Michal Soltys
2013-Apr-15 11:22 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] RFC about adding new variable (ups.runtime)
Namely something like: ups.runtime - amount of seconds since powering up The reason is essentially "side effect" of this bug report: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.monitoring.nut.user/7705 Where T denotes total time since ups' power up. On upses with AP9612TH it's used for dual temperature sensors (which top of apcsmart branch should gracefully support). Either way, would be nice to handle that already and provide one or the other depending on detected format.
Charles Lepple
2013-Apr-15 11:31 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] RFC about adding new variable (ups.runtime)
On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Michal Soltys wrote:> Namely something like: > > ups.runtime - amount of seconds since powering upI like the idea. Many UPS manufacturers specify the amount of time on battery for a given load as "runtime", though, so maybe "ups.uptime" (similar to the Unix uptime command)? -- Charles Lepple clepple at gmail
Michal Soltys
2013-Apr-15 11:46 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] RFC about adding new variable (ups.runtime)
W dniu 15.04.2013 13:31, Charles Lepple pisze:> On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Michal Soltys wrote: > >> Namely something like: >> >> ups.runtime - amount of seconds since powering up > > > I like the idea. Many UPS manufacturers specify the amount of time on battery for a given load as "runtime", though, so maybe "ups.uptime" (similar to the Unix uptime command)? >Agree, sounds better.
Arnaud Quette
2013-Apr-17 18:29 UTC
[Nut-upsdev] RFC about adding new variable (ups.runtime)
You may even go more generic with device.uptime Arno (sent from my S3... please excuse my brevity) Le 15 avr. 2013 13:46, "Michal Soltys" <soltys at ziu.info> a ?crit :> W dniu 15.04.2013 13:31, Charles Lepple pisze: > >> On Apr 15, 2013, at 7:22 AM, Michal Soltys wrote: >> >> Namely something like: >>> >>> ups.runtime - amount of seconds since powering up >>> >> >> >> I like the idea. Many UPS manufacturers specify the amount of time on >> battery for a given load as "runtime", though, so maybe "ups.uptime" >> (similar to the Unix uptime command)? >> >> > Agree, sounds better. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > Nut-upsdev mailing list > Nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.**debian.org <Nut-upsdev at lists.alioth.debian.org> > http://lists.alioth.debian.**org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/**nut-upsdev<http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nut-upsdev> >-------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/attachments/20130417/ede73589/attachment.html>