Hello,
I''m hoping this is the right place to ask these kind of questions. If
not,
please excuse me. Anyway, the problem I''m having is that I have a HTML
table
showing some tabular data and I want to use Effect.SlideDown/Up to allow the
user to interactively show "details" for each item
(<tr><td> etc) in that
list.
I''ll do some pseudo-code for easier reading:
<table>
<tr>
<td>headline</td><td>summary</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a onclick="new
Effect.SlideDown(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">problems</a></td><td>having
problems with script.aculo.us</td>
</tr>
this is where I''m facing difficulties. I want another table row to
appear
"onclick", like this:
<tr id="info-container">
<td colspan="2">full story here <a onclick="new
Effect.SlideUp(
document.getElementById(''info-container''))">hide
me</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
but I don''t want it to be visible at all except for when the user
actually
clicks "problems". I''ve tried various solutions, but to no
avail.
Perhaps a pair of fresh eyes could shed some light on the situation?
--
Mvh,
Eskil Kvalnes
eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
Eskil Kvalnes wrote: [snip]> <table> > <tr> > <td>headline</td><td>summary</td> > </tr> > > <tr> > <td><a onclick="new > Effect.SlideDown(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">problems</a></td><td>having > problems with script.aculo.us <http://script.aculo.us></td> > </tr>You can just make that Effect.SlideDown(''info-container'');> this is where I''m facing difficulties. I want another table row to > appear "onclick", like this: > > <tr id="info-container"> > <td colspan="2">full story here <a onclick="new > Effect.SlideUp(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">hide me</a></td> > </tr> > </table> > > but I don''t want it to be visible at all except for when the user > actually clicks "problems". I''ve tried various solutions, but to no avail. > Perhaps a pair of fresh eyes could shed some light on the situation?Just add a style="display:none" attribute to it. -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP
On 7/10/06, Michael Peters <mpeters-aUYv5hkjw45l57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > > Eskil Kvalnes wrote: > [snip] > > <table> > > <tr> > > <td>headline</td><td>summary</td> > > </tr> > > > > <tr> > > <td><a onclick="new > > Effect.SlideDown(document.getElementById > (''info-container''))">problems</a></td><td>having > > problems with script.aculo.us <http://script.aculo.us></td> > > </tr> > > You can just make that > Effect.SlideDown(''info-container'');Oh, nice tip. Thanks.> this is where I''m facing difficulties. I want another table row to > > appear "onclick", like this: > > > > <tr id="info-container"> > > <td colspan="2">full story here <a onclick="new > > Effect.SlideUp(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">hide > me</a></td> > > </tr> > > </table> > > > > but I don''t want it to be visible at all except for when the user > > actually clicks "problems". I''ve tried various solutions, but to no > avail. > > Perhaps a pair of fresh eyes could shed some light on the situation? > > Just add a style="display:none" attribute to it.Of course! However, this presented a new problem. Still using SlideDown/Up, but it doesn''t "slide" at all. On SlideDown it just appears instantly and on SlideUp is takes 0.5s/1s before it disappears. No sliding/fading/movement whatsoever. Seems strange to me... I had the desired effect when using <div id="info-container"><div>text</div></div> --> Michael Peters > Developer > Plus Three, LP > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-spinoffs mailing list > Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs >-- Mvh, Eskil Kvalnes eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I may be mistaken. -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Eskil Kvalnes Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 4:05 PM To: rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Effect.SlideDown/Up() and HTML issues On 7/10/06, Michael Peters < mpeters-aUYv5hkjw45l57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> wrote: Eskil Kvalnes wrote: [snip]> <table> > <tr> > <td>headline</td><td>summary</td> > </tr> > > <tr> > <td><a onclick="new > Effect.SlideDown(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">problems</a></td><td>having > problems with script.aculo.us < <http://script.aculo.us> http://script.aculo.us></td> > </tr>You can just make that Effect.SlideDown(''info-container''); Oh, nice tip. Thanks.> this is where I''m facing difficulties. I want another table row to > appear "onclick", like this: > > <tr id="info-container"> > <td colspan="2">full story here <a onclick="new > Effect.SlideUp(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">hide me</a></td> > </tr> > </table> > > but I don''t want it to be visible at all except for when the user > actually clicks "problems". I''ve tried various solutions, but to no avail. > Perhaps a pair of fresh eyes could shed some light on the situation?Just add a style="display:none" attribute to it. Of course! However, this presented a new problem. Still using SlideDown/Up, but it doesn''t "slide" at all. On SlideDown it just appears instantly and on SlideUp is takes 0.5s/1s before it disappears. No sliding/fading/movement whatsoever. Seems strange to me... I had the desired effect when using <div id="info-container"><div>text</div></div> -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org <mailto:Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs -- Mvh, Eskil Kvalnes eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
Eskil Kvalnes wrote:> > > On 7/10/06, *Bauser, Joseph (Joe)* <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > <mailto:Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I > may be mistaken.Use divs :) -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP
On 7/10/06, Bauser, Joseph (Joe) <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I may > be mistaken. >You seem to be right... no available workaround to this or a somewhat similar function available?> On 7/10/06, Michael Peters <mpeters-aUYv5hkjw45l57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > Eskil Kvalnes wrote: > > [snip] > > > <table> > > > <tr> > > > <td>headline</td><td>summary</td> > > > </tr> > > > > > > <tr> > > > <td><a onclick="new > > > Effect.SlideDown(document.getElementById > > (''info-container''))">problems</a></td><td>having > > > problems with script.aculo.us < http://script.aculo.us></td> > > > </tr> > > > > You can just make that > > Effect.SlideDown(''info-container''); > > > Oh, nice tip. Thanks. > > > this is where I''m facing difficulties. I want another table row to > > > appear "onclick", like this: > > > > > > <tr id="info-container"> > > > <td colspan="2">full story here <a onclick="new > > > Effect.SlideUp(document.getElementById(''info-container''))">hide > > me</a></td> > > > </tr> > > > </table> > > > > > > but I don''t want it to be visible at all except for when the user > > > actually clicks "problems". I''ve tried various solutions, but to no > > avail. > > > Perhaps a pair of fresh eyes could shed some light on the situation? > > > > Just add a style="display:none" attribute to it. > > > Of course! However, this presented a new problem. Still using > SlideDown/Up, but it doesn''t "slide" > at all. On SlideDown it just appears instantly and on SlideUp is takes > 0.5s/1s before it disappears. > No sliding/fading/movement whatsoever. Seems strange to me... I had the > desired effect when using > <div id="info-container"><div>text</div></div> > > -- > > Michael Peters > > Developer > > Plus Three, LP > > > > -- > > Mvh, > Eskil Kvalnes > eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org > > --Mvh, Eskil Kvalnes eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
There are certain things you should not drag and drop, or animate. Some of these elements are input elements in FireFox, the other things are always tables. Tables do not lend themselves easily to anything dynamic. This isn''t saying you can''t, I''m just saying it doesn''t always work or has weird side effects, especially in IE. As per Michael Peters, use DIV''s. -Andrew Martinez -----Original Message----- From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto:rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Michael Peters Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 4:18 PM To: rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org Subject: Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Effect.SlideDown/Up() and HTML issues Eskil Kvalnes wrote:> > > On 7/10/06, *Bauser, Joseph (Joe)* <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > <mailto:Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I > may be mistaken.Use divs :) -- Michael Peters Developer Plus Three, LP _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
On 7/10/06, Michael Peters <mpeters-aUYv5hkjw45l57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > > Eskil Kvalnes wrote: > > > > > > On 7/10/06, *Bauser, Joseph (Joe)* <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > > <mailto:Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > > > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I > > may be mistaken. > > Use divs :)Hehe, I changed from SlideDown/Up to Grow/Shrink. Created a nice effect on the contents of the table. Thanks a lot for your help and input! :) --> Michael Peters > Developer > Plus Three, LP > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-spinoffs mailing list > Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs >-- Mvh, Eskil Kvalnes eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
On 7/10/06, Martinez, Andrew <Andrew.Martinez-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > There are certain things you should not drag and drop, or animate. Some of > these elements are input elements in FireFox, the other things are always > tables. Tables do not lend themselves easily to anything dynamic. This isn''t > saying you can''t, I''m just saying it doesn''t always work or has weird side > effects, especially in IE. > > As per Michael Peters, use DIV''s.I probably would''ve had I not had a lot of tabular data like this. I have the luxury of not having to worry about IE at all; it''s a private site for me and my friends and we all use FF. As long as it works there, I don''t care ;) -Andrew Martinez> > -----Original Message----- > From: rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org [mailto: > rails-spinoffs-bounces-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Michael Peters > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2006 4:18 PM > To: rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > Subject: Re: [Rails-spinoffs] Effect.SlideDown/Up() and HTML issues > > > Eskil Kvalnes wrote: > > > > > > On 7/10/06, *Bauser, Joseph (Joe)* <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org > > <mailto:Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>> wrote: > > > > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I > > may be mistaken. > > Use divs :) > > -- > Michael Peters > Developer > Plus Three, LP > > _______________________________________________ > Rails-spinoffs mailing list > Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs > _______________________________________________ > Rails-spinoffs mailing list > Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs >-- Mvh, Eskil Kvalnes eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
Well, then you might try wrapping the entire table in a div, and applying the effect to that... TAG On Jul 10, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Eskil Kvalnes wrote:> > > On 7/10/06, Martinez, Andrew <Andrew.Martinez-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > There are certain things you should not drag and drop, or animate. > Some of these elements are input elements in FireFox, the other > things are always tables. Tables do not lend themselves easily to > anything dynamic. This isn''t saying you can''t, I''m just saying it > doesn''t always work or has weird side effects, especially in IE. > > As per Michael Peters, use DIV''s. > > I probably would''ve had I not had a lot of tabular data like this. > I have the luxury > of not having to worry about IE at all; it''s a private site for me > and my friends > and we all use FF. As long as it works there, I don''t care ;)_______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
On 7/10/06, Eskil Kvalnes wrote:> On 7/10/06, Martinez, Andrew wrote:> > As per Michael Peters, use DIV''s. > > I probably would''ve had I not had a lot of tabular data like this. I have > the luxury of not having to worry about IE at all; it''s a private site for > me and my friends and we all use FF. As long as it works there, I don''t > care ;)OK, that was just mean. "Hi guys! I live in a perfect world! Don''t you wish you could, too!? Nyah nyah!" ;-) (Just kidding! Sort of. Most of us wish we never had to deal with IE.)
<sigh> IE free....what a wonderful world it would be... On 7/10/06, Seth Dillingham <seth.dillingham-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On 7/10/06, Eskil Kvalnes wrote: > > > On 7/10/06, Martinez, Andrew wrote: > > > > As per Michael Peters, use DIV''s. > > > > I probably would''ve had I not had a lot of tabular data like this. I have > > the luxury of not having to worry about IE at all; it''s a private site for > > me and my friends and we all use FF. As long as it works there, I don''t > > care ;) > > OK, that was just mean. "Hi guys! I live in a perfect world! Don''t you wish > you could, too!? Nyah nyah!" > > ;-) > > (Just kidding! Sort of. Most of us wish we never had to deal with IE.) > _______________________________________________ > Rails-spinoffs mailing list > Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs >
On 7/11/06, Eskil Kvalnes <eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > > > On 7/10/06, Bauser, Joseph (Joe) <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I may be > mistaken. > > > You seem to be right... no available workaround to this or a somewhat > similar > function available?I''ve been using a technique where I''ve had a hidden <tr><td colspan="x"> (where x = total number of columns). Inside the <td> I have a <div> that is also hidden (display:none), when I start the effect I show the <tr> and then animate the <div> inside it. It worked, but I''m not sure about browser portability the solution didn''t make it out of "idea-stage" (and I don''t normally test with IE as I''m a Mac-bigot).
On 7/11/06, Jon Tirsen <jon-fQK1VBTDpnXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > On 7/11/06, Eskil Kvalnes <eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 7/10/06, Bauser, Joseph (Joe) <Joseph.Bauser-9sMr025MA47QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > If I remember correctly, you can''t use that effect on tables. But I > may be > > mistaken. > > > > > > You seem to be right... no available workaround to this or a somewhat > > similar > > function available? > > I''ve been using a technique where I''ve had a hidden <tr><td > colspan="x"> (where x = total number of columns). Inside the <td> I > have a <div> that is also hidden (display:none), when I start the > effect I show the <tr> and then animate the <div> inside it. It > worked, but I''m not sure about browser portability the solution didn''t > make it out of "idea-stage" (and I don''t normally test with IE as I''m > a Mac-bigot).That is sort of how it is working now, although I had to change from SlideDown/Up to Grow/Shrink for an effect to show. My main goal was to animate the new table row sliding from underneath the row above. It seems to me that with your approach the row would just appear and then the effect would apply to the contents of that row. I could probably re-create the effect wanted, to a certain level, by using <tr style="margin: 0px; padding: 0px"> and then use javascript to increment those numbers gradually. But that seems kind of half-assed in my opinion. _______________________________________________> Rails-spinoffs mailing list > Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs >-- Mvh, Eskil Kvalnes eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org _______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
On 7/10/06, Eskil Kvalnes <eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:> On 7/11/06, Jon Tirsen <jon-fQK1VBTDpnXQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> wrote: > > I''ve been using a technique where I''ve had a hidden <tr><td > > colspan="x"> (where x = total number of columns). Inside the <td> I > > have a <div> that is also hidden (display:none), when I start the > > effect I show the <tr> and then animate the <div> inside it. It > > worked, but I''m not sure about browser portability the solution didn''t > > make it out of "idea-stage" (and I don''t normally test with IE as I''m > > a Mac-bigot). > > It seems to me that with your approach the row would just appear > and then the effect would apply to the contents of that row.Why? Without testing it, I''d speculate that when the <tr/td> is shown, its height would be 0 (or near-0 depending on styles applied) because the inner div would be set display:none and have no place in the page flow. The animation would then gradually grow the div and the <tr/td> would expand with it. Todd
On 7/11/06, Todd Ross <rails-spinoffs-25kFIyuv2iRiLUuM0BA3LQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > Why? Without testing it, I''d speculate that when the <tr/td> is > shown, its height would be 0 (or near-0 depending on styles applied) > because the inner div would be set display:none and have no place in > the page flow. The animation would then gradually grow the div and > the <tr/td> would expand with it.Yeah, that''s pretty much how it looks. It seems to be about one or two pixels high (but that probably depends on padding and stuff) and then it immediately starts "sliding" out because of the effect for the div inside it. It doesn''t look perfect (there''s a small "jump" when it starts) but it looks pretty good. Once again I have know idea what IE would do.
Take a look at the code Apple used on the Aperture page
http://www.apple.com/aperture/
It uses Effect.SlideDown and works very well.
the JS file is here:
http://wdirect.apple.com/aperture/aperture3.js
Effect.SlideUpAndDown = function(element) {
element = $(element);
if (Element.visible(element)) {
new Effect.SlideUp(element, { duration: 0.25 });
var oImg = document.getElementById(element.id+''-img'');
oImg.src =
''/aperture/images/''+element.id+''_normal.gif'';
} else {
new Effect.SlideDown(element, { duration: 0.25 });
}
}
Effect.CheckState = function(element) {
element = $(element);
if(Element.visible(element)) {
new Effect.SlideUp(element, { duration: 0.25 });
var oImg = document.getElementById(element.id+''-img'');
oImg.src =
''/aperture/images/''+element.id+''_normal.gif'';
}
}
______________________________________________________________________
Alex Duffield . Principal . InControl Solutions . http://
www.incontrolsolutions.com
On 10-Jul-06, at 9:27 AM, Eskil Kvalnes wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I''m hoping this is the right place to ask these kind of questions.
> If not, please excuse me. Anyway, the problem I''m having is that I
> have a HTML table
> showing some tabular data and I want to use Effect.SlideDown /Up to
> allow the user to interactively show "details" for each item
> (<tr><td> etc) in that list.
>
> I''ll do some pseudo-code for easier reading:
>
> <table>
> <tr>
> <td>headline</td><td>summary</td>
> </tr>
>
> <tr>
> <td><a onclick="new
Effect.SlideDown(document.getElementById
>
(''info-container''))">problems</a></td><td>having
problems with
> script.aculo.us</td>
> </tr>
>
> this is where I''m facing difficulties. I want another table row to
> appear "onclick", like this:
>
> <tr id="info-container">
> <td colspan="2">full story here <a onclick="new
Effect.SlideUp
> (document.getElementById(''info-container''))">hide
me</a></td>
> </tr>
>
> </table>
>
> but I don''t want it to be visible at all except for when the user
> actually clicks "problems". I''ve tried various
solutions, but to no
> avail.
> Perhaps a pair of fresh eyes could shed some light on the situation?
> --
>
> Mvh,
> Eskil Kvalnes
> eskil.kvalnes-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-spinoffs mailing list
> Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
Rails-spinoffs-1W37MKcQCpIf0INCOvqR/iCwEArCW2h5@public.gmane.org
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
Martinez, Andrew wrote:>There are certain things you should not drag and drop, or animate. Some of these elements are input elements in FireFox >Can you elaborate on these problems? I am currently working on dragging and dropping some stuff which includes some input fields. So far it works fine, but now I''m worried I have a rude awakening coming. My stuff has to work in both Firefox and IE so I do a lot of testing on both. So far I have not seen any problems with this. Whats the story here? Thanks, -- Will Merrell