llvm dev - Jan 2012 - [LLVMdev] Non-Chain Chains

Following up on my call schedule posting from yesterday, I am now trying
to add edges from the call to the instruction before it.

This seemed easiest to do in SelectionDAGBuilder but it is troublesome.

A couple of questions:

  - How do I get the previous instruction that was translated?
    prior(CS.getInstruction()) in visitCall returns something invalid.
    When I try to call getValue on the returned Instruction it blows up.
    I really need the SDValue produced as a result of translating that
    last instruction.  Is there some other way to get it?

  - Can a TokenFactor node take a non-chain input?  Consider:

    r1 = load ...
    r2 = add
    r3 = call

    The call will naturally take the chain input from the load but I
    also want to add a dependence from the add to the call.  I was going
    to do something like this:

    Chain = TokenFactor(load chain, r2)
    LowerCallTo(Chain, ...)

    Is that legal?  If not, is there any way to express this dependence?
    I could use flag/glue nodes in SUnits but it somehow seems uglier.
    For one thing, we don't have the original instruction order once
    we've created SDNodes so I can't imagine how I'd find the right
    SUnit to glue to the call.

Thanks!

                       -Dave

greened at obbligato.org (David A. Greene) writes:
>   - How do I get the previous instruction that was translated?
>     prior(CS.getInstruction()) in visitCall returns something invalid.
>     When I try to call getValue on the returned Instruction it blows up.
>     I really need the SDValue produced as a result of translating that
>     last instruction.  Is there some other way to get it?
I figured out I did this part wrong.  I can now get to the previous
instruction.
>   - Can a TokenFactor node take a non-chain input?  Consider:
>
>     r1 = load ...
>     r2 = add
>     r3 = call
>
>     The call will naturally take the chain input from the load but I
>     also want to add a dependence from the add to the call.  I was going
>     to do something like this:
>
>     Chain = TokenFactor(load chain, r2)
>     LowerCallTo(Chain, ...)
This, however is still a problem.
>     Is that legal?  If not, is there any way to express this dependence?
>     I could use flag/glue nodes in SUnits but it somehow seems uglier.
>     For one thing, we don't have the original instruction order once
>     we've created SDNodes so I can't imagine how I'd find the
right
>     SUnit to glue to the call.
I still need help with this question.

                               -Dave