Christopher Jacoby
2014-Mar-26 03:35 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get a simple two NIC bond to work. Got really odd behavior from service network restart, then finally decided to disable NetworkManager. Voila! Bonding and the network service script starts working just the way I expect. Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server. Chris
Johnny Hughes
2014-Mar-26 07:07 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
On 03/25/2014 10:35 PM, Christopher Jacoby wrote:> I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get a simple two NIC > bond to work. Got really odd behavior from service network restart, then > finally decided to disable NetworkManager. Voila! Bonding and the network > service script starts working just the way I expect. > > Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or > desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server.I never use NetworkManager on CentOS-5 or CentOS-6 with static IPs ... but that is more a personal preference than for any other reason. I basically only use NetworkManager on wireless laptops that are mobile because it is very easy to get an IP or connect to the VPNs I need from many different places. But I am a salty old dog .. and you know what they say about teaching us new tricks :D -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20140326/56db362b/attachment-0001.sig>
ken
2014-Mar-26 10:40 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
On 03/25/2014 11:35 PM Christopher Jacoby wrote:> I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get a simple two NIC > bond to work. Got really odd behavior from service network restart, then > finally decided to disable NetworkManager. Voila! Bonding and the network > service script starts working just the way I expect. > > Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or > desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server. > > ChrisThree or four of five times I tried using it and every time it messed things up much more than it helped. And each time, after a bit more investigation and playing around with configuration files, I got things to work without using NM. So I don't use it anymore... and don't recommend it to anyone else.
Jorge Fábregas
2014-Mar-26 10:42 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
On 03/25/2014 11:35 PM, Christopher Jacoby wrote:> Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or > desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server.Hi, I asked a similar question on the NetworkManager list a while ago: https://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2014-January/msg00061.html There's a reply from one of the developers. -- Jorge
Barry Brimer
2014-Mar-26 12:05 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
> Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or > desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server.I don't. I do some fairly complex bonding, and do not use NetworkManager at all. Make sure you have NM_CONTROLLED=no and HWADDR=<MAC address> in your interface config files. I don't even have NetworkManager installed on my servers at all.
Lamar Owen
2014-Mar-26 19:59 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
On 03/26/2014 10:40 AM, Steve Clark wrote:> Not optional? You mean I won't be able to ip a s xxxx dev xxxx, etc? > > What is you have only a serial console? >There is a cli for NM in EL7, IIRC.
Arun Khan
2014-Mar-27 04:27 UTC
[CentOS] Is there any benefit to using NetworkManager on a server with a static IP?
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Christopher Jacoby <cjacoby75 at gmail.com> wrote:> I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get a simple two NIC > bond to work. Got really odd behavior from service network restart, then > finally decided to disable NetworkManager. Voila! Bonding and the network > service script starts working just the way I expect. > > Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or > desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason to use it on a server. >IMO, Network Manager is for desktop users who may connect to the 'Net in various ways, wired LAN, WiFi, USB data dongles (from Telcom providers). With bridging and bonding scenarios, it causes more heartburn than ease of use. Server installs that I undertake personally, it is turned OFF. However, when I have had to service other admin's installation, for networking issues, I turn OFF the Network Manager. -- Arun Khan
Reasonably Related Threads
- Disappearing Network Manager config scripts
- From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
- From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
- From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files
- From Networkmanager to self managed configuration files