Hi,
I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source:
class xxx explicit
{
};
int main (int argc, char **argv)
{
return 0;
}
and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain this error:
nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id
{
^
1 error generated.
But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes.
It’s a bug?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140408/2c4b7d6c/attachment.html>
Le 8 avr. 2014 à 12:55, Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni at gmail.com> a écrit :> Hi, > > I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source: > > class xxx explicit > { > }; > > int main (int argc, char **argv) > { > > return 0; > } > > and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain this error: > > nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id > { > ^ > 1 error generated. > > But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes.What standard version are you talking about ? I don't see anything like that in the C++11 final standard, nor in the current C++14 draft.> It’s a bug? > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140408/06de5eff/attachment.html>
C++ 11 last draft:
class-specifier:
class-head { member-specificationopt }
class-head:
class-key attribute-specifier-seqopt class-head-name class-virt-specifier-seqopt
base-clauseopt class-key attribute-specifier-seqopt base-clauseopt
class-head-name:
nested-name-specifieropt class-name
class-virt-specifier-seq: class-virt-specifier
class-virt-specifier-seq class-virt-specifier
class-virt-specifier:
final
explicit
Alessio.
Il giorno 08/apr/2014, alle ore 13:17, Jean-Daniel Dupas <mailing at
xenonium.com> ha scritto:
>
> Le 8 avr. 2014 à 12:55, Alessio Giovanni Baroni <alessiogiovanni.baroni
at gmail.com> a écrit :
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I’m on Mac OS X 10.9.2 with all last updates; if I have this source:
>>
>> class xxx explicit
>> {
>> };
>>
>> int main (int argc, char **argv)
>> {
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> and I compile it with clang++ -std=c++11 -Wall -pedantic -c I obtain
this error:
>>
>> nn:1: error: expected unqualified-id
>> {
>> ^
>> 1 error generated.
>>
>> But the C++ 11 standard permits explicit on classes.
>
> What standard version are you talking about ?
>
> I don't see anything like that in the C++11 final standard, nor in the
current C++14 draft.
>
>
>> It’s a bug?
>> _______________________________________________
>> LLVM Developers mailing list
>> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
>> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140408/8e3395eb/attachment.html>