Christoph Egger writes ("missing libxl
patches"):> any reason to not apply all patches from Roger
> (lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-12/msg01380.html) ?
I think we''re still having a conversation about how scripts should be
run, which is tied up with the BSD xenbackendd stuff.
Some of Roger''s patches could probably be applied anyway but I
haven''t
had time yet to decide exactly which.
> libxl fails to build for me because PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP
> is not available on NetBSD.
Urgh, now you''ve drawn my attention to this I''ve just read
that patch.
How unpleasant. I think we should break that into its own function.
Ian.
2012/1/6 Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com>:> Christoph Egger writes ("missing libxl patches"): >> any reason to not apply all patches from Roger >> (lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2011-12/msg01380.html) ? > > I think we're still having a conversation about how scripts should be > run, which is tied up with the BSD xenbackendd stuff. > > Some of Roger's patches could probably be applied anyway but I haven't > had time yet to decide exactly which. > >> libxl fails to build for me because PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_INITIALIZER_NP >> is not available on NetBSD. > > Urgh, now you've drawn my attention to this I've just read that patch. > How unpleasant. I think we should break that into its own function.I'm going to break the mutex initialization to a separate function and submit this patch on it's own, since it doesn't have anything to do with hotplug scripts.> Ian._______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xensource.com lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
Roger Pau Monné writes ("Re: missing libxl
patches"):> I''m going to break the mutex initialization to a separate function
and
> submit this patch on it''s own, since it doesn''t have
anything to do
> with hotplug scripts.
Excellent, yes, please do.
Ian.