Hi everybody, I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and mongrel. I don''t understand what are the benefits of each solution. Do you have a part of the answer please? Regards. Grifith -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Smain Kahlouch <smainklh@gmail.com> wrote:> Hi everybody, > > I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and > mongrel. > I don''t understand what are the benefits of each solution. > > Do you have a part of the answer please?We seem to be directing folks to passenger if they are running a new enough Puppet in the docs, yet this seems to conflict: http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/msg04745.html (any updates on this?) I agree with the need to choose one performant "default suggestion" and not leave someone with the task of evaluating/testing lots of options. --Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Mongrel was very easy to setup as the packages are all available in Fedora. I was able to fire up a puppetmaster on most of the cpu cores I have on my system to scale the load out a bit more. I have yet to try passenger. But I think more importantly what is the "fastest" and most "scalable" solution. I have heard/read that Mongrel (and older ruby) have had memory leaks, but not sure if thats still true today on current versions. -Chris On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Michael DeHaan <michael@reductivelabs.com>wrote:> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Smain Kahlouch <smainklh@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > > > I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and > > mongrel. > > I don''t understand what are the benefits of each solution. > > > > Do you have a part of the answer please? > > We seem to be directing folks to passenger if they are running a new > enough Puppet in the docs, yet this seems to conflict: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/msg04745.html > (any updates on this?) > > I agree with the need to choose one performant "default suggestion" > and not leave someone with the task of evaluating/testing lots of > options. > > --Michael > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Passenger should be about 30% faster and has built-in memory management via mod-rack. This is a huge plus if you have a lot of nodes or limited memory. Also, you stop having problems with Apache getting out of sync with the puppetmaster if you restart the puppetmaster processes without also restarting Apache. Trevor On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Christopher Johnston <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote:> Mongrel was very easy to setup as the packages are all available in Fedora. > I was able to fire up a puppetmaster on most of the cpu cores I have on my > system to scale the load out a bit more. I have yet to try passenger. But I > think more importantly what is the "fastest" and most "scalable" solution. > I have heard/read that Mongrel (and older ruby) have had memory leaks, but > not sure if thats still true today on current versions. > -Chris > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Michael DeHaan <michael@reductivelabs.com> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Smain Kahlouch <smainklh@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > Hi everybody, >> > >> > I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and >> > mongrel. >> > I don''t understand what are the benefits of each solution. >> > >> > Do you have a part of the answer please? >> >> We seem to be directing folks to passenger if they are running a new >> enough Puppet in the docs, yet this seems to conflict: >> >> http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/msg04745.html >> (any updates on this?) >> >> I agree with the need to choose one performant "default suggestion" >> and not leave someone with the task of evaluating/testing lots of >> options. >> >> --Michael >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Puppet Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >-- Trevor Vaughan Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc (410) 541-6699 tvaughan@onyxpoint.com -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Trevor Vaughan <tvaughan@onyxpoint.com> wrote:> Passenger should be about 30% faster and has built-in memory > management via mod-rack. > > This is a huge plus if you have a lot of nodes or limited memory. > > Also, you stop having problems with Apache getting out of sync with > the puppetmaster if you restart the puppetmaster processes without > also restarting Apache.++ I found it incredibly difficult to write robust babysitter processes for anything + multiple mongrels. It''s much simpler to manage apache with passenger.> > Trevor > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Christopher Johnston > <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote: >> Mongrel was very easy to setup as the packages are all available in Fedora. >> I was able to fire up a puppetmaster on most of the cpu cores I have on my >> system to scale the load out a bit more. I have yet to try passenger. But I >> think more importantly what is the "fastest" and most "scalable" solution. >> I have heard/read that Mongrel (and older ruby) have had memory leaks, but >> not sure if thats still true today on current versions. >> -Chris >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Michael DeHaan <michael@reductivelabs.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Smain Kahlouch <smainklh@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > Hi everybody, >>> > >>> > I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and >>> > mongrel. >>> > I don''t understand what are the benefits of each solution. >>> > >>> > Do you have a part of the answer please? >>> >>> We seem to be directing folks to passenger if they are running a new >>> enough Puppet in the docs, yet this seems to conflict: >>> >>> http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/msg04745.html >>> (any updates on this?) >>> >>> I agree with the need to choose one performant "default suggestion" >>> and not leave someone with the task of evaluating/testing lots of >>> options. >>> >>> --Michael >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Puppet Users" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >>> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Puppet Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > > > > -- > Trevor Vaughan > Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc > (410) 541-6699 > tvaughan@onyxpoint.com > > -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >-- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
while i had monit babysitting mongrel, I''ve switched to passenger too. the 2-5% performance lost (according to my own benchmarks) is acceptable comparing the complexity of the setup. if anyone is looking for RPMS, I''ve created one for passenger (RHE5). my 2 cents, Ohad On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:38 PM, Nigel Kersten <nigelk@google.com> wrote:> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 6:34 AM, Trevor Vaughan <tvaughan@onyxpoint.com> > wrote: > > Passenger should be about 30% faster and has built-in memory > > management via mod-rack. > > > > This is a huge plus if you have a lot of nodes or limited memory. > > > > Also, you stop having problems with Apache getting out of sync with > > the puppetmaster if you restart the puppetmaster processes without > > also restarting Apache. > > ++ I found it incredibly difficult to write robust babysitter > processes for anything + multiple mongrels. > > It''s much simpler to manage apache with passenger. > > > > > > Trevor > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Christopher Johnston > > <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Mongrel was very easy to setup as the packages are all available in > Fedora. > >> I was able to fire up a puppetmaster on most of the cpu cores I have on > my > >> system to scale the load out a bit more. I have yet to try passenger. > But I > >> think more importantly what is the "fastest" and most "scalable" > solution. > >> I have heard/read that Mongrel (and older ruby) have had memory leaks, > but > >> not sure if thats still true today on current versions. > >> -Chris > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Michael DeHaan < > michael@reductivelabs.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Smain Kahlouch <smainklh@gmail.com> > >>> wrote: > >>> > Hi everybody, > >>> > > >>> > I just want to know what is the best web server between passenger and > >>> > mongrel. > >>> > I don''t understand what are the benefits of each solution. > >>> > > >>> > Do you have a part of the answer please? > >>> > >>> We seem to be directing folks to passenger if they are running a new > >>> enough Puppet in the docs, yet this seems to conflict: > >>> > >>> > http://www.mail-archive.com/puppet-users@googlegroups.com/msg04745.html > >>> (any updates on this?) > >>> > >>> I agree with the need to choose one performant "default suggestion" > >>> and not leave someone with the task of evaluating/testing lots of > >>> options. > >>> > >>> --Michael > >>> > >>> -- > >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >>> "Puppet Users" group. > >>> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >>> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > >>> For more options, visit this group at > >>> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups > >> "Puppet Users" group. > >> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > >> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > >> For more options, visit this group at > >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Trevor Vaughan > > Vice President, Onyx Point, Inc > > (410) 541-6699 > > tvaughan@onyxpoint.com > > > > -- This account not approved for unencrypted proprietary information -- > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > > > > > > > -- > nigel > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:14 AM, Christopher Johnston <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote:> Mongrel was very easy to setup as the packages are all available in Fedora.The solution here seems to help packaging for Fedora (and EPEL, if possible) along. Has anyone attempted packaging it previously? --Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
> if anyone is looking for RPMS, I''ve created one for passenger (RHE5). >Sorry, missed this earlier. Excellent. Can you give me the URL to the source RPM, specfile, and tarball? I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. Getting that approved should also help with CentOS Extras, I''d imagine. --Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Michael DeHaan wrote:> I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built > for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum.Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- like a year and a half. It''s held up due to bundled libraries (a similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it. -- Dick Cavett, in "Playboy", 1971
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> wrote:> Michael DeHaan wrote: >> I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built >> for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. > > Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- > like a year and a half. It''s held up due to bundled libraries (a > similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696I see they forked a C++ library. Yeah I agree with Toshio there, that''s dangerous. On a semi-related note, I know it''s new and so forth, but has anyone tried unicorn? http://github.com/blog/517-unicorn http://labs.revelationglobal.com/2009/10/06/mongrel_passenger_unicorn.html --Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn''t tested anything in or know who is maintaining it though. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> wrote:> Michael DeHaan wrote: > > I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built > > for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. > > Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- > like a year and a half. It''s held up due to bundled libraries (a > similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 > > -- > Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable > to dispense it. > -- Dick Cavett, in "Playboy", 1971 > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Having used Webrick, Mongrel+(pound/nginx/apache) and Passenger+Apache all in production on 100+ hosts, I definitely recommend passenger. It''s much easier to manage once it''s up and running. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Johnston <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote:> http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ > Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn''t tested anything in or > know who is maintaining it though. > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> Michael DeHaan wrote: >> > I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built >> > for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. >> >> Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- >> like a year and a half. It''s held up due to bundled libraries (a >> similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 >> >> -- >> Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable >> to dispense it. >> -- Dick Cavett, in "Playboy", 1971 >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Am I missing something with mongrel though? It seemed straighfwd to me just a custom httpd.conf you add the puppetmaster ports you want it to proxy too and make sure the puppetmasters have the ports. Or is it they passenger is more flexible? On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Jeff McCune <mccune.jeff@gmail.com> wrote:> Having used Webrick, Mongrel+(pound/nginx/apache) and Passenger+Apache > all in production on 100+ hosts, I definitely recommend passenger. > It''s much easier to manage once it''s up and running. > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Johnston > <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote: > > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ > > Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn''t tested anything in > or > > know who is maintaining it though. > > > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> wrote: > >> > >> Michael DeHaan wrote: > >> > I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built > >> > for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. > >> > >> Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- > >> like a year and a half. It''s held up due to bundled libraries (a > >> similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 > >> > >> -- > >> Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp > >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > >> As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable > >> to dispense it. > >> -- Dick Cavett, in "Playboy", 1971 > >> > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Puppet Users" group. > > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com<puppet-users%2Bunsubscribe@googlegroups.com> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 8:37 AM, Christopher Johnston <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote:> Am I missing something with mongrel though? It seemed straighfwd to me just > a custom httpd.conf you add the puppetmaster ports you want it to proxy too > and make sure the puppetmasters have the ports. > Or is it they passenger is more flexible?When you''re running with Passenger, to start/stop the service you''re simply stopping/starting Apache. When you have multiple mongrel backends with pound/nginx/apache in front of them, you''re managing multiple processes and services, which I find annoying.> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:34 AM, Jeff McCune <mccune.jeff@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Having used Webrick, Mongrel+(pound/nginx/apache) and Passenger+Apache >> all in production on 100+ hosts, I definitely recommend passenger. >> It''s much easier to manage once it''s up and running. >> >> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Christopher Johnston >> <chjohnst@gmail.com> wrote: >> > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ >> > Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn''t tested anything in >> > or >> > know who is maintaining it though. >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:03 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> Michael DeHaan wrote: >> >> > I''d like to push this through to Fedora review so we can get it built >> >> > for EPEL (at least RHEL 5) and be available via yum. >> >> >> >> Passenger has been in the Fedora/EPEL review queue for a long time -- >> >> like a year and a half. It''s held up due to bundled libraries (a >> >> similar theme among Rails folks, unfortunately). >> >> >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470696 >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp >> >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> >> As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable >> >> to dispense it. >> >> -- Dick Cavett, in "Playboy", 1971 >> >> >> > >> > -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "Puppet Users" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> > For more options, visit this group at >> > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Puppet Users" group. >> To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >> > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Puppet Users" group. > To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en. >-- nigel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
Christopher Johnston wrote:> http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ > > Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn''t tested > anything in or know who is maintaining it though.Those packages are done by Jeroen van Meeuwen, the same fellow who''s trying to get passenger into Fedora and EPEL. Some might recognize the name from checking the Fedora/EPEL puppet package changelog too. He''s the current maintainer for the puppet packages (which I help co-maintain). :) -- Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Even if you''re on the right track, you''ll get run over if you just sit there. -- Will Rogers
I just installed passenger from his repo, clean install thus far. On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Todd Zullinger <tmz@pobox.com> wrote:> Christopher Johnston wrote: > > http://www.kanarip.com/custom/ > > > > Someone pointed me to this repo the other day, havn''t tested > > anything in or know who is maintaining it though. > > Those packages are done by Jeroen van Meeuwen, the same fellow who''s > trying to get passenger into Fedora and EPEL. Some might recognize > the name from checking the Fedora/EPEL puppet package changelog too. > He''s the current maintainer for the puppet packages (which I help > co-maintain). :) > > -- > Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Even if you''re on the right track, you''ll get run over if you just sit > there. > -- Will Rogers > >-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Nigel Kersten <nigelk@google.com> wrote:> When you have multiple mongrel backends with pound/nginx/apache in > front of them, you''re managing multiple processes and services, which > I find annoying.Exactly this reason for me too. In addition, I really like the simplicity of setting PassengerMaxRequests to something reasonable which restarts the puppetmaster process for me on a periodic basis. -Jeff -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.