Greetings, I recently made a <failed> attempt to move from RELENG_8 to RELENG_9. I've been on BSD since the early 80's, and with the exception of a couple of failed kernels (my fault), I've never had one failure with the build(world|kernel) || install(world|kernel). The only notable difference I noticed, was the addition of clang. While I can't (yet) conclusively blame it on clang. I _can_ say, that the whole process took _3_ times longer, than without. So my question is; is it possible to build(world|kernel) && install(world|kernel) without the clang toolchain? If for no other reason but to discover whether clang was responsible for the failure, and whether building w/o clang is any faster. Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris
As I understand it, gcc is still the default on 9 ----- Tim Daneliuk Chris H <chris#@1command.com> wrote:>Greetings, > I recently made a <failed> attempt to move from RELENG_8 >to RELENG_9. I've been on BSD since the early 80's, and with >the exception of a couple of failed kernels (my fault), I've >never had one failure with the build(world|kernel) || >install(world|kernel). The only notable difference I noticed, >was the addition of clang. While I can't (yet) conclusively >blame it on clang. I _can_ say, that the whole process took _3_ >times longer, than without. So my question is; is it possible >to build(world|kernel) && install(world|kernel) without the >clang toolchain? If for no other reason but to discover whether >clang was responsible for the failure, and whether building w/o >clang is any faster. > >Thank you for all your time, and consideration. > >--Chris > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
On 16 December 2012 21:17, Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com> wrote:> As I understand it, gcc is still the default on 9For the build, but clang is still built.> is it possible >>to build(world|kernel) && install(world|kernel) without the >>clang toolchain?make -DWITHOUT_CLANG -- Eitan Adler
Greetings, and thank you for the response.> On 16 December 2012 21:17, Tim Daneliuk <tundra at tundraware.com> wrote: >> As I understand it, gcc is still the default on 9 > > For the build, but clang is still built. > >> is it possible >>>to build(world|kernel) && install(world|kernel) without the >>>clang toolchain? > > make -DWITHOUT_CLANGGood news! Thanks for taking the time to respond Eitan. --Chris> > > -- > Eitan Adler >
have a look at /etc/src.conf and $ man src.cof you can set many buildworld options there. -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-do-I-circumvent-the-use-of-clang-during-build-tp5769907p5770203.html Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Greetings Beeblebrox, and thank you for your reply.> have a look at /etc/src.conf and > $ man src.cof > you can set many buildworld options there.Good advise! Thanks. --Chris> > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/How-do-I-circumvent-the-use-of-clang-during-build-tp5769907p5770203.html > Sent from the freebsd-stable mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable at freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe at freebsd.org" >--