freebsd stable - May 2013 - Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command

Dear colleagues,

is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in

http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291

(the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to one-liner
per
provider; old output is retained as `list' command)

to at least stable/9 ?

The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related
scripts
which one use in production.

If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from trociny, 
thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.

Thanks!

-- 
Sincerely,
D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
[ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck at FreeBSD.org ]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
------------------------------------------------------------------------

On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:54:56AM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky
wrote:
> Dear colleagues,
> 
> is there any objection for MFCing the change introduced in
> 
> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
> 
> (the most major change: compacting output of `hastctl status' to
one-liner per
> provider; old output is retained as `list' command)
> 
> to at least stable/9 ?
 
If we agreed to merge, I would prefer to both stable/9 and 8 to have
divergence between branches as minimal as possible.
> The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related
scripts
> which one use in production.
> 
> If no objections are received I'm (with the generous support from
trociny,
> thank you Mikolaj!) tend to merge it after, say, 2 weeks.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Sincerely,
> D.Marck                                     [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN]
> [ FreeBSD committer:                                 marck at FreeBSD.org ]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck at rinet.ru ***
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at
freebsd.org"
-- 
Mikolaj Golub

> http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291
...
> The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related
scripts
> which one use in production.

Any chance we could do this is 2 stages - first being to add 'list' to
give us a chnace
ti change scripts over, then make the chnages to 'status'. I have
scripts
which try and parse the outut from 'status' which will need changing,
and I sspect I am not the only one...

cheers,

-pete.