virendra bhati
2013-Oct-25 11:06 UTC
[asterisk-users] Is this big of new modification in Asterisk Events Objects values ?
Hi Team, Thanks for your great job an Asterisk new features developments. I installed asterisk-12 Beta and found some changes as well which i notice to put in-front of your knowledge, don't know that bug of new modification into objects or old version (asterisk-11) mistake corrected that time, anyway *Asterisk-12:* Array ( [Event] => ConfbridgeMute [Privilege] => call,all [Conference] => 42 [BridgeUniqueid] => 9f2ae5df-0749-4494-b8b7-12eb50dc765d [BridgeType] => base [BridgeTechnology] => softmix [BridgeNumChannels] => 2 [Channel] => SIP/5000-00000006 [ChannelState] => 6 [ChannelStateDesc] => Up *[CallerIDNum] => 5000* [CallerIDName] => 5000 [ConnectedLineNum] => <unknown> [ConnectedLineName] => <unknown> [AccountCode] => [Context] => from-sip [Exten] => 1234 [Priority] => 3 [Uniqueid] => 1382599433.22 ) Please check the BOLD section. earlier is was *[CallerIDnum] * *So 'n' is now 'N' * -- Thanks and regards Virendra Bhati +91-9718500594 +91-9250078532 Asterisk Engineer E-mail-: virbhati at gmail.com Skype id:- virbhati2 New Delhi(India) [image: View my profile on LinkedIn]<http://in.linkedin.com/pub/virendra-bhati/6/a30/755> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20131025/27b4dc62/attachment.html>
jg
2013-Oct-25 11:46 UTC
[asterisk-users] Is this big of new modification in Asterisk Events Objects values ?
Does it matter? I thought keys are case insensitive. jg
Paul Belanger
2013-Oct-25 14:46 UTC
[asterisk-users] Is this big of new modification in Asterisk Events Objects values ?
On 13-10-25 07:06 AM, virendra bhati wrote:> Hi Team, > > Thanks for your great job an Asterisk new features developments. I > installed asterisk-12 Beta and found some changes as well which i notice to > put in-front of your knowledge, don't know that bug of new modification > into objects or old version (asterisk-11) mistake corrected that time, > anyway > > *Asterisk-12:* > > Array > ( > [Event] => ConfbridgeMute > [Privilege] => call,all > [Conference] => 42 > [BridgeUniqueid] => 9f2ae5df-0749-4494-b8b7-12eb50dc765d > [BridgeType] => base > [BridgeTechnology] => softmix > [BridgeNumChannels] => 2 > [Channel] => SIP/5000-00000006 > [ChannelState] => 6 > [ChannelStateDesc] => Up > *[CallerIDNum] => 5000* > [CallerIDName] => 5000 > [ConnectedLineNum] => <unknown> > [ConnectedLineName] => <unknown> > [AccountCode] => > [Context] => from-sip > [Exten] => 1234 > [Priority] => 3 > [Uniqueid] => 1382599433.22 > ) > > Please check the BOLD section. earlier is was *[CallerIDnum] > > * > *So 'n' is now 'N' > * >Asterisk AMI got basically a rewrite[1] of how it works, so there are some breaking changes moving forward. Read ChangeLog and UPGRADE.txt in the source tree for more information. [1] https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/AMI+1.4+Specification -- Paul Belanger | PolyBeacon, Inc. Jabber: paul.belanger at polybeacon.com | IRC: pabelanger (Freenode) Github: https://github.com/pabelanger | Twitter: https://twitter.com/pabelanger