Jensen
2013-Jun-29 03:27 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] why oracle give up dlm by disk on ocfs2? because performance?
Hi all, I found ocfs1.0 use the Distributed lock manager by disk. on ocfs2 why give up? because performance or other reason? Btw: on the ocfs1.0 why not use scsi-2/3 reservation to protect to update the dlm sector data? Thanks, Jensen.
Jensen
2013-Jul-02 01:22 UTC
[Ocfs2-devel] why oracle give up dlm by disk on ocfs2? because performance?
Hi Mark, sunil, jeff an Joel, Do you know why ? Thanks. Jensen. 2013-7-2 On 2013/6/29 11:27, Jensen wrote:> Hi all, > I found ocfs1.0 use the Distributed lock manager by disk. on ocfs2 why give up? because performance or other reason? > > Btw: > on the ocfs1.0 why not use scsi-2/3 reservation to protect to update the dlm sector data? > > Thanks, > Jensen. > > > _______________________________________________ > Ocfs2-devel mailing list > Ocfs2-devel at oss.oracle.com > https://oss.oracle.com/mailman/listinfo/ocfs2-devel > >