Hi all, I''m setting up a buzzword-compliant auto-scaling thing on EC2, and I have something I''d like some more opinion on. Namely, I am going to be making my own AMI (getting the app set up takes ~20 mins otherwise), and it seems perfectly workable to store the entire config in /etc/puppet and just running puppet on the manifest--no puppetd, no puppetmaster, just a git pull to get any recent changes and run once at boot. This works fine, of course, but I lose the ability to push changes to the nodes without touching them manually. I''m wondering if anyone else has run this sort of setup, and if so, if you preferred it or came to regret it? Thanks, Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Akins, Brian
2010-Mar-16 21:32 UTC
Re: [Puppet Users] Running on EC2 without a puppetmaster?
On 3/16/10 2:42 PM, "Ben Lavender" <blavender@gmail.com> wrote:> I''m wondering if anyone else has run this sort of setup, and if so, if > you preferred it or came to regret it?We are doing something similar. We have a "wrapper" script that tries to rsync down the latest version of /etc/puppet, then runs puppet in a loop until it exits 0 or runs 10 times. So far, so good. -- Brian Akins -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.