thr3ads.net - Linux Virtualization - [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout [Dec 2014]

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Cornelia Huck

2014-Dec-03 09:27 UTC

[PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> >  void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> >  {
> > +    /*
> > +     * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> > +     * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set up.
> 
> Where does it say that?
Hmpf, may have imagined that.

This means we either need to track whether used/avail have been
specified or calculated or move responsibility for re-calculation of
used/avail for the old layout into the callers.> 
> > +     */
> > +    if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1) &&
> > +        vdev->vq[n].vring.desc) {
> > +        error_report("tried to modify buffer num for virtio-1
device");
> > +        return;
> > +    }
> >      /* Don't allow guest to flip queue between existent and
> >       * nonexistent states, or to set it to an invalid size.
> >       */
>

Cornelia Huck

2014-Dec-03 09:50 UTC

head link

[PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:27:36 +0100
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > >  void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> > >  {
> > > +    /*
> > > +     * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only be
> > > +     * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set up.
> > 
> > Where does it say that?
> 
> Hmpf, may have imagined that.
> 
> This means we either need to track whether used/avail have been
> specified or calculated or move responsibility for re-calculation of
> used/avail for the old layout into the callers.
What about this one instead?

diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
index 43b7e02..1e2a720 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
@@ -244,9 +244,13 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr offset,
uint64_t value,
     case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM:
         DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value,
VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE);
         virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
+        /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */
+        virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
         break;
     case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN:
+        /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */
         virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
+        virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
         break;
     case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN:
         if (value == 0) {
diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
index 8f69ffa..b2d553e 100644
--- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
+++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ typedef struct VRing
 struct VirtQueue
 {
     VRing vring;
-    hwaddr pa;
     uint16_t last_avail_idx;
     /* Last used index value we have signalled on */
     uint16_t signalled_used;
@@ -92,15 +91,18 @@ struct VirtQueue
 };
 
 /* virt queue functions */
-static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq)
+void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
 {
-    hwaddr pa = vq->pa;
+    VRing *vring = &vdev->vq[n].vring;
 
-    vq->vring.desc = pa;
-    vq->vring.avail = pa + vq->vring.num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
-    vq->vring.used = vring_align(vq->vring.avail +
-                                 offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vq->vring.num]),
-                                 vq->vring.align);
+    if (!vring->desc) {
+        /* not yet setup -> nothing to do */
+        return;
+    }
+    vring->avail = vring->desc + vring->num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
+    vring->used = vring_align(vring->avail +
+                              offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vring->num]),
+                              vring->align);
 }
 
 static inline uint64_t vring_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, hwaddr desc_pa,
@@ -605,7 +607,6 @@ void virtio_reset(void *opaque)
         vdev->vq[i].vring.avail = 0;
         vdev->vq[i].vring.used = 0;
         vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx = 0;
-        vdev->vq[i].pa = 0;
         vdev->vq[i].vector = VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR;
         vdev->vq[i].signalled_used = 0;
         vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
@@ -708,13 +709,21 @@ void virtio_config_writel(VirtIODevice *vdev, uint32_t
addr, uint32_t data)
 
 void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr)
 {
-    vdev->vq[n].pa = addr;
-    virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
+    vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = addr;
+    virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n);
 }
 
 hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
 {
-    return vdev->vq[n].pa;
+    return vdev->vq[n].vring.desc;
+}
+
+void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
+                            hwaddr avail, hwaddr used)
+{
+    vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = desc;
+    vdev->vq[n].vring.avail = avail;
+    vdev->vq[n].vring.used = used;
 }
 
 void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
@@ -728,7 +737,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
num)
         return;
     }
     vdev->vq[n].vring.num = num;
-    virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
 }
 
 int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
@@ -748,6 +756,11 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
align)
     BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev));
     VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
 
+    /* virtio-1 compliant devices cannot change the aligment */
+    if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
+        error_report("tried to modify queue alignment for virtio-1
device");
+        return;
+    }
     /* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this
      * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than
      * silently failing to migrate this state)
@@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
align)
     assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment);
 
     vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align;
-    virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
 }
 
 void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq)
@@ -949,7 +961,8 @@ void virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f)
         if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
             qemu_put_be32(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.align);
         }
-        qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa);
+        /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
+        qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
         qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
         if (k->save_queue) {
             k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
@@ -1044,13 +1057,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
version_id)
         if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
             vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
         }
-        vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
+        vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f);
         qemu_get_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
         vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
         vdev->vq[i].notification = true;
 
-        if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
-            virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[i]);
+        if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
+            /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
+            virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, i);
         } else if (vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx) {
             error_report("VQ %d address 0x0 "
                          "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x",
@@ -1084,7 +1098,7 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
version_id)
     }
 
     for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
-        if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
+        if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
             uint16_t nheads;
             nheads = vring_avail_idx(&vdev->vq[i]) -
vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
             /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor numbers.
*/
diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
index 68c40db..b63ced3 100644
--- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
+++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
@@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr
addr);
 hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
 void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num);
 int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
+void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
+                            hwaddr avail, hwaddr used);
+void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
 void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align);
 void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
 uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);

Michael S. Tsirkin

2014-Dec-03 10:52 UTC

head link

[PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

On Wed, Dec 03, 2014 at 10:50:04AM +0100, Cornelia Huck
wrote:> On Wed, 3 Dec 2014 10:27:36 +0100
> Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck at de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 2 Dec 2014 21:03:45 +0200
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst at redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 04:41:36PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > >  void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int
num)
> > > >  {
> > > > +    /*
> > > > +     * For virtio-1 devices, the number of buffers may only
be
> > > > +     * updated if the ring addresses have not yet been set
up.
> > > 
> > > Where does it say that?
> > 
> > Hmpf, may have imagined that.
> > 
> > This means we either need to track whether used/avail have been
> > specified or calculated or move responsibility for re-calculation of
> > used/avail for the old layout into the callers.
> 
> What about this one instead?
Looks ok overall - some questions below.
> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> index 43b7e02..1e2a720 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio-mmio.c
> @@ -244,9 +244,13 @@ static void virtio_mmio_write(void *opaque, hwaddr
offset, uint64_t value,
>      case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUENUM:
>          DPRINTF("mmio_queue write %d max %d\n", (int)value,
VIRTQUEUE_MAX_SIZE);
>          virtio_queue_set_num(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
> +        /* Note: only call this function for legacy devices */
> +        virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
>          break;
>      case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEALIGN:
> +        /* Note: this is only valid for legacy devices */
>          virtio_queue_set_align(vdev, vdev->queue_sel, value);
> +        virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, vdev->queue_sel);
>          break;
>      case VIRTIO_MMIO_QUEUEPFN:
>          if (value == 0) {
Let's just call virtio_queue_update_rings from virtio_queue_set_align?


> diff --git a/hw/virtio/virtio.c b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> index 8f69ffa..b2d553e 100644
> --- a/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> +++ b/hw/virtio/virtio.c
> @@ -69,7 +69,6 @@ typedef struct VRing
>  struct VirtQueue
>  {
>      VRing vring;
> -    hwaddr pa;
>      uint16_t last_avail_idx;
>      /* Last used index value we have signalled on */
>      uint16_t signalled_used;
> @@ -92,15 +91,18 @@ struct VirtQueue
>  };
>  
>  /* virt queue functions */
> -static void virtqueue_init(VirtQueue *vq)
> +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
>  {
> -    hwaddr pa = vq->pa;
> +    VRing *vring = &vdev->vq[n].vring;
>  
> -    vq->vring.desc = pa;
> -    vq->vring.avail = pa + vq->vring.num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
> -    vq->vring.used = vring_align(vq->vring.avail +
> -                                 offsetof(VRingAvail,
ring[vq->vring.num]),
> -                                 vq->vring.align);
> +    if (!vring->desc) {
> +        /* not yet setup -> nothing to do */
> +        return;
> +    }
> +    vring->avail = vring->desc + vring->num * sizeof(VRingDesc);
> +    vring->used = vring_align(vring->avail +
> +                              offsetof(VRingAvail, ring[vring->num]),
> +                              vring->align);
>  }
>  
>  static inline uint64_t vring_desc_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, hwaddr desc_pa,
> @@ -605,7 +607,6 @@ void virtio_reset(void *opaque)
>          vdev->vq[i].vring.avail = 0;
>          vdev->vq[i].vring.used = 0;
>          vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx = 0;
> -        vdev->vq[i].pa = 0;
>          vdev->vq[i].vector = VIRTIO_NO_VECTOR;
>          vdev->vq[i].signalled_used = 0;
>          vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
> @@ -708,13 +709,21 @@ void virtio_config_writel(VirtIODevice *vdev,
uint32_t addr, uint32_t data)
>  
>  void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr addr)
>  {
> -    vdev->vq[n].pa = addr;
> -    virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
> +    vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = addr;
> +    virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, n);
>  }
>  
>  hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
>  {
> -    return vdev->vq[n].pa;
> +    return vdev->vq[n].vring.desc;
> +}
> +
> +void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
> +                            hwaddr avail, hwaddr used)
> +{
> +    vdev->vq[n].vring.desc = desc;
> +    vdev->vq[n].vring.avail = avail;
> +    vdev->vq[n].vring.used = used;
>  }
>  
>  void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num)
> @@ -728,7 +737,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
int num)
>          return;
>      }
>      vdev->vq[n].vring.num = num;
> -    virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
>  }
>  
>  int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n)
> @@ -748,6 +756,11 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
int align)
>      BusState *qbus = qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(vdev));
>      VirtioBusClass *k = VIRTIO_BUS_GET_CLASS(qbus);
>  
> +    /* virtio-1 compliant devices cannot change the aligment */
> +    if (virtio_has_feature(vdev, VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) {
> +        error_report("tried to modify queue alignment for virtio-1
device");
> +        return;
> +    }
>      /* Check that the transport told us it was going to do this
>       * (so a buggy transport will immediately assert rather than
>       * silently failing to migrate this state)
Do we have to touch this now?
It's only used by MMIO, right?

> @@ -755,7 +768,6 @@ void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
int align)
>      assert(k->has_variable_vring_alignment);
>  
>      vdev->vq[n].vring.align = align;
> -    virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[n]);
Don't we need to update rings?
>  }
>  
>  void virtio_queue_notify_vq(VirtQueue *vq)
> @@ -949,7 +961,8 @@ void virtio_save(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f)
>          if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
>              qemu_put_be32(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.align);
>          }
> -        qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].pa);
> +        /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
> +        qemu_put_be64(f, vdev->vq[i].vring.desc);
>          qemu_put_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
>          if (k->save_queue) {
>              k->save_queue(qbus->parent, i, f);
> @@ -1044,13 +1057,14 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f,
int version_id)
>          if (k->has_variable_vring_alignment) {
>              vdev->vq[i].vring.align = qemu_get_be32(f);
>          }
> -        vdev->vq[i].pa = qemu_get_be64(f);
> +        vdev->vq[i].vring.desc = qemu_get_be64(f);
>          qemu_get_be16s(f, &vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx);
>          vdev->vq[i].signalled_used_valid = false;
>          vdev->vq[i].notification = true;
>  
> -        if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
> -            virtqueue_init(&vdev->vq[i]);
> +        if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
> +            /* XXX virtio-1 devices */
What does XXX mean here?
> +            virtio_queue_update_rings(vdev, i);
>          } else if (vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx) {
>              error_report("VQ %d address 0x0 "
>                           "inconsistent with Host index 0x%x",
> @@ -1084,7 +1098,7 @@ int virtio_load(VirtIODevice *vdev, QEMUFile *f, int
version_id)
>      }
>  
>      for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> -        if (vdev->vq[i].pa) {
> +        if (vdev->vq[i].vring.desc) {
>              uint16_t nheads;
>              nheads = vring_avail_idx(&vdev->vq[i]) -
vdev->vq[i].last_avail_idx;
>              /* Check it isn't doing strange things with descriptor
numbers. */
> diff --git a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> index 68c40db..b63ced3 100644
> --- a/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> +++ b/include/hw/virtio/virtio.h
> @@ -224,6 +224,9 @@ void virtio_queue_set_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n,
hwaddr addr);
>  hwaddr virtio_queue_get_addr(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
>  void virtio_queue_set_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int num);
>  int virtio_queue_get_num(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
> +void virtio_queue_set_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, hwaddr desc,
> +                            hwaddr avail, hwaddr used);
> +void virtio_queue_update_rings(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
>  void virtio_queue_set_align(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n, int align);
>  void virtio_queue_notify(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);
>  uint16_t virtio_queue_vector(VirtIODevice *vdev, int n);

Possibly Parallel Threads

Search for more reasonably related threads

Linux Virtualization - Dec 2014 - [PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

[PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

[PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

[PATCH RFC v5 07/19] virtio: allow virtio-1 queue layout

Possibly Parallel Threads