One of the requests from the xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. There''s a description here: https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-implement-block-device-resize I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment? -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:52 +0000, George Dunlap wrote:> One of the requests from the xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a > moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. > There''s a description here: > > https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-implement-block-device-resize > > > I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment?Doesn''t that already work? I thought this was patch in the PV block drivers ages ago... Yes, http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XenParavirtOps lists it under 2.6.36. Maybe this is a missing feature of (lib)xl vs xend? Ian.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>wrote:> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:52 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > One of the requests from the xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a > > moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. > > There''s a description here: > > > > > https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-implement-block-device-resize > > > > > > I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment? > > Doesn''t that already work? I thought this was patch in the PV block > drivers ages ago... > > Yes, http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XenParavirtOps lists it under 2.6.36. > > Maybe this is a missing feature of (lib)xl vs xend? >"xm help" doesn''t show a "block-resize" command, nor does grepping through tools for "resize" turn up anything. Would someone be willing to do some investigation into whether such a command is implemented in the protocol, and what it would take to get a "xm block-resize" command working? (Not necessarily do it, but have an idea what probably needs to be done.) -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
>>> On 18.12.12 at 15:06, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>wrote: > >> On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:52 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: >> > One of the requests from the xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a >> > moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. >> > There''s a description here: >> > >> > >> > https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-i > mplement-block-device-resize >> > >> > >> > I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment? >> >> Doesn''t that already work? I thought this was patch in the PV block >> drivers ages ago... >> >> Yes, http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XenParavirtOps lists it under 2.6.36. >> >> Maybe this is a missing feature of (lib)xl vs xend? >> > > "xm help" doesn''t show a "block-resize" command, nor does grepping through > tools for "resize" turn up anything. > > Would someone be willing to do some investigation into whether such a > command is implemented in the protocol, and what it would take to get a "xm > block-resize" command working? (Not necessarily do it, but have an idea > what probably needs to be done.)Have a look at http://xenbits.xen.org/hg/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg/rev/f7f420bd7b7a - I don''t think there is a strict need for xm/xl commands, except as a courtesy. Jan
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:06:56PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote:> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>wrote: > > > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:52 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > > One of the requests from the xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a > > > moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. > > > There''s a description here: > > > > > > > > https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-implement-block-device-resize > > > > > > > > > I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment? > > > > Doesn''t that already work? I thought this was patch in the PV block > > drivers ages ago... > > > > Yes, http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XenParavirtOps lists it under 2.6.36. > > > > Maybe this is a missing feature of (lib)xl vs xend? > > > > "xm help" doesn''t show a "block-resize" command, nor does grepping through > tools for "resize" turn up anything. > > Would someone be willing to do some investigation into whether such a > command is implemented in the protocol, and what it would take to get a "xm > block-resize" command working? (Not necessarily do it, but have an idea > what probably needs to be done.)Looking at the history it looks to be: 1fa73be6be65028a7543bba8f14474b42e064a1b which is commit 1fa73be6be65028a7543bba8f14474b42e064a1b Author: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com> Date: Thu Mar 11 13:42:26 2010 -0800 xen/front: Propagate changed size of VBDs Support dynamic resizing of virtual block devices. This patch supports both file backed block devices as well as physical devices that can be dynamically resized on the host side. Signed-off-by: K. Y. Srinivasan <ksrinivasan@novell.com> Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@citrix.com> diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c index 60006b7..f47b096 100644 --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c @@ -930,9 +930,24 @@ static void blkfront_connect(struct blkfront_info *info) unsigned int binfo; int err; - if ((info->connected == BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED) || - (info->connected == BLKIF_STATE_SUSPENDED) ) + switch (info->connected) { + case BLKIF_STATE_CONNECTED: + /* + * Potentially, the back-end may be signalling + * a capacity change; update the capacity. + */ + err = xenbus_scanf(XBT_NIL, info->xbdev->otherend, + "sectors", "%Lu", §ors); + if (XENBUS_EXIST_ERR(err)) + return; + printk(KERN_INFO "Setting capacity to %Lu\n", + sectors); + set_capacity(info->gd, sectors); + + /* fall through */ + case BLKIF_STATE_SUSPENDED: return; + } dev_dbg(&info->xbdev->dev, "%s:%s.\n", __func__, info->xbdev->otherend); So it should be altering the ''sectors'' value and just writting the backend state from XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateConnected.
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 14:37 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:> > So it should be altering the ''sectors'' value and just writting > the backend state from XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateConnected.I wonder if anyone fancies patching xen/include/public/io/blkif.h to say so. Ian.
>>> On 18.12.12 at 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: > So it should be altering the ''sectors'' value and just writting > the backend state from XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateConnected.Which is what the corresponding backend patch does (which for upstream was separate because I think blkback wasn''t upstream yet back when KY did that work). Jan
Oops, somehow forgot to cc the list here... On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:13 PM, George Dunlap <George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com>wrote:> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 2:06 PM, George Dunlap < > George.Dunlap@eu.citrix.com> wrote: > >> "xm help" doesn''t show a "block-resize" command, nor does grepping >> through tools for "resize" turn up anything. >> > > According to the guy who submitted the patch that was accepted into > 2.6.36: "My goal was to not have the end-user do anything other than what > was minimally required to resizing the device on the host side. Once the > device is resized on the host side, this capacity change is propagated to > the guest without having to invoke any xm command." > > So in theory this should already work. > > I''ve asked the guy who submitted the request to test it. > > -George >_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 14:51 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:> >>> On 18.12.12 at 15:37, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> wrote: > > So it should be altering the ''sectors'' value and just writting > > the backend state from XenbusStateConnected to XenbusStateConnected. > > Which is what the corresponding backend patch does (which for > upstream was separate because I think blkback wasn''t upstream > yet back when KY did that work).Looks like this was upstream, in the first version of the patch from the looks of things. I suspect it wasn''t usable until 496b318eb655 which fixed a xenbus hang on the second resize but that was in v3.0-rc1 so it ought to be ok... Ian.
On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 02:06:56PM +0000, George Dunlap wrote:> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Ian Campbell <[1]Ian.Campbell@citrix.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-12-18 at 13:52 +0000, George Dunlap wrote: > > One of the requests from the [2]xenorg.uservoice.com page that had a > > moderate amount of interest was to allow block devices to be resized. > > There''s a description here: > > > > > [3]https://xenorg.uservoice.com/forums/172169-xen-development/suggestions/3140313-implement-block-device-resize > > > > > > I have no idea what this would take -- can anyone comment? > > Doesn''t that already work? I thought this was patch in the PV block > drivers ages ago... > > Yes, [4]http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/XenParavirtOps lists it under 2.6.36. > > Maybe this is a missing feature of (lib)xl vs xend? > > "xm help" doesn''t show a "block-resize" command, nor does grepping through > tools for "resize" turn up anything. > > Would someone be willing to do some investigation into whether such a > command is implemented in the protocol, and what it would take to get a > "xm block-resize" command working? (Not necessarily do it, but have an > idea what probably needs to be done.) >Resizing is supported automatically if running new enough blkback and blkfront! Resize the backing LVM volume in dom0 and the domU will notice the disk has been resized. There has been discussion (and patches) on xen-devel a couple of years ago. -- Pasi