I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data
on there.
After a reboot, I tried to mount it again
# mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0
mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on
/dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0,
missing codepage or helper program, or other error
In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
dmesg | tail or so
I checked dmesg:
[17216.145092] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
[17216.145639] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
[17216.146987] btrfs: failed to read the system array on dm-100
[17216.147556] btrfs: open_ctree failed
Then I did btrfsck - it reported no errors, but mounted OK:
# btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
checking extents
checking fs roots
checking root refs
found 26848493568 bytes used err is 0
total csum bytes: 26170252
total tree bytes: 48517120
total fs tree bytes: 5492736
btree space waste bytes: 14307930
file data blocks allocated: 26799976448
referenced 26799976448
Btrfs Btrfs v0.19
# mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0
#
I checked dmesg again, these are the messages from the second mount:
[17299.180600] device fsid 928b939f-7f9d-4095-b1ba-e35c5f1277bf devid 1
transid 37928 /dev/dm-96
[17299.204475] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 2
transid 34 /dev/dm-99
[17299.204658] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
transid 34 /dev/dm-100
[17299.288317] device fsid 928b939f-7f9d-4095-b1ba-e35c5f1277bf devid 1
transid 37928 /dev/dm-96
[17299.289024] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 2
transid 34 /dev/dm-99
[17299.289150] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
transid 34 /dev/dm-100
[17310.978518] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1
transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0
[17310.993882] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled
Can anyone comment on this?
Also, df is reporting double the actual RAID1 volume size, and double
the amount of data stored in this filesystem:
# df -lh .
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 1.9T 51G 1.8T 3% /mnt/btrfs0
I would expect to see Size=1T, Used=25G
# strace -v -e trace=statfs df -lh /mnt/btrfs0
statfs("/mnt/btrfs0", {f_type=0x9123683e, f_bsize=4096,
f_blocks=488374272, f_bfree=475264720, f_bavail=474749786, f_files=0,
f_ffree=0, f_fsid={2083217090, -1714407264}, f_namelen=255,
f_frsize=4096}) = 0
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 1.9T 51G 1.8T 3% /mnt/btrfs0
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs"
in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:> > > I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data > on there. > > > After a reboot, I tried to mount it again > > # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0 > mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on > /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0, > missing codepage or helper program, or other error > In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try > dmesg | tail or soWith multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do this in the initrd (if you''ve installed its btrfs-progs package).> Then I did btrfsck - it reported no errors, but mounted OK: > > # btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0[...] The first thing that btrfsck does is to do a device scan. [...]> Can anyone comment on this?See above.> Also, df is reporting double the actual RAID1 volume size, and double > the amount of data stored in this filesystem: > > # df -lh . > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 1.9T 51G 1.8T 3% /mnt/btrfs0 > > I would expect to see Size=1T, Used=25G > > # strace -v -e trace=statfs df -lh /mnt/btrfs0 > statfs("/mnt/btrfs0", {f_type=0x9123683e, f_bsize=4096, > f_blocks=488374272, f_bfree=475264720, f_bavail=474749786, f_files=0, > f_ffree=0, f_fsid={2083217090, -1714407264}, f_namelen=255, > f_frsize=4096}) = 0 > Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on > /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 1.9T 51G 1.8T 3% /mnt/btrfs0This is an FAQ: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/FAQ#Why_is_free_space_so_complicated.3F tl;dr: It''s reporting the total number of raw storage bytes, because it''s impossible to compute actual usable space in the general case. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk == PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- In one respect at least, the Martians are a happy people: --- they have no lawyers.
On 19/08/12 14:15, Hugo Mills wrote:> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> >> >> I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data >> on there. >> >> >> After a reboot, I tried to mount it again >> >> # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0 >> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on >> /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0, >> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >> dmesg | tail or so > > With multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev > scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do > this in the initrd (if you''ve installed its btrfs-progs package). >I''m running Debian, I''ve just updated the system from squeeze to wheezy (with 3.2 kernel) so I could try btrfs and do other QA testing on wheezy (as it is in the beta phase now) I already had the btrfs-tools package installed, before creating the filesystem. So it appears Debian doesn''t have an init script It does have /lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules: SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end" ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="btrfs_end" ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end" RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs" RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}" LABEL="btrfs_end" but I''m guessing that isn''t any use to my logical volumes that are activated early in the boot sequence? Could I be having this problem because I put my btrfs on logical volumes? Here is the package version I have: # dpkg --list | grep btrfs ii btrfs-tools 0.19+20120328-7 Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilities Here is a more thorough dmesg, since boot, does this suggest the scan was invoked? I remember seeing some message about checking for btrfs filesystems just after selecting the kernel in grub (root is ext3) # dmesg | grep btrfs [ 40.677505] btrfs: setting nodatacow [ 40.677514] btrfs: turning off barriers [17216.145092] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1 transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 [17216.145639] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [17216.146987] btrfs: failed to read the system array on dm-100 [17216.147556] btrfs: open_ctree failed [17310.978518] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1 transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 [17310.993882] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [17598.736657] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1 transid 37 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 [17598.750849] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled>> Then I did btrfsck - it reported no errors, but mounted OK: >> >> # btrfsck /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 > [...] > > The first thing that btrfsck does is to do a device scan. > > [...]Ok, that is most likely why my next mount attempted succeeded -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:33:14PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote:> On 19/08/12 14:15, Hugo Mills wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: > >> I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data > >> on there. > >> > >> After a reboot, I tried to mount it again > >> > >> # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0 > >> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on > >> /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0, > >> missing codepage or helper program, or other error > >> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try > >> dmesg | tail or so > > > > With multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev > > scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do > > this in the initrd (if you''ve installed its btrfs-progs package). > > I''m running Debian, I''ve just updated the system from squeeze to wheezy > (with 3.2 kernel) so I could try btrfs and do other QA testing on wheezy > (as it is in the beta phase now) > > I already had the btrfs-tools package installed, before creating the > filesystem. So it appears Debian doesn''t have an init script > > It does have /lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules: > SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end" > ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="btrfs_end" > ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end" > RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs" > RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}" > > LABEL="btrfs_end" > > but I''m guessing that isn''t any use to my logical volumes that are > activated early in the boot sequence? > > Could I be having this problem because I put my btrfs on logical volumes?Possibly. You may need the "Device mapper uevents" option in the kernel (CONFIG_DM_UEVENT) to trigger that udev rule when you enable your VG(s). Not sure if it''s available/enabled in your kernel.> Here is the package version I have: > > # dpkg --list | grep btrfs > ii btrfs-tools 0.19+20120328-7 > Checksumming Copy on Write Filesystem utilitiesThat should be fine.> Here is a more thorough dmesg, since boot, does this suggest the scan > was invoked? I remember seeing some message about checking for btrfs > filesystems just after selecting the kernel in grub (root is ext3)That message was probably grub checking the FS.> # dmesg | grep btrfs > [ 40.677505] btrfs: setting nodatacow > [ 40.677514] btrfs: turning off barriers > [17216.145092] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1 > transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 > [17216.145639] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled > [17216.146987] btrfs: failed to read the system array on dm-100 > [17216.147556] btrfs: open_ctree failed > [17310.978518] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1 > transid 34 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 > [17310.993882] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled > [17598.736657] device fsid c959d4a5-0713-4685-b572-8a679ec37e20 devid 1 > transid 37 /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 > [17598.750849] btrfs: disk space caching is enabledNo, doesn''t look like there were any scan results coming in before 17216. Hugo. -- === Hugo Mills: hugo@... carfax.org.uk | darksatanic.net | lug.org.uk == PGP key: 515C238D from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net or http://www.carfax.org.uk --- In one respect at least, the Martians are a happy people: --- they have no lawyers.
On 19/08/12 16:51, Hugo Mills wrote:> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:33:14PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >> On 19/08/12 14:15, Hugo Mills wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>>> I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data >>>> on there. >>>> >>>> After a reboot, I tried to mount it again >>>> >>>> # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0 >>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on >>>> /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0, >>>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >>>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >>>> dmesg | tail or so >>> >>> With multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev >>> scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do >>> this in the initrd (if you''ve installed its btrfs-progs package). >> >> I''m running Debian, I''ve just updated the system from squeeze to wheezy >> (with 3.2 kernel) so I could try btrfs and do other QA testing on wheezy >> (as it is in the beta phase now) >> >> I already had the btrfs-tools package installed, before creating the >> filesystem. So it appears Debian doesn''t have an init script >> >> It does have /lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules: >> SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end" >> ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="btrfs_end" >> ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end" >> RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs" >> RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}" >> >> LABEL="btrfs_end" >> >> but I''m guessing that isn''t any use to my logical volumes that are >> activated early in the boot sequence? >> >> Could I be having this problem because I put my btrfs on logical volumes? > > Possibly. You may need the "Device mapper uevents" option in the > kernel (CONFIG_DM_UEVENT) to trigger that udev rule when you enable > your VG(s). Not sure if it''s available/enabled in your kernel. >I''ve created a Debian bug report for the issue: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685311 Thanks for the quick feedback about this -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On 19/08/12 18:02, Daniel Pocock wrote:> > > On 19/08/12 16:51, Hugo Mills wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:33:14PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> On 19/08/12 14:15, Hugo Mills wrote: >>>> On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 02:08:17PM +0000, Daniel Pocock wrote: >>>>> I created a 1TB RAID1. So far it is just for testing, no important data >>>>> on there. >>>>> >>>>> After a reboot, I tried to mount it again >>>>> >>>>> # mount /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0 /mnt/btrfs0 >>>>> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on >>>>> /dev/mapper/vg00-btrfsvol0_0, >>>>> missing codepage or helper program, or other error >>>>> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try >>>>> dmesg | tail or so >>>> >>>> With multi-volume btrfs filesystems, you have to run "btrfs dev >>>> scan" before trying to mount it. Usually, the distribution will do >>>> this in the initrd (if you''ve installed its btrfs-progs package). >>> >>> I''m running Debian, I''ve just updated the system from squeeze to wheezy >>> (with 3.2 kernel) so I could try btrfs and do other QA testing on wheezy >>> (as it is in the beta phase now) >>> >>> I already had the btrfs-tools package installed, before creating the >>> filesystem. So it appears Debian doesn''t have an init script >>> >>> It does have /lib/udev/rules.d/60-btrfs.rules: >>> SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_end" >>> ACTION!="add|change", GOTO="btrfs_end" >>> ENV{ID_FS_TYPE}!="btrfs", GOTO="btrfs_end" >>> RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs" >>> RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}" >>> >>> LABEL="btrfs_end" >>> >>> but I''m guessing that isn''t any use to my logical volumes that are >>> activated early in the boot sequence? >>> >>> Could I be having this problem because I put my btrfs on logical volumes? >> >> Possibly. You may need the "Device mapper uevents" option in the >> kernel (CONFIG_DM_UEVENT) to trigger that udev rule when you enable >> your VG(s). Not sure if it''s available/enabled in your kernel. >> > > I''ve created a Debian bug report for the issue: > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=685311 > > Thanks for the quick feedback about thisJust a quick update, the Debian bug report now includes a udev rule that makes the scan happen automatically, if anyone can suggest an even better way of doing this it would be really helpful: cat > /lib/udev/rules.d/99-btrfs.rules << EOF SUBSYSTEM!="block", GOTO="btrfs_lvm_end" ENV{DM_UUID}!="LVM-?*", GOTO="btrfs_lvm_end" RUN+="/sbin/modprobe btrfs" RUN+="/sbin/btrfs device scan $env{DEVNAME}" LABEL="btrfs_lvm_end" EOF -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Possibly Parallel Threads
- How to manage partitions and logical volumes with puppet?
- [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
- [PATCH] virtio-blk: emit udev event when device is resized
- upgrade leny-squeeze, xen3.2-xen4.0, what''s wrong?
- USB devices with same vendor:product id