one > of the tests fails on ToT: > > MemorySanitizer :: chained_origin_with_signals.cc > > The text expects uninitialized warnings while the execution prints > nothing, thus FileCheck fails. > > Anyone seeing this? > > cheers, > --renato >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140725/2f512989/attachment.html>
Hi, is it still an issue? Just by looking at the code, I don't see why it could fail. Do you need any help debugging it? On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote:> I'm compiling compiler-rt via CMake+Ninja on x86_64+ArchLinux and one > of the tests fails on ToT: > > MemorySanitizer :: chained_origin_with_signals.cc > > The text expects uninitialized warnings while the execution prints > nothing, thus FileCheck fails. > > Anyone seeing this? > > cheers, > --renato > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Hi Evgeniy, Yes, it is. The problem here is that the program doesn't fail on my box (release and debug builds), so I have no idea how to debug the problem. According to the test, it's ran as "not chained_origin_with_signals.cc.tmp", expecting it to fail. Also, the FileCheck expects to find warnings on the output, for which there is none Maybe I'm missing some CMake flag or library, and that's why the signal functionality is not working on my box? cheers, --renato On 25 July 2014 09:39, Evgeniy Stepanov <eugeni.stepanov at gmail.com> wrote:> Hi, > > is it still an issue? > Just by looking at the code, I don't see why it could fail. Do you > need any help debugging it? > > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:15 AM, Renato Golin <renato.golin at linaro.org> wrote: >> I'm compiling compiler-rt via CMake+Ninja on x86_64+ArchLinux and one >> of the tests fails on ToT: >> >> MemorySanitizer :: chained_origin_with_signals.cc >> >> The text expects uninitialized warnings while the execution prints >> nothing, thus FileCheck fails. >> >> Anyone seeing this? >> >> cheers, >> --renato >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] Sanitizer test failure
- [LLVMdev] Sanitizer test failure
- [LLVMdev] Curiosity about transform changes under Sanitizers (Was: [PATCH] Disable branch folding with MemorySanitizer)
- [LLVMdev] Curiosity about transform changes under Sanitizers (Was: [PATCH] Disable branch folding with MemorySanitizer)
- [LLVMdev] Curiosity about transform changes under Sanitizers (Was: [PATCH] Disable branch folding with MemorySanitizer)