Hey,
I noticed that RELEASE-4.3.1 (commit 4e8e0bdef96859e6f428af74be6f4a3bc7fd11f3)
was failing to make stubdom, complaining of various forms of format string
mismatch. The following patch at least gets things to compile, but I''m
not sure if there''s a deeper underlying issue. I''m using gcc
version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu8) on x86_64. My .config contains the
line "PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG=--install-layout=deb" and I''m
./configuring with --prefix
Hope this helps.
diff --git a/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c b/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c
index 54a5e67..b6aaa6b 100644
--- a/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c
+++ b/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ again:
free(err);
}
- err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%u",
virt_to_mfn(s));
+ err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%lu",
virt_to_mfn(s));
if (err) {
message = "writing page-ref";
goto abort_transaction;
@@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ again:
free(err);
}
- err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%u",
virt_to_mfn(s));
+ err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%lu",
virt_to_mfn(s));
if (err) {
message = "writing page-ref";
goto abort_transaction;
diff --git a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c
index bbe21e0..9d0cb17 100644
--- a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c
+++ b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c
@@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ int pcifront_physical_to_virtual (struct pcifront_dev *dev,
continue;
}
- if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%x", dom, bus, slot, fun) != 4) {
+ if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%lx", dom, bus, slot, fun) != 4)
{
printk("\"%s\" does not look like a PCI device
address\n", s);
free(s);
continue;
diff --git a/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c b/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c
index ee1691b..fa2e872 100644
--- a/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c
+++ b/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c
@@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ char *xenbus_transaction_start(xenbus_transaction_t *xbt)
err = errmsg(rep);
if (err)
return err;
- sscanf((char *)(rep + 1), "%u", xbt);
+ sscanf((char *)(rep + 1), "%lu", xbt);
free(rep);
return NULL;
}
@@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ domid_t xenbus_get_self_id(void)
domid_t ret;
BUG_ON(xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, "domid", &dom_id));
- sscanf(dom_id, "%d", &ret);
+ sscanf(dom_id, "%u", (unsigned int*)&ret);
return ret;
}
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Andrew Cooper
2013-Oct-31 14:57 UTC
Re: [PATCH] Fix stubdom build failure for RELEASE-4.3.1
On 31/10/13 14:44, Alex Sharp wrote:> Hey, > > I noticed that RELEASE-4.3.1 (commit > 4e8e0bdef96859e6f428af74be6f4a3bc7fd11f3) was failing to make stubdom, > complaining of various forms of format string mismatch. The following > patch at least gets things to compile, but I''m not sure if there''s a > deeper underlying issue. I''m using gcc version 4.8.1 (Ubuntu/Linaro > 4.8.1-10ubuntu8) on x86_64. My .config contains the line > "PYTHON_PREFIX_ARG=--install-layout=deb" and I''m ./configuring with > --prefix> > Hope this helps. > > diff --git a/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c b/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c > index 54a5e67..b6aaa6b 100644 > --- a/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c > +++ b/extras/mini-os/fbfront.c > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ again: > free(err); > } > > - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%u", virt_to_mfn(s)); > + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%lu", virt_to_mfn(s)); > if (err) { > message = "writing page-ref"; > goto abort_transaction; > @@ -463,7 +463,7 @@ again: > free(err); > } > > - err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%u", virt_to_mfn(s)); > + err = xenbus_printf(xbt, nodename, "page-ref","%lu", virt_to_mfn(s));The two above here are certainly valid. virt_to_mfn() goes through many macros and ends up reading out of "unsigned long *phys_to_machine_mapping".> if (err) { > message = "writing page-ref"; > goto abort_transaction; > diff --git a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c > index bbe21e0..9d0cb17 100644 > --- a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c > +++ b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c > @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ int pcifront_physical_to_virtual (struct > pcifront_dev *dev, > continue; > } > > - if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%x", dom, bus, slot, fun) != 4) { > + if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%lx", dom, bus, slot, fun) != 4) {This is a little awkward. It has been changed in unstable and is now correct. Perhaps a subset of the change needs backporting> printk("\"%s\" does not look like a PCI device > address\n", s); > free(s); > continue; > diff --git a/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c > b/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c > index ee1691b..fa2e872 100644 > --- a/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c > +++ b/extras/mini-os/xenbus/xenbus.c > @@ -672,7 +672,7 @@ char > *xenbus_transaction_start(xenbus_transaction_t *xbt) > err = errmsg(rep); > if (err) > return err; > - sscanf((char *)(rep + 1), "%u", xbt); > + sscanf((char *)(rep + 1), "%lu", xbt);This is good> free(rep); > return NULL; > } > @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ domid_t xenbus_get_self_id(void) > domid_t ret; > > BUG_ON(xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, "domid", &dom_id)); > - sscanf(dom_id, "%d", &ret); > + sscanf(dom_id, "%u", (unsigned int*)&ret);This needs to be sscanf(dom_id, "%"SCNd16, &ret); That pointer casting there will result in stack corruption. Could you please follow the instructions http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Submitting_Xen_Patches (specifically the Signed-off-by line) and submit a patch against xen-unstable, which can then be backported appropriately. ~Andrew> > return ret; > } > > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@lists.xen.org > http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
Samuel Thibault
2013-Oct-31 18:00 UTC
Re: [PATCH] Fix stubdom build failure for RELEASE-4.3.1
Andrew Cooper, le Thu 31 Oct 2013 14:57:24 +0000, a écrit :> diff --git a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c > index bbe21e0..9d0cb17 100644 > --- a/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c > +++ b/extras/mini-os/pcifront.c > @@ -413,7 +413,7 @@ int pcifront_physical_to_virtual (struct pcifront_dev > *dev, > continue; > } > > - if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%x", dom, bus, slot, fun) != 4) { > + if (sscanf(s, "%x:%x:%x.%lx", dom, bus, slot, fun) != 4) { > > > This is a little awkward. It has been changed in unstable and is now correct.Mmm, I don''t see it fixed in unstable. I wonder why fun is an unsigned long at all, it is even passed unsigned ints in callers. pcifront_physical_to_virtual and pcifront_conf_read should just use unsigned int.> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ domid_t xenbus_get_self_id(void) > domid_t ret; > > BUG_ON(xenbus_read(XBT_NIL, "domid", &dom_id)); > - sscanf(dom_id, "%d", &ret); > + sscanf(dom_id, "%u", (unsigned int*)&ret); > > > This needs to be > > sscanf(dom_id, "%"SCNd16, &ret);Mmm, perhaps rather make ret itself an unsigned int? I''d rather not hardcode here what a domid_t is. I agree on the rest. Samuel