bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2013-Jul-06 10:30 UTC
[Bug 832] New: iptables-save refuses to save "--packet 0"
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=832 Summary: iptables-save refuses to save "--packet 0" Product: iptables Version: 1.4.x Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Fedora Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: iptables-save AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: tristen_e at yahoo.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 consider the following example on fedora. if i apply the following rules, iptables accepts the commands and works as expected: $ iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 90 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 --packet 0 -j REDIRECT --to 9000 $ iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport 90 -m statistic --mode nth --every 1 --packet 0 -j REDIRECT --to 9001 then i output to screen using: $ iptables-save and i see the following, without "--packet 0": :POSTROUTING ACCEPT [38:3497] -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 90 -m statistic --mode nth --every 2 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9000 -A PREROUTING -p tcp -m tcp --dport 90 -m statistic --mode nth --every 1 -j REDIRECT --to-ports 9001 now i save to the the startup file: $ iptables-save > /etc/sysconfig/iptables and then restarting results in a serice failed error: $ systemctl restart iptables.service then examining why the iptables service failed to start, results in the following output: $ systemctl status iptables.service iptables: Applying firewall rules: iptables-restore v1.4.16.2: statistic: option "--every" also requires "--packet". which is exactly the same error i'd get if i omitted "--packet 0" from the original command entered manually. the workaround is to manually apply the script at startup. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
bugzilla-daemon at netfilter.org
2013-Jul-06 14:43 UTC
[Bug 832] iptables-save refuses to save "--packet 0"
https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=832 Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |netfilter at linuxace.com Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Phil Oester <netfilter at linuxace.com> 2013-07-06 16:43:48 CEST --- This has already been fixed by the commit shown below. Upgrade to the latest iptables version. commit a46a5698027aa48e27e3cc2d54bb8bbafb10e7da Author: Tom Eastep <teastep at shorewall.net> Date: Mon Nov 19 11:40:40 2012 +0100 extensions: libxt_statistic: Fix save output Suppressing '--packet 0' in save output resulted in restore failure. This patch includes '--packet 0' in save output while continuing to suppress it in print output. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.netfilter.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are watching all bug changes.
Maybe Matching Threads
- [Bug 823] New: IPv6 NAT memory leaking
- [Bug 877] New: nftables - Set - define core dumps
- [Bug 886] New: iptables-xml segfaults on "-APOSTROUTING"
- [Bug 857] New: ConnLimit unable to work properly
- [Bug 864] New: Verbose output options rejected when modifying chains