2.4.x is a stable version and 3.0 is a development version then what about 2.5.x version ? ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
Adrian Mak escribió:> 2.4.x is a stable version and 3.0 is a development version > then what about 2.5.x version ?2.5 changed name to 3.0 because we liked to do that :-) -- Cristian Rodriguez R. perl -e ''$_=pack(c5,0105,0107,0123,0132,(1<<3)+2);y[A-Z][N-ZA-M];print;''
On Saturday 29 October 2005 19:40, Adrian Mak wrote:> 2.4.x is a stable version and 3.0 is a development version > then what about 2.5.x version ?The 2.5 series was the Development release up until the Beta for 3.0 started. Once 3.0 final is released, 3.0 will be the stable version and 3.1 will become the new development version. -Tom -- Tom Eastep \ Nothing is foolproof to a sufficiently talented fool Shoreline, \ http://shorewall.net Washington USA \ teastep@shorewall.net PGP Public Key \ https://lists.shorewall.net/teastep.pgp.key
Tom Eastep wrote:> On Saturday 29 October 2005 19:40, Adrian Mak wrote: >>2.4.x is a stable version and 3.0 is a development version >>then what about 2.5.x version ? > > The 2.5 series was the Development release up until the Beta for 3.0 started. > Once 3.0 final is released, 3.0 will be the stable version and 3.1 will > become the new development version.And here i was thinking that following the Linux kernel version numbering method would clear up any questions like this... ;-( Paul ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today * Register for a JBoss Training Course Free Certification Exam for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005 Visit http://www.jboss.com/services/certification for more information
On Mon, 2005-10-31 at 13:03 +1000, Paul Gear wrote:> Tom Eastep wrote: > > On Saturday 29 October 2005 19:40, Adrian Mak wrote: > >>2.4.x is a stable version and 3.0 is a development version > >>then what about 2.5.x version ? > > > > The 2.5 series was the Development release up until the Beta for 3.0 started. > > Once 3.0 final is released, 3.0 will be the stable version and 3.1 will > > become the new development version. > > And here i was thinking that following the Linux kernel version > numbering method would clear up any questions like this... ;-(Oh, it does. And personally, I really like this numbering method. :) The only issue is, the original poster failed to realize there is no 3.0 yet and ignored the RC bit. There is a 3.0.0 RC2 though. Release candidates are just this -- candidates, not yet released. Paul, please don''t take this question as a sign. There always where and always will be questions like this, no matter what. The current numbering scheme is fine, easy to grok and widely used. karsten -- Davision - Atelier fuer Gestaltung / Internet / Multimedia UNIX / Linux Netzwerke und Schulungen Telefon +49 6151 273859 Fax +49 6151 273862