thr3ads.net - Ocfs2 devel - [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc

If this information is useful, please help other people find it:
Share via:

Jeff Moyer

2012-Oct-30 20:14 UTC

[patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

This patch passes a data pointer along to the alloc_inode
super_operations function.  The value will initially be used by
bdev_alloc_inode to allocate the bdev_inode on the same numa
node as the device to which it is tied.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
---
 fs/afs/super.c         |    5 +++--
 fs/block_dev.c         |   17 +++++++++++++++--
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h       |    2 +-
 fs/btrfs/inode.c       |    3 ++-
 fs/cifs/cifsfs.c       |    2 +-
 fs/inode.c             |   10 +++++-----
 fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c |    3 ++-
 fs/ocfs2/super.c       |    5 +++--
 include/linux/fs.h     |    2 +-
 9 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/afs/super.c b/fs/afs/super.c
index 4316500..e242661 100644
--- a/fs/afs/super.c
+++ b/fs/afs/super.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ static void afs_i_init_once(void *foo);
 static struct dentry *afs_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
 		      int flags, const char *dev_name, void *data);
 static void afs_kill_super(struct super_block *sb);
-static struct inode *afs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb);
+static struct inode *afs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void *data);
 static void afs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode);
 static int afs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf);
 
@@ -470,7 +470,8 @@ static void afs_i_init_once(void *_vnode)
 /*
  * allocate an AFS inode struct from our slab cache
  */
-static struct inode *afs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+static struct inode *afs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb,
+				     void * __attribute__((unused))data)
 {
 	struct afs_vnode *vnode;
 
diff --git a/fs/block_dev.c b/fs/block_dev.c
index b3c1d3d..c366fb2 100644
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -454,9 +454,22 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_fsync);
 static  __cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SPINLOCK(bdev_lock);
 static struct kmem_cache * bdev_cachep __read_mostly;
 
-static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void *data)
 {
-	struct bdev_inode *ei = kmem_cache_alloc(bdev_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
+	struct bdev_inode *ei;
+	int partno;
+	int node;
+
+	if (data) {
+		struct gendisk *disk;
+		dev_t dev = *(dev_t *)data;
+		disk = get_gendisk(dev, &partno);
+		node = disk->node_id;
+		put_disk(disk);
+	} else
+		node = -1;
+	
+	ei = kmem_cache_alloc_node(bdev_cachep, GFP_KERNEL, node);
 	if (!ei)
 		return NULL;
 
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
index 926c9ff..0736131 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -3324,7 +3324,7 @@ int btrfs_readpage(struct file *file, struct page *page);
 void btrfs_evict_inode(struct inode *inode);
 int btrfs_write_inode(struct inode *inode, struct writeback_control *wbc);
 int btrfs_dirty_inode(struct inode *inode);
-struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb);
+struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void *data);
 void btrfs_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode);
 int btrfs_drop_inode(struct inode *inode);
 int btrfs_init_cachep(void);
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/inode.c b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
index 85a1e50..d4b42d0 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -7057,7 +7057,8 @@ int btrfs_create_subvol_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle
*trans,
 	return err;
 }
 
-struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+struct inode *btrfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb,
+				void * __attribute__((unused))data)
 {
 	struct btrfs_inode *ei;
 	struct inode *inode;
diff --git a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
index e7931cc..2e67ed7 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/cifsfs.c
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ mempool_t *cifs_req_poolp;
 mempool_t *cifs_mid_poolp;
 
 static struct inode *
-cifs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+cifs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void * __attribute__((unused)) data)
 {
 	struct cifsInodeInfo *cifs_inode;
 	cifs_inode = kmem_cache_alloc(cifs_inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
diff --git a/fs/inode.c b/fs/inode.c
index b03c719..bb7e273 100644
--- a/fs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/inode.c
@@ -199,12 +199,12 @@ out:
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(inode_init_always);
 
-static struct inode *alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+static struct inode *alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void *data)
 {
 	struct inode *inode;
 
 	if (sb->s_op->alloc_inode)
-		inode = sb->s_op->alloc_inode(sb);
+		inode = sb->s_op->alloc_inode(sb, data);
 	else
 		inode = kmem_cache_alloc(inode_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
 
@@ -892,7 +892,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_next_ino);
  */
 struct inode *new_inode_pseudo(struct super_block *sb)
 {
-	struct inode *inode = alloc_inode(sb);
+	struct inode *inode = alloc_inode(sb, NULL);
 
 	if (inode) {
 		spin_lock(&inode->i_lock);
@@ -1004,7 +1004,7 @@ struct inode *iget5_locked(struct super_block *sb,
unsigned long hashval,
 		return inode;
 	}
 
-	inode = alloc_inode(sb);
+	inode = alloc_inode(sb, data);
 	if (inode) {
 		struct inode *old;
 
@@ -1073,7 +1073,7 @@ struct inode *iget_locked(struct super_block *sb, unsigned
long ino)
 		return inode;
 	}
 
-	inode = alloc_inode(sb);
+	inode = alloc_inode(sb, NULL);
 	if (inode) {
 		struct inode *old;
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c b/fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c
index 16b712d..a322984 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmfs/dlmfs.c
@@ -340,7 +340,8 @@ static void dlmfs_init_once(void *foo)
 	inode_init_once(&ip->ip_vfs_inode);
 }
 
-static struct inode *dlmfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+static struct inode *dlmfs_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb,
+				       void *__attribute__((unused)) data)
 {
 	struct dlmfs_inode_private *ip;
 
diff --git a/fs/ocfs2/super.c b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
index 0e91ec2..ada4a81 100644
--- a/fs/ocfs2/super.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/super.c
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static int ocfs2_get_sector(struct super_block *sb,
 			    struct buffer_head **bh,
 			    int block,
 			    int sect_size);
-static struct inode *ocfs2_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb);
+static struct inode *ocfs2_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void *data);
 static void ocfs2_destroy_inode(struct inode *inode);
 static int ocfs2_susp_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb, int unsuspend);
 static int ocfs2_enable_quotas(struct ocfs2_super *osb);
@@ -554,7 +554,8 @@ static void ocfs2_release_system_inodes(struct ocfs2_super
*osb)
 }
 
 /* We''re allocating fs objects, use GFP_NOFS */
-static struct inode *ocfs2_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
+static struct inode *ocfs2_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb,
+				       void *__attribute__((unused))data)
 {
 	struct ocfs2_inode_info *oi;
 
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index b33cfc9..240b298 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1595,7 +1595,7 @@ extern ssize_t vfs_writev(struct file *, const struct
iovec __user *,
 		unsigned long, loff_t *);
 
 struct super_operations {
-   	struct inode *(*alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb);
+   	struct inode *(*alloc_inode)(struct super_block *sb, void *data);
 	void (*destroy_inode)(struct inode *);
 
    	void (*dirty_inode) (struct inode *, int flags);
-- 
1.7.1

Al Viro

2012-Oct-30 20:51 UTC

head link

Re: [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:14:39PM -0400, Jeff Moyer
wrote:> This patch passes a data pointer along to the alloc_inode
> super_operations function.  The value will initially be used by
> bdev_alloc_inode to allocate the bdev_inode on the same numa
> node as the device to which it is tied.
Yecchhh...
> -static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> +static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void *data)
>  {
> -	struct bdev_inode *ei = kmem_cache_alloc(bdev_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	struct bdev_inode *ei;
> +	int partno;
> +	int node;
> +
> +	if (data) {
> +		struct gendisk *disk;
> +		dev_t dev = *(dev_t *)data;
> +		disk = get_gendisk(dev, &partno);
> +		node = disk->node_id;
> +		put_disk(disk);
Oh, _lovely_.  Such a stunningly elegant idea.  And why not pass the
sodding node_id directly, if I may ask?

[reads further]
[finds completely undocumented reason for that]

Take that crap out and don''t bring it back.  And consider this kludge
NAKed
once and forever.  It''s unspeakably ugly, even if it didn''t
break just about
every fs out there (you do realize that almost all of them have
->alloc_inode(),
don''t you?  Use grep and see).

Al Viro

2012-Oct-30 21:17 UTC

head link

Re: [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:51:42PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:14:39PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
> > This patch passes a data pointer along to the alloc_inode
> > super_operations function.  The value will initially be used by
> > bdev_alloc_inode to allocate the bdev_inode on the same numa
> > node as the device to which it is tied.
> 
> Yecchhh...
> 
> > -static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
> > +static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb, void
*data)
> >  {
> > -	struct bdev_inode *ei = kmem_cache_alloc(bdev_cachep, GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	struct bdev_inode *ei;
> > +	int partno;
> > +	int node;
> > +
> > +	if (data) {
> > +		struct gendisk *disk;
> > +		dev_t dev = *(dev_t *)data;
> > +		disk = get_gendisk(dev, &partno);
> > +		node = disk->node_id;
BTW, speaking of other reasons this is FUBAR - mknod a block device node
for something that doesn''t exist and try to open it.  struct
block_device
lifetime is not limited to that of struct gendisk; it can be allocated
before gendisk is there.  Moreover, with static /dev and demand-loaded
modules this will be the normal scenario.

IOW, this is completely misguided.

Jeff Moyer

2012-Oct-31 13:22 UTC

head link

Re: [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 08:51:42PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 04:14:39PM -0400, Jeff Moyer wrote:
>> > This patch passes a data pointer along to the alloc_inode
>> > super_operations function.  The value will initially be used by
>> > bdev_alloc_inode to allocate the bdev_inode on the same numa
>> > node as the device to which it is tied.
>> 
>> Yecchhh...
>> 
>> > -static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb)
>> > +static struct inode *bdev_alloc_inode(struct super_block *sb,
void *data)
>> >  {
>> > -	struct bdev_inode *ei = kmem_cache_alloc(bdev_cachep,
GFP_KERNEL);
>> > +	struct bdev_inode *ei;
>> > +	int partno;
>> > +	int node;
>> > +
>> > +	if (data) {
>> > +		struct gendisk *disk;
>> > +		dev_t dev = *(dev_t *)data;
>> > +		disk = get_gendisk(dev, &partno);
>> > +		node = disk->node_id;
>
> Oh, _lovely_.  Such a stunningly elegant idea.  And why not pass the
> sodding node_id directly, if I may ask?
struct block_device *bdget(dev_t dev)
{
...
        inode = iget5_locked(blockdev_superblock, hash(dev),
                        bdev_test, bdev_set, &dev);

The device is used by bdev_test and bdev_set.
> Take that crap out and don''t bring it back.  And consider this
kludge NAKed
> once and forever.  It''s unspeakably ugly, even if it
didn''t break just about
> every fs out there (you do realize that almost all of them have
->alloc_inode(),
> pdon''t you?  Use grep and see).
Oof.  I was using cscope and it didn''t show all callers.
> BTW, speaking of other reasons this is FUBAR - mknod a block device node
> for something that doesn''t exist and try to open it.  struct
block_device
> lifetime is not limited to that of struct gendisk; it can be allocated
> before gendisk is there.  Moreover, with static /dev and demand-loaded
> modules this will be the normal scenario.
>
> IOW, this is completely misguided.
OK, thanks for the review, Al, it''s greatly appreciated.  Do you have a
suggestion on how I might achieve this in a way that would be
acceptable?  I''m not too fond of the idea of reallocating the inode
when
the device does appear.  I''ll give it some more thought.

Again, thanks for taking a look.

Cheers,
Jeff

Ocfs2 devel - Oct 2012 - [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

[patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

Re: [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

Re: [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation

Re: [patch 05/10] vfs: pass data to alloc_inode super operation