Paul Durrant
2013-Sep-20 12:56 UTC
[PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to transition through Closing
Some old Windows frontends fail to transition through the xenbus Closing state and move directly from Connected to Closed. Handle this case properly. Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> --- drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c index a53782e..bcaa25b 100644 --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, break; case XenbusStateClosed: + if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected) + disconnect_backend(dev); xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed); if (xenbus_dev_is_online(dev)) break; -- 1.7.10.4
Wei Liu
2013-Sep-20 13:34 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to transition through Closing
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:31PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:> Some old Windows frontends fail to transition through the xenbus Closing > state and move directly from Connected to Closed. Handle this case properly. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> > Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > --- > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > index a53782e..bcaa25b 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, > break; > > case XenbusStateClosed: > + if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected) > + disconnect_backend(dev);Could you please add a comment above this change stating that this is a workaround for some old frontend that we cannot fix / upgrade. We would still like to later frontend goes through the normal connected -> closing -> closed path. Wei.> xenbus_switch_state(dev, XenbusStateClosed); > if (xenbus_dev_is_online(dev)) > break; > -- > 1.7.10.4
Paul Durrant
2013-Sep-20 13:38 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to transition through Closing
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.liu2@citrix.com] > Sent: 20 September 2013 14:35 > To: Paul Durrant > Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; David Vrabel; Wei Liu; > Ian Campbell > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to > transition through Closing > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:31PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > > Some old Windows frontends fail to transition through the xenbus Closing > > state and move directly from Connected to Closed. Handle this case > properly. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durrant@citrix.com> > > Cc: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> > > Cc: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com> > > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> > > --- > > drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c b/drivers/net/xen- > netback/xenbus.c > > index a53782e..bcaa25b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > > @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device > *dev, > > break; > > > > case XenbusStateClosed: > > + if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected) > > + disconnect_backend(dev); > > Could you please add a comment above this change stating that this is a > workaround for some old frontend that we cannot fix / upgrade. > > We would still like to later frontend goes through the normal connected > -> closing -> closed path. >Sure. I''ll re-post the series with that change. Paul
David Vrabel
2013-Sep-20 13:38 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to transition through Closing
On 20/09/13 14:34, Wei Liu wrote:> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:31PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: >> Some old Windows frontends fail to transition through the xenbus Closing >> state and move directly from Connected to Closed. Handle this case properly. >> >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c >> @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, >> break; >> >> case XenbusStateClosed: >> + if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected) >> + disconnect_backend(dev); > > Could you please add a comment above this change stating that this is a > workaround for some old frontend that we cannot fix / upgrade.Handling frontend CONNECTED -> CLOSED is a sensible thing for a backend to do regardless of whether there are old frontends that do this or not.> We would still like to later frontend goes through the normal connected > -> closing -> closed path.This should be documented as a full description of the two state machines in public/io/netif.h in Xen. Not scattered about in comments in a particular backend implementation. David
Paul Durrant
2013-Sep-20 13:40 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to transition through Closing
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Vrabel > Sent: 20 September 2013 14:39 > To: Wei Liu > Cc: Paul Durrant; netdev@vger.kernel.org; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Ian > Campbell > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to > transition through Closing > > On 20/09/13 14:34, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:31PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> Some old Windows frontends fail to transition through the xenbus Closing > >> state and move directly from Connected to Closed. Handle this case > properly. > >> > >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct > xenbus_device *dev, > >> break; > >> > >> case XenbusStateClosed: > >> + if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected) > >> + disconnect_backend(dev); > > > > Could you please add a comment above this change stating that this is a > > workaround for some old frontend that we cannot fix / upgrade. > > Handling frontend CONNECTED -> CLOSED is a sensible thing for a backend > to do regardless of whether there are old frontends that do this or not. >Agreed, but probably still worth the comment in case someone gets the wrong idea. Paul> > We would still like to later frontend goes through the normal connected > > -> closing -> closed path. > > This should be documented as a full description of the two state > machines in public/io/netif.h in Xen. Not scattered about in comments > in a particular backend implementation. > > David
Wei Liu
2013-Sep-20 13:48 UTC
Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] xen-netback: handle frontends that fail to transition through Closing
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 02:38:46PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:> On 20/09/13 14:34, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 01:56:31PM +0100, Paul Durrant wrote: > >> Some old Windows frontends fail to transition through the xenbus Closing > >> state and move directly from Connected to Closed. Handle this case properly. > >> > >> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/xenbus.c > >> @@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static void frontend_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, > >> break; > >> > >> case XenbusStateClosed: > >> + if (dev->state == XenbusStateConnected) > >> + disconnect_backend(dev); > > > > Could you please add a comment above this change stating that this is a > > workaround for some old frontend that we cannot fix / upgrade. > > Handling frontend CONNECTED -> CLOSED is a sensible thing for a backend > to do regardless of whether there are old frontends that do this or not. >I agree handling connected -> closed is sensible here based on the fact that old frontends could do such state change. However If the state machine was documented well enough then I think connected -> closed would not be considered sensible. This code snippet without comment will cause confusion / encourage wrong usage of state machine if someone comes here for reference.> > We would still like to later frontend goes through the normal connected > > -> closing -> closed path. > > This should be documented as a full description of the two state > machines in public/io/netif.h in Xen. Not scattered about in commentsSure.> in a particular backend implementation. >The comment in implementation is still worthwhile in case someone comes here for reference and gets confused. Wei.> David
Possibly Parallel Threads
- [PATCH net] xen-netback: fix fragment detection in checksum setup
- [PATCH net-next v3 5/5] xen-netback: enable IPv6 TCP GSO to the guest
- [PATCH] kdump: introduce "reset_devices" command line option
- [PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices
- [PATCH 0001/001] xen: multi page ring support for block devices