Josef Bacik
2013-Feb-01 21:05 UTC
[PATCH] Btrfs: account for orphan inodes properly during cleanup
Dave sent me a panic where we were doing the orphan cleanup and panic''ed trying to release our reservation from the orphan block rsv. The reason for this is because our orphan block rsv had been free''d out from underneath us because the transaction commit found that there were no orphan inodes according to its count and decided to free it. This is incorrect so make sure we inc the orphan inodes count so the accounting is all done properly. This would also cause the warning in the orphan commit code normally if you had any orphans to cleanup as they would only decrement the orphan count so you''d get a negative orphan count which could cause problems during runtime. Thanks, Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> --- fs/btrfs/inode.c | 1 + 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c index 804a34b..5398883 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c @@ -2502,6 +2502,7 @@ int btrfs_orphan_cleanup(struct btrfs_root *root) */ set_bit(BTRFS_INODE_HAS_ORPHAN_ITEM, &BTRFS_I(inode)->runtime_flags); + atomic_inc(&root->orphan_inodes); /* if we have links, this was a truncate, lets do that */ if (inode->i_nlink) { -- 1.7.7.6 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
David Sterba
2013-Feb-05 10:01 UTC
Re: [PATCH] Btrfs: account for orphan inodes properly during cleanup
On Fri, Feb 01, 2013 at 04:05:17PM -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:> Dave sent me a panic where we were doing the orphan cleanup and panic''ed > trying to release our reservation from the orphan block rsv. The reason for > this is because our orphan block rsv had been free''d out from underneath us > because the transaction commit found that there were no orphan inodes > according to its count and decided to free it. This is incorrect so make > sure we inc the orphan inodes count so the accounting is all done properly. > This would also cause the warning in the orphan commit code normally if you > had any orphans to cleanup as they would only decrement the orphan count so > you''d get a negative orphan count which could cause problems during runtime. > Thanks,Thanks. I''ve tried to reproduce it with an unpatched kernel, but was unsuccesful (the same test was running for 3 days) and can''t reliably verify your fix. Looks like a very tiny race. david -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html