flight 16982 linux-linus real [real]
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16982/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-pair 8 xen-boot/dst_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-amd64-pair 7 xen-boot/src_host fail REGR. vs. 12557
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-win 5 xen-boot fail like 12557
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd 7 redhat-install fail blocked in 12557
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu 15 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win-vcpus1 5 xen-boot fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 13 guest-stop fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win 16 leak-check/check fail never pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win 13 guest-stop fail never pass
version targeted for testing:
linux a7c1120d2dcc83691bafa034d98f70285757e826
baseline version:
linux c16fa4f2ad19908a47c63d8fa436a1178438c7e7
------------------------------------------------------------
People who touched revisions under test:
------------------------------------------------------------
jobs:
build-amd64 pass
build-armhf pass
build-i386 pass
build-amd64-pvops pass
build-i386-pvops pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl fail
test-amd64-i386-xl fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-amd fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-amd pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win7-amd64 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-credit2 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-pcipt-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel fail
test-amd64-i386-qemuu-rhel6hvm-intel pass
test-amd64-i386-xl-multivcpu fail
test-amd64-amd64-pair fail
test-amd64-i386-pair fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf-pin fail
test-amd64-amd64-pv fail
test-amd64-i386-pv pass
test-amd64-amd64-xl-sedf fail
test-amd64-i386-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-win-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemut-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-i386-xl-winxpsp3-vcpus1 fail
test-amd64-amd64-win fail
test-amd64-i386-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-qemut-win fail
test-amd64-i386-qemut-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-win fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-i386-xend-winxpsp3 fail
test-amd64-amd64-xl-winxpsp3 fail
------------------------------------------------------------
sg-report-flight on woking.cam.xci-test.com
logs: /home/xc_osstest/logs
images: /home/xc_osstest/images
Logs, config files, etc. are available at
http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs
Test harness code can be found at
http://xenbits.xensource.com/gitweb?p=osstest.git;a=summary
Not pushing.
------------------------------------------------------------
commit a7c1120d2dcc83691bafa034d98f70285757e826
Merge: 6ec40b4... 9b2ff35...
Author: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Sat Mar 2 19:33:21 2013 -0800
Merge tag ''ext4_for_linus'' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4
Pull ext4 bug fixes from Ted Ts''o:
"Various bug fixes for ext4. The most important is a fix for the new
extent cache''s slab shrinker which can cause significant,
user-visible
pauses when the system is under memory pressure."
* tag ''ext4_for_linus'' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tytso/ext4:
ext4: enable quotas before orphan cleanup
ext4: don''t allow quota mount options when quota feature enabled
ext4: fix a warning from sparse check for ext4_dir_llseek
ext4: convert number of blocks to clusters properly
ext4: fix possible memory leak in ext4_remount()
jbd2: fix ERR_PTR dereference in jbd2__journal_start
ext4: use percpu counter for extent cache count
ext4: optimize ext4_es_shrink()
Ian Jackson
2013-Mar-04 17:23 UTC
Re: [linux-linus test] 16982: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]
xen.org writes ("[linux-linus test] 16982: regressions -
FAIL"):> flight 16982 linux-linus real [real]
> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16982/
>
> Regressions :-(
>
> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
> including tests which could not be run:
> test-amd64-i386-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557
So looking at this one, the guest got this far:
[ 0.939337] NX-protecting the kernel data: 3500k
Loading, please wait...
mount: mounting none on /dev failed: No such device
W: devtmpfs not available, falling back to tmpfs for /dev
And then it stopped until the debug output collection started.
Is this likely to be an incompatibility between this kernel and the
initramfs I''m using ?
> test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557
This seems to be the host not finding its network driver because of
this:
Mar 3 14:21:04.141787 [ 29.101851] bnx2: Can''t load firmware file
"bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
Mar 3 14:21:04.214205 [ 29.112678] bnx2: Can''t load firmware file
"bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"
This problem is coming back to me now: it''s because newer kernels need
newer firmware files, and the test system currently has no way to
download a newer firmware. This was discussed here the last time I
tried these Linux upstream tests and an approach was suggested. So I
turned the tests off but I got distracted before I could implement the
change.
I''m going to turn the tests off again but this time I will make a
better note of what needs doing.
Ian.
Sander Eikelenboom
2013-Mar-04 18:03 UTC
Re: [linux-linus test] 16982: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]
Hi Ian, I was seeing this as well, but it turned out the be a problem with AHCI not working (because of a linux change to enable multiple MSI per device, which is not supported by Xen) A fix for that was in Konrad''s latest pull request which is upstream in Linus his tree now. -- Sander Monday, March 4, 2013, 6:23:10 PM, you wrote:> xen.org writes ("[linux-linus test] 16982: regressions - FAIL"): >> flight 16982 linux-linus real [real] >> http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~xensrcts/logs/16982/ >> >> Regressions :-( >> >> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, >> including tests which could not be run: >> test-amd64-i386-xl 9 guest-start fail REGR. vs. 12557> So looking at this one, the guest got this far:> [ 0.939337] NX-protecting the kernel data: 3500k > Loading, please wait... > mount: mounting none on /dev failed: No such device > W: devtmpfs not available, falling back to tmpfs for /dev> And then it stopped until the debug output collection started.> Is this likely to be an incompatibility between this kernel and the > initramfs I''m using ?>> test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557> This seems to be the host not finding its network driver because of > this:> Mar 3 14:21:04.141787 [ 29.101851] bnx2: Can''t load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw" > Mar 3 14:21:04.214205 [ 29.112678] bnx2: Can''t load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw"> This problem is coming back to me now: it''s because newer kernels need > newer firmware files, and the test system currently has no way to > download a newer firmware. This was discussed here the last time I > tried these Linux upstream tests and an approach was suggested. So I > turned the tests off but I got distracted before I could implement the > change.> I''m going to turn the tests off again but this time I will make a > better note of what needs doing.> Ian.
Pasi Kärkkäinen
2013-Mar-04 18:25 UTC
Re: [linux-linus test] 16982: regressions - FAIL [and 1 more messages]
On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 05:23:10PM +0000, Ian Jackson wrote:> > > test-amd64-amd64-pv 5 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 12557 > > This seems to be the host not finding its network driver because of > this: > > Mar 3 14:21:04.141787 [ 29.101851] bnx2: Can''t load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw" > Mar 3 14:21:04.214205 [ 29.112678] bnx2: Can''t load firmware file "bnx2/bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw" > > This problem is coming back to me now: it''s because newer kernels need > newer firmware files, and the test system currently has no way to > download a newer firmware. This was discussed here the last time I > tried these Linux upstream tests and an approach was suggested. So I > turned the tests off but I got distracted before I could implement the > change. > > I''m going to turn the tests off again but this time I will make a > better note of what needs doing. >I noticed this firmware problem aswell with the CentOS 6.x Xen rpms, where Linux 3.4 is used as a dom0 kernel. The problem was actually a wrong firmware filename (?) in the upstream kernel, so a simple symlink fixed the problem for me: cd /lib/firmware/bnx2 && ln -s bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1a.fw bnx2-mips-09-6.2.1b.fw -- Pasi