llvm dev - Jun 2007 - [LLVMdev] fail to build LLVM 2.0 on Cygwin/WinXP

I am trying to build LLVM 2.0 (source downloaded from llvm.org) under 
WinXP/Cygwin, and got compilation errors.
I have tried to use:
GCC 3.4.4.
GCC 4.0.4
GCC 4.1.2
and
GCC 4.2.0, and the error remains.

I looked at the code, but not clear what the problem is.
Please let me know what I should do in this case.

Thank you

Chuck

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Error msg after typing gmake -k
...
...
llvm[1]: Compiling Function.cpp for Release build
/home/czhao/LLVM/llvm-2.0/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:273: error: 
'llvm::FunctionTyp
e* llvm::Intrinsic::getType(llvm::Intrinsic::ID, const llvm::Type**, 
uint32_t)'
should have been declared inside 'llvm::Intrinsic'
make[1]: *** [/home/czhao/LLVM/obj2.0/lib/VMCore/Release/Function.o] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/czhao/LLVM/obj2.0/lib/VMCore'
make: *** [all] Error 1
...

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Chuck Zhao wrote:
> I looked at the code, but not clear what the problem is.
> Please let me know what I should do in this case.
I believe this has been fixed on mainline CVS, try it. :)

-Chris
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Error msg after typing gmake -k
> ...
> ...
> llvm[1]: Compiling Function.cpp for Release build
> /home/czhao/LLVM/llvm-2.0/lib/VMCore/Function.cpp:273: error:
> 'llvm::FunctionTyp
> e* llvm::Intrinsic::getType(llvm::Intrinsic::ID, const llvm::Type**,
> uint32_t)'
> should have been declared inside 'llvm::Intrinsic'
> make[1]: *** [/home/czhao/LLVM/obj2.0/lib/VMCore/Release/Function.o] Error
1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/czhao/LLVM/obj2.0/lib/VMCore'
> make: *** [all] Error 1
> ...
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu         http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev
>
-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/

> On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Chuck Zhao wrote:
>> I looked at the code, but not clear what the problem is.
>> Please let me know what I should do in this case.
> 
> I believe this has been fixed on mainline CVS, try it. :)
Weird, I built it on 3.4.4 on testing for release ?

Aaron