http://cfis.savagexi.com/articles/2007/09/16/making-rails-better- actionview-needs-a-makeover I''ve been thinking and I''ve heard many other people voice the same concerns that Charlie Savage blogged about. If we could get a decent patch put together in the next couple weeks, is it too late for a major change like that for 2.0? Brandon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> http://cfis.savagexi.com/articles/2007/09/16/making-rails-better- > actionview-needs-a-makeover > > I''ve been thinking and I''ve heard many other people voice the same > concerns that Charlie Savage blogged about. > > If we could get a decent patch put together in the next couple weeks, > is it too late for a major change like that for 2.0?Sadly yes, we''re already pretty far down the path of a 2.0 RC however once we''ve branched for 2.0, there''s no reason this couldn''t start getting worked on in trunk. I don''t think there''s *anyone* who likes the current implementation of action view. -- Cheers Koz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
> http://cfis.savagexi.com/articles/2007/09/16/making-rails-better- > actionview-needs-a-makeover > > I''ve been thinking and I''ve heard many other people voice the same > concerns that Charlie Savage blogged about. > > If we could get a decent patch put together in the next couple weeks, > is it too late for a major change like that for 2.0?Sounds great. Yes, it''s too late for 2.0, but if it''s just a refactoring (no API changes), then it could make 2.1. Otherwise, it can be scheduled for 3.0. Rails 2.x is not going to be the last, ever release of the framework ;). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Sep 30, 2007, at 4:52 PM, DHH wrote:> >> http://cfis.savagexi.com/articles/2007/09/16/making-rails-better- >> actionview-needs-a-makeover >> >> I''ve been thinking and I''ve heard many other people voice the same >> concerns that Charlie Savage blogged about. >> >> If we could get a decent patch put together in the next couple weeks, >> is it too late for a major change like that for 2.0? > > Sounds great.I''m up for trying to tackle it if anyone wants to pitch in.> Yes, it''s too late for 2.0, but if it''s just a > refactoring (no API changes), then it could make 2.1.> Otherwise, it > can be scheduled for 3.0. Rails 2.x is not going to be the last, ever > release of the framework ;).Whew...that''s a relief. ;-) Brandon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:52:29 -0700, DHH wrote:> Otherwise, it > can be scheduled for 3.0. Rails 2.x is not going to be the last, ever > release of the framework ;).OMG! Did you hear? I just saw a post from DHH that says: "Rails 2.x is...going to be the last ever release of the framework"!! -- Jay Levitt | Boston, MA | My character doesn''t like it when they Faster: jay at jay dot fm | cry or shout or hit. http://www.jay.fm | - Kristoffer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 1-okt-2007, at 0:49, Jay Levitt wrote:> OMG! Did you hear? I just saw a post from DHH that says: > > "Rails 2.x is...going to be the last ever release of the framework"!!Yes partly because after 2.0 it will be rebranded as Pete''s Swanky Framework, will support continuations and bake cakes. -- Julian ''Julik'' Tarkhanov please send all personal mail to me at julik.nl --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Sep 30, 4:13 pm, Brandon Keepers <bkeep...@gmail.com> wrote:> I''m up for trying to tackle it if anyone wants to pitch in.Did you make any progress? Just wondering because I was going give it a try. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On Oct 23, 2007, at 11:42 AM, Josh Peek wrote:> On Sep 30, 4:13 pm, Brandon Keepers <bkeep...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I''m up for trying to tackle it if anyone wants to pitch in. > > Did you make any progress? Just wondering because I was going give it > a try.Not really. I''ve spent some time poking through the code and working through some higher level ideas, but nothing significant yet. You going to be at RubyConf? Maybe we could get some people together and hack it up. Brandon --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-core-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---