Commit 1104a8855 added an error branch that forgot to release the super
bh. I found this while looking for an unrelated double brelse.
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
---
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
index 254cdc8..ca1e25f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -2329,6 +2329,7 @@ int open_ctree(struct super_block *sb,
if (btrfs_check_super_csum(bh->b_data)) {
printk(KERN_ERR "btrfs: superblock checksum mismatch\n");
err = -EINVAL;
+ brelse(bh);
goto fail_alloc;
}
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Device removal currently causes bdev removal to try to double free a bh
in the bdev:
[ 55.714833] WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1160 __brelse+0x36/0x40()
[ 55.714833] VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer
Commit 7e3d9ebb1 added a double release of the bh for a device being
removed when all the supers don''t fit in the device. In that case it
releases the bh assuming that it''s going to read a new one, finds that
it won''t read, and goes to a label that releases the bh again.
All it needed to do was only brelse() right before overwriting the
current bh with __bread().
Signed-off-by: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
---
fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 090f57c..adb0bca 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -1656,11 +1656,12 @@ int btrfs_rm_device(struct btrfs_root *root, char
*device_path)
* the below would take of the rest
*/
for (i = 1; i < BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX; i++) {
- brelse(bh);
bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(i);
if (bytenr + BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE > i_size_read(bdev->bd_inode))
break;
+
+ brelse(bh);
bh = __bread(bdev, bytenr / 4096,
BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_SIZE);
if (!bh)
--
1.7.11.7
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Josef Bacik
2013-Aug-09 21:05 UTC
Re: [PATCH 2/2] btrfs: don''t double brelse on device rm
On Fri, Aug 09, 2013 at 01:37:14PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:> Device removal currently causes bdev removal to try to double free a bh > in the bdev: > > [ 55.714833] WARNING: at fs/buffer.c:1160 __brelse+0x36/0x40() > [ 55.714833] VFS: brelse: Trying to free free buffer > > Commit 7e3d9ebb1 added a double release of the bh for a device being > removed when all the supers don''t fit in the device. In that case it > releases the bh assuming that it''s going to read a new one, finds that > it won''t read, and goes to a label that releases the bh again. > > All it needed to do was only brelse() right before overwriting the > current bh with __bread().I''ve dropped this patch so we don''t need this anymore. Thanks, Josef -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html