http://llvm.org/PR5184 describes two problems with thread-safety in the lazy JIT compiler, the first of which is quite hard to fix if we can fix it at all. Could the people who currently use the lazy compiler speak up either here or on the bug and say what they think the path forward should be? I'm not volunteering to implement the whole thing, but I keep having to modify the JIT, and knowing the eventual goal would let me make incremental progress toward it. Thanks, Jeffrey
Reasonably Related Threads
- [LLVMdev] Should LLVM JIT default to lazy or non-lazy?
- [LLVMdev] Should LLVM JIT default to lazy or non-lazy?
- [LLVMdev] Should LLVM JIT default to lazy or non-lazy?
- [LLVMdev] Should LLVM JIT default to lazy or non-lazy?
- [LLVMdev] Should LLVM JIT default to lazy or non-lazy?