Alexey Samsonov
2014-Feb-11 09:59 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
Hi all, compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files as follows during this week: 1. libraries: a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. 2. tests: all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree current state and suggestion to change its structure: http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html Please speak up if you disagree with this. -- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140211/07c96b42/attachment.html>
Renato Golin
2014-Feb-11 10:12 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
Hi Alexey, "rt" could be an alternative to "core", but really, either are equally bad. :) LGTM either way. cheers, --renato On 11 February 2014 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, > there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files > as follows during this week: > > 1. libraries: > a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the name > sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: > "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. > b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" > c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. > > 2. tests: > all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under "/lib" > to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. > > See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree > current state and suggestion to change its structure: > http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html > > Please speak up if you disagree with this. > > -- > Alexey Samsonov, MSK
Dimitry Andric
2014-Feb-11 13:31 UTC
[LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
On 11 Feb 2014, at 10:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:> compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files as follows during this week: > > 1. libraries: > a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc.Maybe just lib/runtime (assuming that "rt" was shorthand for it)? :-) -Dimitry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 203 bytes Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140211/54a465e4/attachment.sig>
Vadim Chugunov
2014-Feb-12 06:27 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
According to the makefile, the module is called "builtins", perhaps the directory should be called the same? On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote:> Hi all, > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, > there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files > as follows during this week: > > 1. libraries: > a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the name > sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: > "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. > b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" > c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. > > 2. tests: > all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under > "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. > > See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree > current state and suggestion to change its structure: > > http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html > > Please speak up if you disagree with this. > > -- > Alexey Samsonov, MSK > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140211/5feb79fd/attachment.html>
Alexey Samsonov
2014-Feb-12 12:35 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
Yes, I think "builtins" makes more sense than "runtime" or "core". Thanks for suggestion! On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 10:27 AM, Vadim Chugunov <vadimcn at gmail.com> wrote:> According to the makefile, the module is called "builtins", perhaps the > directory should be called the same? > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:59 AM, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com>wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, >> there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files >> as follows during this week: >> >> 1. libraries: >> a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the >> name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: >> "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. >> b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" >> c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. >> >> 2. tests: >> all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under >> "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. >> >> See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree >> current state and suggestion to change its structure: >> >> http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html >> >> Please speak up if you disagree with this. >> >> -- >> Alexey Samsonov, MSK >> >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev >> >> >-- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140212/f57cf08d/attachment.html>
David Chisnall
2014-Feb-12 12:56 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the reorganisation? David On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files as follows during this week: > > 1. libraries: > a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. > b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" > c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. > > 2. tests: > all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. > > See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree current state and suggestion to change its structure: > http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html > > Please speak up if you disagree with this. > > -- > Alexey Samsonov, MSK > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Iain Sandoe
2014-Feb-12 13:11 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
I would still urge folks to consider keeping distinct functionality in separate places. Agreed, it makes more sense for the [language agnostic] unwinder to be in compiler-rt than libcxxabi -- but IMO it makes even more sense for it to be distinct. The bundling of the unwinder with libgcc_s gave us (i.e. 3rd party folks, outside the vendor's organisation) nothing but headaches. Much happier to see it in libunwind.xxx Iain On 12 Feb 2014, at 12:56, David Chisnall wrote:> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the reorganisation? > > David > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different platforms, there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move the files as follows during this week: >> >> 1. libraries: >> a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. >> b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" >> c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. >> >> 2. tests: >> all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. >> >> See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree current state and suggestion to change its structure: >> http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html >> >> Please speak up if you disagree with this. >> >> -- >> Alexey Samsonov, MSK >> _______________________________________________ >> LLVM Developers mailing list >> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
Alexey Samsonov
2014-Feb-12 13:21 UTC
[LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 4:56 PM, David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote:> Are you going to move the unwind library there as part of the > reorganisation? >No.> > David > > On 11 Feb 2014, at 09:59, Alexey Samsonov <samsonov at google.com> wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > compiler-rt is now not only a libgcc replacement for different > platforms, there are sanitizer and profile runtimes as well. I plan to move > the files as follows during this week: > > > > 1. libraries: > > a) all libgcc replacement stuff moves from "/lib" to "/lib/core" (the > name sucks, please suggest alternatives). Same for platform-specific code: > "/lib/arm/"->"/lib/core/arm", "/lib/i386"->"/lib/core/i386" etc. > > b) "/BlocksRuntime"->"/lib/BlocksRuntime" > > c) "/lib/sanitizer_common", "/lib/xsan", "/lib/profile" are not moved. > > > > 2. tests: > > all tests (lit tests and unit tests) are moved from directories under > "/lib" to "/test" to be consistent with LLVM/Clang test subtrees. > > > > See the original mail from Chandler for the overview of compiler-rt tree > current state and suggestion to change its structure: > > > http://clang-developers.42468.n3.nabble.com/Sanitizers-libs-in-Compiler-RT-tp4037520p4037567.html > > > > Please speak up if you disagree with this. > > > > -- > > Alexey Samsonov, MSK > > _______________________________________________ > > LLVM Developers mailing list > > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >-- Alexey Samsonov, MSK -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140212/0eb4d4cf/attachment.html>
Apparently Analagous Threads
- [LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
- [LLVMdev] [cfe-dev] Sanitizers libs in Compiler-RT
- [LLVMdev] Error building compiler-rt
- [LLVMdev] Heads-up: changing the structure of compiler-rt source tree
- [LLVMdev] compiler-rt tests in cmake?