Ok, I''ve went and confused myself again :( With the following rules:
tc qdisc add dev eth0 root handle 1: htb default 255
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1: classid 1:1 htb rate 10mbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:255 htb rate 64kbit ceil
128kbit
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:255 sfq perturb 10
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:1 classid 1:10 htb rate 4Mbit ceil 5Mbit
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:10 classid 1:11 htb rate 256kbit \
   ceil 512kbit prio 1
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:10 classid 1:12 htb rate 256kbit \
   ceil 512kbit prio 2
tc class add dev eth0 parent 1:10 classid 1:13 htb rate 256kbit \
   ceil 512kbit prio 3
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:11 handle 11: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:12 handle 12: sfq perturb 10
tc qdisc add dev eth0 parent 1:13 handle 13: sfq perturb 10
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 11 fw classid 1:11
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 12 fw classid 1:12
tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 13 fw classid 1:13
	And the folowing fmarks:
 pkts bytes target     prot opt in     out     source              
destination         
   33  3308 MARK       udp  --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0           
0.0.0.0/0          MARK set 0xb 
    0     0 MARK       tcp  --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0           
0.0.0.0/0          tcp dpt:53 MARK set 0xb 
  288 44869 MARK       tcp  --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0           
0.0.0.0/0          tcp dpt:80 MARK set 0xc 
 1204  133K MARK       ah   --  eth1   *       0.0.0.0/0           
0.0.0.0/0          MARK set 0xd 
	Why is it everything goes to 1:255, the default?
--- 
Homer Parker                  /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign
                              \ / No HTML/RTF in email
http://www.homershut.net       x  No Word docs in email
telnet://bbs.homershut.net    / \ Respect for open standards
This e-mail message is 100% Microsoft free!
WARNING: THIS ACCOUNT BELONGS TO A RABID
ANTI-SPAMMER NET-NAZI DOT-COMMUNIST!!
On Tuesday 24 December 2002 05:47, Homer Parker wrote:> Ok, I''ve went and confused myself again :( With the following rules: > > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 11 fw classid 1:11 > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 12 fw classid 1:12 > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 13 fw classid 1:13Shouldn''t this be parent 1: ????? Stef -- stef.coene@docum.org "Using Linux as bandwidth manager" http://www.docum.org/ #lartc @ irc.oftc.net _______________________________________________ LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/
On Tue, 24 Dec 2002 09:37:48 +0100 Stef Coene <stef.coene@docum.org> wrote....> On Tuesday 24 December 2002 05:47, Homer Parker wrote: > > Ok, I''ve went and confused myself again :( With the following > > rules: > > > > tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 11 fw classid > > 1:11 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 12 fw > > classid 1:12 tc filter add dev eth0 parent 1:10 protocol ip handle 13 > > fw classid 1:13 > Shouldn''t this be parent 1: ?????That got it, thanks! --- Homer Parker /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / No HTML/RTF in email http://www.homershut.net x No Word docs in email telnet://bbs.homershut.net / \ Respect for open standards This e-mail message is 100% Microsoft free! WARNING: THIS ACCOUNT BELONGS TO A RABID ANTI-SPAMMER NET-NAZI DOT-COMMUNIST!!