Hi, While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does this mean that they are not to be used / don't work? Or is it just that the documentation is outdated? Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan. [1] http://www.llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote:> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found > that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does > this mean that they are not to be used / don't work? Or is it just > that the documentation is outdated?Which one specifically? It probably means they are missing documentation. -Chris -- http://nondot.org/sabre/ http://llvm.org/
On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Chris Lattner <sabre at nondot.org> wrote:> On Mon, 7 Jul 2008, Mahadevan R wrote: >> While going through the list of intrinsics in Intrinsics.td, I found >> that it does not match the list given in Language Reference [1]. Does >> this mean that they are not to be used / don't work? Or is it just >> that the documentation is outdated? > > Which one specifically? It probably means they are missing documentation.Intrinsics only in Intrinsics.td: llvm.atomic.las llvm.atomic.lcs llvm.atomic.lss llvm.flt.rounds llvm.longjmp llvm.setjmp llvm.siglongjmp llvm.sigsetjmp Intrinsics only in Language Reference: llvm.atomic.cmp.swap llvm.atomic.load.add llvm.atomic.load.sub llvm.atomic.load.nand Thanks & Regards, -Mahadevan.
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
- [LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
- [LLVMdev] Intrinsics and it's documentation.
- [LLVMdev] llvm-py (Python bindings for LLVM), new release 0.6.
- [LLVMdev] llvm-py (Python bindings for LLVM), new release 0.6.