I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. Thank you Seung Jae Lee
It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work. Seung Jae Lee wrote:> I just wonder that Visual Studio .NET 2003 is the most compatible one among various MS Visual Studio versions for LLVM. > > Thank you > Seung Jae Lee > _______________________________________________ > LLVM Developers mailing list > LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > > > >
On 3/10/07, Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote:> It is, if only because it's the version I use, but 2005 is supposed to > work also. That being said, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that it > doesn't due to recent STL issues. Versions prior to 2003 won't work.I'm using the basic stuff (just libraries, 1.9) with 2005, although we had to fix a few compilation errors locally. Can't remember of the top of my head what they where but IIRC there were some explicit namespace qualifications missing here and there. HTH, Andreas