Yes, that is what I have noticed too. Could RedHat touch on this a little bit.
I would like to know some underlying reasons. I had regular RedHat Apche
running for a few virtual servers. I just installed SWS last week for very
rare use of secure connection. The virtual servers I have on SWS are not using
any secure connection but they are running noticeably slower than before.
"Joe Pearson" <joe@webdms.com> wrote:
I have noticed that Red Hats SWS runs slower than Stronghold. I''ve got
SCO/Stronghold running on a P133 and Redhat SWS running on a PIII 500 and
Stronghold''s Secure connections run much faster. When I get some time,
I
want to put Stronghold on Redhat and run some test, but for now I have no
idea why SWS is slower.
--------------------------------------
Joe Pearson
Database Management Services, Ltd. Co.
208-384-1311 ext 11
http://www.webdms.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin U. <kevung@usa.net>
To: redhat-secure-server@redhat.com <redhat-secure-server@redhat.com>
Date: Tuesday, January 04, 2000 9:38 PM
Subject: Performance?
I was just wondering if anyone has noticed any big difference in performance
between running just regular RedHat6.1 Apache1.3.9 server and running SWS3.1
Redhat Apache. (I mean if most of the virtual servers on the box are NOT
using
secure connection)
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=3D1
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-secure-server-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
--
PLEASE read the Red Hat FAQ, Tips, Errata and the MAILING LIST ARCHIVES!
http://www.redhat.com http://archive.redhat.com
To unsubscribe: mail redhat-secure-server-request@redhat.com with
"unsubscribe" as the Subject.
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.amexmail.com/?A=3D1