Xen devel - Jan 2012 - Re: missing libxl patches

Christoph Egger writes ("missing libxl
patches"):
> any reason to not apply all patches from Roger
> (http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-12/msg01380.html) ?
I think we''re still having a conversation about how scripts should be
run, which is tied up with the BSD xenbackendd stuff.

Some of Roger''s patches could probably be applied anyway but I
haven''t
had time yet to decide exactly which.
> libxl fails to build for me because PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP
> is not available on NetBSD.
Urgh, now you''ve drawn my attention to this I''ve just read
that patch.
How unpleasant.  I think we should break that into its own function.

Ian.

2012/1/6 Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>:
> Christoph Egger writes ("missing libxl patches"):
>> any reason to not apply all patches from Roger
>> (http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-12/msg01380.html) ?
>
> I think we're still having a conversation about how scripts should be
> run, which is tied up with the BSD xenbackendd stuff.
>
> Some of Roger's patches could probably be applied anyway but I
haven't
> had time yet to decide exactly which.
>
>> libxl fails to build for me because PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP
>> is not available on NetBSD.
>
> Urgh, now you've drawn my attention to this I've just read that
patch.
> How unpleasant.  I think we should break that into its own function.
I'm going to break the mutex initialization to a separate function and
submit this patch on it's own, since it doesn't have anything to do
with hotplug scripts.
> Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: missing libxl
patches"):
> I''m going to break the mutex initialization to a separate function
and
> submit this patch on it''s own, since it doesn''t have
anything to do
> with hotplug scripts.
Excellent, yes, please do.

Ian.