Hi all,
I'm interested in the LLVM Ocaml bindings so I pulled the current
sources from SVN and built them. When I ran the test suite I got the
following stats:
# of expected passes 2631
# of unexpected failures 7
# of expected failures 11
It looks like some of the failures were due to the Ocaml parts of the
tests:
FAIL: /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/analysis.ml
Failed with unknown error (or has stderr output) at line 1
while running: /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -cc g++ -I
/home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/Debug/lib/ocaml
-warn-error A llvm.cma llvm_analysis.cma
/home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/analysis.ml
-o analysis.ml.tmp
/tmp/camlprim265f17.c:911: warning: deprecated conversion from string
constant to 'char*'
and
FAIL: /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/bitreader.ml
Failed with unknown error (or has stderr output) at line 1
while running: /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -cc g++ -I
/home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/Debug/lib/ocaml
-warn-error A llvm.cma llvm_bitreader.cma llvm_bitwriter.cma
/home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/bitreader.ml -o
bitreader.ml.tmp
/tmp/camlprim69f718.c:917: warning: deprecated conversion from string
constant to 'char*'
and so on.
What is the status of these bindings? Are they supposed to be working?
My system is Ubuntu Linux (Hardy Heron release) on x86. The compilers
I'm using are:
gcc 4.2.3
g++ 4.2.3
ocaml 3.10.0
and were all installed from binary packages. I also tried gcc/g++
version 3.4.6, but that wouldn't even compile llvm.
Any clues?
Cheers,
Erik
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
-----------------------------------------------------------------
"Projects promoting programming in natural language are intrinsically
doomed to fail." -- Edsger Dijkstra
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 12:32, Erik de Castro Lopo <mle+cl at mega-nerd.com> wrote:> Hi all, > > I'm interested in the LLVM Ocaml bindings so I pulled the current > sources from SVN and built them. When I ran the test suite I got the > following stats: > > # of expected passes 2631 > # of unexpected failures 7 > # of expected failures 11 > > It looks like some of the failures were due to the Ocaml parts of the > tests: > > FAIL: /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/analysis.ml > Failed with unknown error (or has stderr output) at line 1 > while running: /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -cc g++ -I /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/Debug/lib/ocaml > -warn-error A llvm.cma llvm_analysis.cma /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/analysis.ml > -o analysis.ml.tmp > /tmp/camlprim265f17.c:911: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' > > and > > FAIL: /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/bitreader.ml > Failed with unknown error (or has stderr output) at line 1 > while running: /usr/bin/ocamlc.opt -cc g++ -I /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/Debug/lib/ocaml > -warn-error A llvm.cma llvm_bitreader.cma llvm_bitwriter.cma > /home/erikd/Hack/SVN/llvm/test/Bindings/Ocaml/bitreader.ml -o bitreader.ml.tmp > /tmp/camlprim69f718.c:917: warning: deprecated conversion from string constant to 'char*' > > and so on. > > What is the status of these bindings? Are they supposed to be working?They're working fine for me (I'm using ocamlopt rather than ocamlc though). The ocaml part of the testsuite works fine for me too but I have an older gcc (4.1.2), maybe that's why.> Any clues?This error is in some temporary C file output by ocamlc. The only way to fix that is probably to modify ocamlc. I suggest using gcc rather than g++ for this: replace '-cc $(CXX)' by '-cclib -lstdc++' in the site.exp target of test/Makefile -- Olivier
Olivier Andrieu wrote:> They're working fine for me (I'm using ocamlopt rather than ocamlc though).Is there a way to tell it to use ocamlopt instead of the byte code compiler?> I suggest using gcc rather than g++ for this: replace '-cc $(CXX)' by > '-cclib -lstdc++' in the site.exp target of test/MakefileThat fixed it for me. Thanks. Cheers, Erik -- ----------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo ----------------------------------------------------------------- "I'd crawl over an acre of 'Visual This++' and 'Integrated Development That' to get to gcc, Emacs, and gdb. Thank you." -- Vance Petree