llvm dev - Jun 2007 - [LLVMdev] mistake in documentation? [http://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html]

Hi,

For the section regarding Functions, the doc says:

"The first basic block in a program is special in two
ways: it is immediately executed on entrance to the
function, and it is not allowed to have predecessor
basic blocks"

Is this really supposed to say: "The first basic block
in a functionis special in two ways:" ?

Thanks,
Ivan


---------------------
Ivan Novick
http://www.0x4849.net

On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 ivan at 0x4849.net wrote:
> Is this really supposed to say: "The first basic block
> in a functionis special in two ways:" ?
Yep, fixed, thanks.

-Chris

-- 
http://nondot.org/sabre/
http://llvm.org/