Hi! Is anyone working on implementing the appropriate WAI-ARIA roles, states and properties [1] in scriptaculous? [1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/aria-roadmap/ Regards, Peter Krantz --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
Pete a écrit :> Hi! > > Is anyone working on implementing the appropriate WAI-ARIA roles, > states and properties [1] in scriptaculous?How exactly does script.aculo.us relate? AFAIK, ARIA is entirely about proper markup in the elements, and is therefore the responsibility of the code (be it server-side or client-side) building this markup. Perhaps a couple tiny places in Scripty may append ARIA attributes to elements they add behavior to, but I feel it''s more of the developer''s responsibility, and should at the very least be a general boolean option in Scripty, if it does end up implementing its tiny part of it. -- Christophe Porteneuve aka TDD tdd-x+CfDp/qHev2eFz/2MeuCQ@public.gmane.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
On 11/19/07, Christophe Porteneuve <tdd-x+CfDp/qHev2eFz/2MeuCQ@public.gmane.org> wrote:> > How exactly does script.aculo.us relate? AFAIK, ARIA is entirely about > proper markup in the elements, and is therefore the responsibility of > the code (be it server-side or client-side) building this markup. >In practice it is about setting attribute values in the DOM with script (unless you are using XHTML 1.1 which isn''t practical with current browser demographics). Apparently the Dojo framework has implemented ARIA extensively with the help of IBM [1].> Perhaps a couple tiny places in Scripty may append ARIA attributes to > elements they add behavior to, but I feel it''s more of the developer''s > responsibility, and should at the very least be a general boolean option > in Scripty, if it does end up implementing its tiny part of it. >Maybe so. There are no drawbacks to specifying the correct ARIA attributes for e.g. a slider widget. [1]: http://www-03.ibm.com/able/resources/dojo.html Regards, Peter --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Spinoffs" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rubyonrails-spinoffs-unsubscribe-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFFw@public.gmane.org For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-spinoffs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---