On Monday 21 April 2003 05:12, rio@martin.mu wrote:> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: Martin A. Brown mabrown-lartc@securepipe.com
>
> >I would suggest the following configuration (as Stef has proposed):
> > 128kbit ceil 128kbit +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <--
192.168.1.1
> >
> > +---------------+---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <--
192.168.1.2
> >
> > +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <--
192.168.1.3
> >
> > +---- rate 32kbit ceil 128kbit <--
192.168.1.4
> >Now, you have four different classes, one for each IP. Each IP is
> >guaranteed 128kbit. Each IP can consume up to 128kbit, if there
isn''t
> >competition with other classes.
>
> Dear Martin,
> I ve implemented before just exactly as you have described above, but the
> main problem was when some host, 192.168.1.4 for example, use DAP that open
> about 10 tcp streams, that host will get 128Kbit maximum when the other
> hosts in idle connection. But as soon as other host up and request for
> bandwidth, 192.168.1.4 wont decrease the speed of download into 32Kbit. I
> wonder why this is happened ?
If you have 2 active userx, each user should get 50% so 64 kbit.
I don''t understand why this is not happening. I created 2 class with
each 50%
of the bandwidth. I had 5 tcp streams in 1 class so that class uses 100% of
the bandwidth. The moment I started a tcp stream in the other class, that
class got 50% like expected. So it works in my test setup.
Are you sure your filters are working? And how do you monitor the classes?
Stef
--
stef.coene@docum.org
"Using Linux as bandwidth manager"
http://www.docum.org/
#lartc @ irc.oftc.net
_______________________________________________
LARTC mailing list / LARTC@mailman.ds9a.nl
http://mailman.ds9a.nl/mailman/listinfo/lartc HOWTO: http://lartc.org/